Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 289–308 | Cite as

The study of vocal communication of wild mandrills in Cameroon in relation to their social structure

  • Hiroko Kudo
Article

Abstract

The vocal repertoire of the mandrill (Mandrillus sphinx), a forest living baboon, is described, and their vocal communication analyzed quantitatively. Although the vocal repertoire of mandrills corresponds well to that of savanna living baboons,Papio, some characteristics differed, such as the development of long-distance calls and differentiation of vocalizations between age-sex classes. Vocal communication within a group was closely related to changes in the spatial distribution of group members, and the two most common vocalizations, crowing and 2PG, appear to function as contact calls. Based on the wide dispersion of food trees, a group of mandrills divided into several feeding groups (subgroups). The two types of contact call were given in different and in some senses complementary contexts, and helped to facilitate and maintain group integration. According to their acoustic structure, these calls are long distance calls. Influenced by the high-level of attenuation of vocalization on the forest floor, the mandrill has developed them as contact calls, instead of using the contact “grunt,” which is common to the savanna living baboons. Comparing the patterns of vocal exchanges of mandrills with those of gelada and hamadryas baboons which have a multi-levelled society, the social structure of the mandrill is discussed. From the analysis of the spatial distribution of vocal emission, a number of clusters of vocalizations were obtained. These clusters correspond to subgroups. The frequent female-female and female-male vocal exchange between subgroups of mandrills suggest that the relationships between subgroups are less closed than between the one-male units of gelada and hamadryas baboons. Furthermore some of these clusters include more than two vocalizing adult males, while in other clusters there are no vocalizing adult males. Thus, the social structure of mandrills is suggested to be multi-male rather than a multilevelled type. The absence of contact calls specific for short distance and the functional replacement of the grunting of all group members by persistent emission of a loud call (2PG) by usually just one adult male suggests that the social structure of mandrills is not exactly equivalent to that of the multimale troop of savanna living baboons. Usually the use of 2PG is monopolized by one adult male travelling in the rear part of the group. Such monopolization of 2PG emission and the pattern of 2PG-2PG or 2PG-roar exchanges by adult males in some cases indicate the existence of strong dominance relationships among adult males, and especially the existence of a leader male within a multi-male group of mandrills.

Key Words

Mandrillus sphinx Vocal communication Social structure Multi-male troop Leader male 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich-Blake, F. P. G., T. K. Bunn, R. I. M. Dunbar, &P. M. Headley, 1971. Observations on baboons,Papio anubis, in an arid region in Ethiopia.Folia Primatol., 15: 1–35.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, J., 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling method.Behaviour, 49: 227–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, C. M., 1981. Subtrooping in a chacma baboon (Papio ursinus) population.Primates, 22: 445–458.Google Scholar
  4. Byrne, R. W., 1981. Distance vocal communications of Guinea baboons (Papio papio) in Senegal: an analysis of function.Behaviour, 78: 283–312.Google Scholar
  5. Chalmers, N. R., 1968. The visual and vocal communication of free living mangabeys in Uganda.Folia Primatol., 9: 258–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clutton-Brock, T. H. &P. H. Harvey, 1976. Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In:Growing Points in Ethology,P. P. G. Bateson &R. A. Hinde (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 195–237.Google Scholar
  7. Crook, J. H., 1972. Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organization in the primates. In:Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man,B. Campbell (ed.), Aldine Pub. Co., Chicago, pp. 231–281.Google Scholar
  8. Dunbar, R. I. M. &M. F. Nathan, 1972. Social organization of the Guinea baboon,Papio papio.Folia Primatol., 17: 321–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. &E. P. Dunbar, 1975.Social Dynamics of Gelada Baboons. S. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  10. Emory, G. R., 1975. Comparison of spatial and orientational relationships as manifestations of divergent models of social organization in captive groups ofMandrillus sphinx andTheropithecus gelada.Folia Primatol., 24: 293–314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gartlan, J. S., 1970. Preliminary notes on the ecology and behavior of drillMandrillus leucophaeus Ritgen, 1824. In:Old World Monkeys,J. Napier &P. H. Napier (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 445–480.Google Scholar
  12. Gautier, J. P., 1978. Repertoire sonére deCercopithecus cephus.Z. Tierpsychol., 46: 113–169.Google Scholar
  13. Green, S., 1975. Variation of vocal pattern with social situation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata): a field study. In:Primate Behavior; Vol. 4, Development in Field and Laboratory Research,L. A. Rosenblum (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–102.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, K. R. L. &I. DeVore, 1965. Baboon social behavior. In:Primate Social Behavior,I. DeVore &K. R. L. Hall (eds.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 53–110.Google Scholar
  15. Hill, O. W. C., 1970.Primates Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy. VIII. Chinopithecinae.Papio, Mandrillus, Theropithecus. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  16. Hoshino, J., 1985. Feeding ecology of mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) in Campo Animal Reserve, Cameroon.Primates, 26: 248–273.Google Scholar
  17. ,A. Mori, H. Kudo, &M. Kawai, 1984. Preliminary report on the grouping of mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) in Cameroon.Primates, 25: 295–307.Google Scholar
  18. Itani, J., 1963. Vocal communication of the wild Japanese monkey.Primates, 4: 11–66.Google Scholar
  19. Jolly, C. N., 1970. The large african monkeys as an adaptation array. In:Old World Monkeys,J. R. Napier &P. H. Napier (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 139–174.Google Scholar
  20. Jouventin, P., 1975. Observations sur la socio-écologie du mandrills.La Térre et la Vie, 29: 493–532.Google Scholar
  21. Kawai, M. (ed) 1979a.Ecological and Sociological Studies of Gelada Baboons Kodansha, Tokyo & S. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  22. , 1979b. Auditory communication and social relations. In:Ecological and Sociological Studies of Gelada Baboons,M. Kawai (ed.), Kodansha, Tokyo & S. Karger, Basel, pp. 219–241.Google Scholar
  23. &U. Mori, 1979. Spacing within units and unit integrity. In:Ecological and Sociological Studies of Gelada Baboons,M. Kawai (ed.), Kodansha, Tokyo & S. Karger, Basel, pp. 200–218.Google Scholar
  24. Kudo, H. &M. Mitani, 1985. New record of predatory behavior by mandrill in Cameroon.Primates, 26: 161–167.Google Scholar
  25. Kummer, H., 1968.The Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Marler, P., 1963. Aggregation and dispersal: Two functions in primate communication. In:Primates, Studies in Adaptation and Variability,P. C. Jay (ed.), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 420–438.Google Scholar
  27. Mellen, J. D., A. P. Littlewood, B. C. Barrow, &V. J. Stevens, 1981. Individual and social behavior in a captive troop of mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx).Primates, 22: 206–220.Google Scholar
  28. Mitani, M. 1986. Voiceprint identification and its application to sociological study of wild Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata yakui).Primates, 27: 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mori, A., in prep. Analysis of tree patchiness and seed dispersion in the tropical rain forest of West Africa.Google Scholar
  30. Mori, U., 1979. Inter-unit relationships. In:Ecological and Sociological Studies of Gelada Baboons,M. Kawai (ed.), Kodansha, Tokyo & S. Karger, Basel, pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
  31. Ransom, T. W., 1980.Beach Troop of the Gombe. Lewisburg Bucknell Univ. Press, London.Google Scholar
  32. Rhine, J. R., 1975. The order of movement of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus).Folia Primatol., 23: 72–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Richards, D. G. &R. H. Wiley, 1980. Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication.Amer. Naturalist, 115: 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rowell, T. E., 1966. Forest living baboons in Uganda.J. Zool., London, 149: 344–364.Google Scholar
  35. &R. A. Hinde, 1962. Vocal communication by the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 138: 279–294.Google Scholar
  36. Sabater Pí, J., 1972. Contribution to the ecology ofMandrillus sphinx of Rio Muni (Republic of Equatorial Guinea).Folia Primatol., 17: 304–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Snowdon, C. T. &Y. V. Pola, 1978. Interspecific and intraspecific responses to synthesized pygmy marmoset vocalizations.Anim. Behav., 26: 192–206.Google Scholar
  38. Struhsaker, T. T., 1969. Correlates of ecology and social organization among African Cercopithecines.Folia Primatol., 11: 80–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. , 1970. Phylogenetic implications of some vocalizations of Cercopithecus monkeys. In:Old World Monkeys,J. R. Napier &P. H. Napier (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 367–444.Google Scholar
  40. Sugawara, K., in prep. An ethological analysis of social behavior in free-ranging groups of anubishamadryas hybrid baboons.Google Scholar
  41. Waser, P. &M. Waser, 1977. Experimental studies of primates vocalization: specializations for long-distance propagation.Z. Tierpsychol., 43: 239–263.Google Scholar
  42. Zimmermann, E., 1985. The vocal repertoire of the adult senegal bushbaby (Galago senegarensis senegarensis).Behaviour, 94: 212–233.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroko Kudo
    • 1
  1. 1.Primate Research InstituteKyoto UniversityInuyama, AichiJapan

Personalised recommendations