Primates

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 265–279 | Cite as

The function of peaceful post-conflict contacts among primates

  • Joan B. Silk
Symposium
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Reconciliation has been the subject of considerable research in the last decade, and researchers have demonstrated that in many species of Old World monkeys and apes former opponents are more likely to engage in friendly interactions in the minutes that follow conflicts than they are at other times.de Waal has suggested that the function of these interactions is to mend relationships that have been damaged by conflict. Although peaceful post-conflict interactions are thought to have long-term effects upon the nature of social relationships, behavioral evidence presently indicates that the effects of these interactions may be limited to the post-conflict period. Theoretical considerations also raise some doubts about whether the relationship-repair hypothesis is cogent. Data that demonstrate that peaceful post-conflict interactions facilitate peaceful interactions and relieve victim's uncertainty and anxiety about whether conflict will be continued suggest that peaceful post-conflict interactions may be a means to reestablish contact with former opponents. Thus, they appear to function as predictive signals that the actor is going to stop fighting and behave peacefully. Such signals may be important in a broad range of social contexts.

Key Words

Reconciliation Predictive signals Aggression Conflict resolution Communication 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aureli, F. 1992. Post-conflict behaviour among wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 31: 329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aureli, F.;van Schaik, C. P. 1991. Post-conflict behaviour in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis): I. The social events.Ethology, 89: 89–100.Google Scholar
  3. Aureli, F.;van Schaik, C. P.;van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. 1989. Functional aspects of reconciliation among captive long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Amer. J. Primatol., 19: 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aureli, F.;Veenema, H. C.;van Panthaleon van Eck, C. J.;van Hooff, J.A.R.A.M. 1993. Reconciliation, consolation, and redirection in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).Behaviour, 124: 1–21.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, K. C.;Smuts, B. B. 1994. Social relationships of female chimpanzees: diversity between captive social groups. In:Chimpanzee Cultures,Wrangham,R. W.;McGrew,W. C.;de Waal,F. B. M.;Heltne,P. G. (eds.), Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 227–242.Google Scholar
  6. Bauers, K. A. 1993. A functional analysis of staccato grunt vocalizations in the stumptailed macaque (Macaca arctoides).Ethology, 94(2): 147–161.Google Scholar
  7. Blount, B. 1985. “Girney” vocalizations among Japanese macaque females: context and function.Primates, 26: 424–435.Google Scholar
  8. Call, J.;Judge, P. G.;de Waal, F. B. M. 1996. Influence of kinship and spatial density on reconciliation and grooming in rhesus monkeys.Amer. J. Primatol., 39: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castles, D.;Whiten, A. 1996. Baboon relationships: scratching and feelings. Paper presented at the XVIth Congress of the International Primatological Society and the XIXth Conference of the American Society of Primatologists, August 11–16, 1996. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  10. Cheney, D. L.; Sayfarth, R. W. in press. Reconciliatory grunts by dominant female baboons influence victims' behaviour.Anim. Behaviour.Google Scholar
  11. Cheney, D. L.;Seyfarth, R. M.;Silk, J. B. 1995. The role of grunts in reconciling opponents and facilitating interactions among adult female baboons.Anim. Behav., 50: 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock, T. H.;Albon, S. D. 1979. The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement.Behaviour, 69: 145–170.Google Scholar
  13. Cords, M. 1988. Resolution of aggressive conflicts by immature long-tailed macaquesMacaca fascicularis.Anim. Behav., 36: 1124–1135.Google Scholar
  14. Cords, M. 1992. Post-conflict reunions and reconciliation in long-tailed macaques.Anim. Behav., 44: 57–61.Google Scholar
  15. Cords, M. 1993. On operationally defining reconciliation.Amer. J. Primatol., 29: 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cords, M.;Aureli, F. 1993. Patterns of reconciliation among juvenile long-tailed macaques. In:Juvenile Primates: Life History, Development, and Behavior,Pereira,M. E.;Fairbanks,L. A. (eds.), Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 271–285.Google Scholar
  17. Cords, M.;Thurnheer, S. 1993. Reconciliation with valuable partners by long-tailed macaques.Ethology, 93: 315–325.Google Scholar
  18. de Waal, F. B. M. 1993. Reconciliation among primates: a review of empirical evidence and unresolved issues. In:Primate Social Conflict,Mason,W. A.;Mendoza,S. P. (eds.), SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 111–144.Google Scholar
  19. de Waal, F. B. M.;Johanowicz, D. L. 1993. Modification of reconciliation behavior through social experience: an experiment with two macaque species.Child. Develop., 64: 897–908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. de Waal, F. B. M.;Luttrell, L. 1989. Toward a comparative socioecology of the genusMacaca: different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptailed macaques.Amer. J. Primatol., 19: 83–109.Google Scholar
  21. de Waal, F. B. M.;Ren, R. 1988. Comparison of the reconciliation behavior of stumptailed and rhesus macaques.Ethology, 78: 129–142.Google Scholar
  22. de Waal, F. B. M.;van Roosmalen, A. 1979. Reconciliation and consolation among chimpanzees.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 5: 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Waal, F. B. M.;Yoshihara, D. 1983. Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys.Behaviour, 85: 224–241.Google Scholar
  24. Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps.J. Theor. Biol., 144: 517–546.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gust, D.;Gordon, T. P. 1993. Conflict resolution in sooty mangabeys.Anim. Behav., 46: 685–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harper, D. G. C. 1991. Communication. In:Behavioural Ecology,Krebs,J. R.;Davies,N. B. (eds.), Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford, pp. 374–397.Google Scholar
  27. Hinde, R. A. 1983. A conceptual approach. In:Primate Social Relationships,Hinde,R. A. (ed.), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  28. Johnstone, R. A.;Grafen, A. 1992. The continuous Philip Sidney game: a simple model of biological signalling.J. Theor. Biol., 156: 215–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Judge, P. G. 1991. Dyadic and triadic reconciliation in pigtail macaques (Macaca nemestrina).Amer. J. Primatol., 23: 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaldor, E. 1996. The meaning and social function of grunt and girney vocalizations inMacaca mulatta. M. A. thesis, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  31. Kappeler, P. 1993. Reconciliation and post-conflict behaviour in ringtailed lemurs,Lemur catta, and redfronted lemurs,Eulemur fulvus fulvus.Anim. Behav., 45: 901–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kappeler, P.;van Schaik, C. P. 1992. Methodological and evolutionary aspects of reconciliation among primates.Ethology, 92: 51–69.Google Scholar
  33. Maynard Smith, J. 1994. Must reliable signals always be costly?Anim. Behav., 47: 1115–1120.Google Scholar
  34. Ren, R.;Yan, K.;Su, Y.;Qi, H.;Liang, B.;Bao, W.;de Waal, F. B. M. 1991. The reconciliation behavior of golden monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellanae roxellanae) in small breeding groups.Primates, 32: 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silk, J. B. 1996. Why do primates reconcile?Evol. Anthropol., 5: 39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Silk, J. B.;Cheney, D. L.;Seyfarth, R. M. 1996. The form and function of post-conflict interactions between female baboons.Anim. Behav., 52: 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smucny, D. 1996. Heart rate correlates of reconciliation in captive adult female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Paper presented at the XVIth Congress of the International Primatological Society and the XIXth Conference of the American Society of Primatologists, August 11–16, 1996. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  38. Thierry, B. 1986. A comparative study of aggression and response to aggression in three species of macaque. In:Primate Ontogeny, Cognition, and Social Behavior,Else,J. B.;Lee,P. C. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 307–313.Google Scholar
  39. Thierry, B. 1990. The state of equilibrium, among agonistic behavior patterns in a group of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata).C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 310: 35–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Thierry, B.;Anderson, J. R.;Demaria, C.;Desportes, C.;Pettit, O. 1996. Tonkean macaque behaviour from the perspective of the evolution of Sulawesi macaques. In:Current Primatology, Vol. 2,Roeder,J. J.;Thierry,B.;Anderson,J. R.;Herrenschmidt,N. (eds.), Univ. Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, pp. 103–117.Google Scholar
  41. Veenema, H. C.;Das, M.;Aureli, F. 1994. Methodological improvements for the study of reconciliation.Behav, Proc., 31: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watts, D. P. 1995. Post-conflict social events in wild mountain gorillas (Mammalia, Hominoidea): I. Social interactions between opponents.Ethology, 100: 139–157.Google Scholar
  43. York, A. D.;Rowell, T. E. 1988. Reconciliation following aggression in patas monkeys,Erythrocebus patas.Anim Behav., 36: 502–509.Google Scholar
  44. Zahavi, A. 1977. Reliability in communication systems and the evolution of altruism. In:Evolutionary Ecology,Stonehouse,B.;Perrins,C. M. (eds.), MacMillan, London, pp. 254–259.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Center 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan B. Silk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesU. S. A.

Personalised recommendations