, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 543–560

Interspecific allometry of the mandible, dental arch, and molar area in anthropoid primates: Functional morphology of masticatory components

  • Eisaku Kanazawa
  • A. L. Rosenberger


Allometric equations relating the lengths and widths of the mandible and dental arch, and of molar area, were obtained in a wide range of anthropoid primates grouped into four subsets, pongids, cercopithecids, nonmarmoset platyrrhines, and marmosets. Mandibular width is negatively allometric against length across anthropoids but cercopithecids had relatively wider mandibles than nonmarmosets of the same size class. Mandibular length relative to dental arch length was isometric within and between the four groups but dental arch width scaled negatively against all the other dimensions examined in this study, indicating a functional dissociation between the dental arcade and the bony mandible. Molar area showed various scaling patterns relative to mandibular length (isometry) and width (positive). There were no parameters that scaled positively against body weight across groups, except for molar area in cercopithecids (strongly) and nonmarmoset (moderately). Notable functional specializations include relatively long dental arches in cercopithecoids, related to large, elongate bilophodont molars, and the tendency to increase relative jaw length across the range of anthropoid sizes, reflecting negative allometry of the brain (cranial bicondylar width). We caution that various allometry and functional patterns may be masked by generalizing from broad taxonomic comparison involving a large sweep of adaptative patterns.

Key Words

Masticatory apparatus Primate dentition Mandible Allometry Regression Anthropoids 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bouvier, M., 1986. Biomechanical scaling of mandibular dimensions in New World monkeys.Int. J. Primatol., 7: 551–567.Google Scholar
  2. Bronson, R. T., 1981. Brain weight-body weight relationships in 12 species of nonhuman primates.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 56: 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, P. M., 1941. A comparison of the skulls and the teeth of the two species ofHemicentetes.J. Mammal., 22: 65–81.Google Scholar
  4. Cachel, S., 1984. Growth and allometry in primate masticatory muscles.Arch. Oral Biol., 29: 287–293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Conroy, G. C., 1987. Problems of body-weight estimation in fossil primates.Int. J. Primatol., 8: 115–137.Google Scholar
  6. Eaglen, R. H., 1986. Morphometrics of the anterior dentition in strepsirhine primates.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 71: 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Filipsson, R. &L. Goldson, 1963. Correlation between tooth width, width of the head, length of the head and stature.Acta Odontol. Scand., 21: 359–365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleagle, J. G. &R. A. Mittermeier, 1980. Locomotor behavior, body size, and comparative ecology of seven Surinam monkeys.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 52: 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fooden, J., 1982.Taxonomy and Evolution of the Sinica Group of Macaques. 3. Species and Subspecies Accounts of Macaca assamensis. Fieldiana, Zoology (New Series), Vol. 10. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Freedman, L., 1962. Growth of muzzle length relative to calvaria length inPapio.Growth, 26: 117–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Garn, S. M., A. B. Lewis, &R. S. Kerewsky, 1968. The magnitude and implications of the relationship between tooth size and body size.Arch. Oral Biol., 13: 129–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gingerich, P. D., B. H. Smith, &K. Rosenberger, 1982. Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and prediction of body weight from tooth size in fossils.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 58: 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein, S., D. Post, &D. Melnick, 1978. An analysis of cercopithecoid odontometrics. I. The scaling of the maxillary dentition.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 49: 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grand, T. I., 1977. Body weight: Its relation to tissue composition, segment distribution, and motor function. I. Interspecific comparisons.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 47: 211–239.Google Scholar
  15. Greaves, W. S., 1985. The generalized carnivore jaw.Zool. J. Linnean Soc., 85: 267–274.Google Scholar
  16. Hamada, S., 1965. A study on the correlations between various measurements on human dental arch and those on the body.Nihon Univ. Dent. J., 39: 455–462. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  17. Hylander, W. L., 1975. Incisor size and diet in anthropoids with special reference to Cercopithecidae.Science, 189: 1095–1098.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. ————, 1979. The functional significance of primate mandibular form.J. Morphol., 160: 223–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. ————, 1985. Mandibular function and biomechanical stress and scaling.Amer. Zoologist, 25: 315–330.Google Scholar
  20. Kanazawa, E., 1987. Interspecific allometry of the mandibular measurements in primates. (unpub. data).Google Scholar
  21. ————,M. Sekikawa, &T. Ozaki, 1987. Correlations between dimensions of human teeth, dental arch and a mandible.J. Nihon Univ. Sch. Dent., 29: 165–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. ————, ————, & ————, 1988. Morphological relationship between teeth and a mandible in colobus monkeys.Nihon Univ. J. Oral Sci., 14: 189–201.Google Scholar
  23. Kay, R. F., 1975. Allometry and early hominids.Science, 189: 61–64.Google Scholar
  24. Kurtén, B., 1967. Quantitative approaches to dental microevolution.J. Dent. Res., 46: 817–828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lauer, C., 1975. The relationship of tooth size to body size in a population of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 43: 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, R. &K. Saller, 1957.Lehrbuch der Anthropologie. Gustav-Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  27. Picq, P. G., 1987. Mandibular scaling of African catarrhines with emphasis on biomechanics and sexual and diet differences.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 72: 242. (Proc. of 56th AAPA meeting, New York)Google Scholar
  28. Pilbeam, D. &S. J. Gould, 1974. Size and scaling in human evolution.Science, 186: 892–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Post, D., S. Goldstein, &D. Melnick, 1978. An analysis of cercopithecoid odontometrics. II. Relations between dental dimorphism, body size dimorphism and diet.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 49: 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenberger, A. L. &W. G. Kinzey, 1976. Functional patterns of molar occlusion in platyrrhine primates.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 45: 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shea, B. T., 1983. Size and diet in the evolution of African ape craniodental form.Folia Primatol., 40: 32–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, R. J., 1981. On the definition of variables of primate dental allometry.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 55: 323–329.Google Scholar
  33. ————, 1983. The mandibular corpus of female primates: taxonomic, dietrary, and allometric correlates of interspecific variations in size and shape.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 61: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snedecor, G. W. &W. C. Cochran, 1967.Statistical Methods (6th ed.). Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
  35. Sokal, R. R. &F. J. Rohlf, 1969.Biometry. W. H. Freedman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  36. Solow, B., 1966. The patterns of craniofacial associations.Acta Odontol. Scand., 24 (Suppl.): 1–174.Google Scholar
  37. Stahl, W. R., 1965. Organ weights in primates and other mammals.Science, 150: 1039–1042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Steudel, K., 1982. Patterns of intraspecific allometry in Old World primates.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59: 419–430.Google Scholar
  39. Tenney, S. M. &J. E. Remmers, 1963. Comparative quantitative morphology of the mammalian lung: diffusing area.Nature, 197: 54–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams, G., 1956. The relationships between the length of the jaw and the length of the molar series in some eutherian mammals.Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 126: 51–64.Google Scholar
  41. Walker, A., 1978. Functional anatomy of oral tissues: mastication and deglutition. In:Textbook of Oral Anatomy,J. H. Shaw,E. A. Sweeney,C. C. Cappuccine, &S. M. Meller (eds.), W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 277–296.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eisaku Kanazawa
    • 1
  • A. L. Rosenberger
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyNihon University School of Dentistry at MatsudoChibaJapan
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations