, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 133–140 | Cite as

Role of some physical characteristics in species recognition by pigtail monkeys

  • Kazuo Fujita


Three adult pigtail monkeys pressed a lever to see pictures of pigtail and Japanese monkeys with a variety of physical features being removed. The features included head, tail, body, background, and color. The duration and the interval of exposure of these visual stimuli were dependent upon subjects' responding. Preferences for those pictures were evaluated by the ratio of lever-pressing duration to interval of lever-pressing. Two of the subjects showed a consistent preference to see pictures of pigtail monkeys over those of Japanese monkeys. Though this preference tended to maintain when these physical features were removed, it became relatively weak when head and head + tail were removed. These results suggest that pigtail macaques may discriminate species based not on a single characteristics but on some combination of features, and that head may be relatively important than the other features.

Key Words

Species recognition Social perception Social preference Visual preference Releaser Sensory reinforcement Pigtail monkeys 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernstein, I. S. &T. P. Gordon, 1980. Mixed taxa introductions, hybrids and macaque systematics. In:The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution,D. G. Lindburg (ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 125–147.Google Scholar
  2. Chiarelli, B., 1973. Check-list of Catarrhina primate hybrids.J. Human Genet., 2: 301–305.Google Scholar
  3. DeMaria, C. &B. Thierry, 1988. Responses to animal stimulus photographs in stumptailed macaques (Macaca arctoides).Primates, 29: 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fooden, J., 1980. Classification and distribution of living macaques (Macaca lacépède, 1799). In:The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior and Evolution,D. G. Lindburg (ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. Fowler, H., 1971. Implications of sensory reinforcement. In:The Nature of Reinforcement,R. Glazer (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 151–195.Google Scholar
  6. Fujita, K., 1987. Species recognition by five macaque monkeys.Primates, 28: 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ————, 1989a. Species recognition by macaques.Biol. Sci., 41: 1–12. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. ————, 1989b. Species recognition in nonhuman primates.Jap. Psychol. Rev., 32: 66–89. (in Japanese with English Summary)Google Scholar
  9. ————, 1990. Species preference by infant macaques with controlled social experience.Int. J. Primatol., 11: 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ————, 1993. Development of visual preference for closely related species by infant and juvenile macaques with restricted social experience.Primates, 34: 141–150.Google Scholar
  11. ———— &T. Matsuzawa, 1986. A new procedure to study the perceptual world of animals with sensory reinforcement: recognition of humans by a chimpanzee.Primates, 27: 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Higley, J. D., W. D. Hopkins, R. M. Hirsh, L. M. Marra, &S. J. Suomi, 1987. Preferences of female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) for infantile coloration.Develop. Psychobiol., 20: 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kish, G. B., 1966. Studies of sensory reinforcement. In:Operat Behavior,W. K. Honig (ed.), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 109–159.Google Scholar
  14. Kyes, R. C. &D. K. Candland, 1987. Baboon (Papio hamadryas) visual preferences for regions of the face.J. Comp. Psychol., 101: 345–348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsuzawa, T., 1981. Sensory reinforcement: a variety of reinforcers.Jap. Psychol. Rev., 24: 220–251. (in Japanese with English Summary)Google Scholar
  16. ———— &K. Fujita, 1981. Behavioral analysis of sensory reinforcement in infant Japanese monkeys in terms of time allocation.Jap. J. Psychol., 51: 351–355. (in Japanese with English Summary)Google Scholar
  17. Rovee-Collier, C. K. &M. J. Gekoski, 1979. The economics of infancy: a review of conjugate reinforcement. In:Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 13,H. W. Reese &L. P. Lipsitt (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 195–255.Google Scholar
  18. Sackett, G. P., 1970. Unlearned responses, differential rearing experiences, and the development of social attachments by rhesus monkeys. In:Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Vol. 1,L. A. Rosenblum (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 111–140.Google Scholar
  19. Swartz, K. B., 1983. Species discrimination in infant pigtail macaques with pictorial stimuli.Develop. Psychobiol., 16: 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———— &L. A. Rosenblum, 1980. Operant responding by bonnet macaques for color videotaped recordings of social stimuli.Anim. Learning Behav., 8: 311–321.Google Scholar
  21. Tinbergen, N., 1951.The Study of Instinct. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Yoshikubo, S., 1985. Species discrimination and concept formation by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Primates, 26: 285–299.Google Scholar
  23. ————, 1987. A possible reproductive isolation through a species discrimination learning in genusMacaca.Primate Res., 3: 43–47. (in Japanese with English Summary)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuo Fujita
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Primate Research InstituteKyoto UniversityAichiJapan

Personalised recommendations