, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 63–80

Resource availability and population density in primates: A socio-bioenergetic analysis of the energy budgets of Guatemalan howler and spider monkeys

  • Anthony M. CoelhoJr.
  • Claud A. Bramblett
  • Larry B. Quick
  • Sharon S. Bramblett


This paper presents data on the food and energy utilization budgets of two sympatric species of nonhuman primates living in the quasi-rain forest of Tikal, Guatemala. Seven researchers working in teams obtained approximately 1200 hours of animal-observer contact time, representing approximately 2400 hours in the field. The following information is herein presented: (1) data on the estimated energy expenditure of the cebidae population living in the study site; (2) the nutritional composition of some foods eaten by Tikal's howler and spider population; (3) an estimate of the nutritional intake of howlers and spiders; and (4) an estimate of the carrying capacity of the habitat. The above types of data were combined in an attempt to answer the following question: To what extent are population density and size an indication of the carrying capacity of the habitat either in terms of food availability or quality? Data presented in this paper suggest that low population density and small group size are not necessarily the result of a nutritionally poor environment. The Tikal study site is capable of supporting 8,500 animal/km2. In the absence of other comparable quantitative socio-bioenergetic surveys it is herein suggested that the concept of food resource limitation is largely a myth among primatologists.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altmann, S. &J. Altmann, 1971.Baboon Ecology: African Field Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. ————, 1974. Baboons space, time, and energy.Amer. Zool., 14: 221–248.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, H., 1945. Body weight: howler, spider and capucian. In:Growth,P. Altman &P. Dittmer (eds.), Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Washington D. C., p. 350.Google Scholar
  4. Coelho, A., 1973. Socio-bioenergetics and sexual dimorphism in sykes monkeys.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  5. ————, 1974a. Activity differentials in a captive group of Sykes monkeys (Cercopithecus albogularis kolbi): A socio-bioenergetic analysis.Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 40: 133.Google Scholar
  6. ————, 1974b. Socio-bioenergetics and sexual dimorphism in primates.Primates, 15: 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ————, 1974c. Energy budgets of Guatemalan howler and spider monkeys: A sociobioenergetic analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, The University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  8. ————,C. Bramblett, &L. Quick, 1974a.Alouatta villosa in Guatemala: A preliminary report of the socio-bioenergetics of howler monkeys.Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 41(3): 472–473.Google Scholar
  9. ----, ----, & ----, 1974b. A comparison of socio-bioenergetics in Guatemalan howler and spider monkeys.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Mexico.Google Scholar
  10. Denham, W., 1971. Energy relations and some basic properties of primate social organization.Amer. Anthrop., 73: 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iwamoto, T., 1974. A bioeconomic study on a provisioned troop of Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata fuscata) at Koshima Islet, Miyazaki.Primates, 15: 241–262.Google Scholar
  12. Kleiber, M., 1961.The Fire of Life. Wiley Pub., New York.Google Scholar
  13. Lundell, C., 1934. Preliminary sketch of the photogeography of the Yucatan Peninsula. Carneigie Instit., Washington, 436: 257–321.Google Scholar
  14. ————, 1937. The vegetation of Peten. Carneigie Inst., Washington, No. 478.Google Scholar
  15. ————, 1938. Plants probably utilized by old Empire Maya of Peten and adjacent lowlands.Papers of the Michigan Academy Science Arts and Letters. Vol. XXIV, part 1: 37–56.Google Scholar
  16. Glander, K., 1973 Resource utilization: A ecological view of primate social structure.Paper delivered at the IX International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. ————, 1974a. Baby-sitting, infant sharing, and adoptive behavior in mantled howling monkeys.Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., 41(3): 482.Google Scholar
  18. ----, 1974b. Habitat definition: An ecological view of social organization.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Mexico.Google Scholar
  19. Gonzalez, P., 1939. El ramon o capomo.Boletin Plantero y Agricola, 2: 221–222.Google Scholar
  20. Guyton, A., 1971.Textbook of Medical Physiology. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  21. Incap-Icnnd, 1961. Composition de alimentos commumente Usados en America Latina.Publicaciones Cientificas del Instituto de Nutricion de Centro American y Panama.Google Scholar
  22. Kerr, G., 1972. Nutritional requirements of subhuman primates.Physiol. Rev., 52: 415–467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. National Academy of Sciences, 1968.Recommended Dietary Allowances. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, No.Google Scholar
  24. Malinow, M. &C. Maruffo, 1965. Aortic atherosclerosis in free-ranging howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya).Nature, 206: 948–949.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nie, N., D. Bent, &C. Hull, 1970. SPSS:Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Portman, O., 1970. Nutritional requirements of nonhuman primates. In:Feeding and Nutrition of Nonhuman Primates,R. Harris (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 87–116.Google Scholar
  27. Puleston, D., 1968.Brosimum alicastrum as a subsistence alternative for the classic Maya of the central southern lowlands. Masters Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  28. Tucker, V., 1970. Energetic cost of locomotion in animals.Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 34: 841–846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wagner, P., 1964. Natural vegetation of middle America. In:The Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 1,R. Wauchope (ed.), Univ. of Texas Press, Austin, pp. 216–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony M. CoelhoJr.
    • 1
  • Claud A. Bramblett
    • 2
  • Larry B. Quick
    • 2
  • Sharon S. Bramblett
    • 2
  1. 1.Primate Ethology Laboratory, Southwest Foundation for Research and EducationU. S. A.
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Texas, AustinAustinU. S. A.

Personalised recommendations