Primates

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 511–521

Tool use in capuchin monkeys: Distinguishing between performing and understanding

  • Elisabetta Visalberghi
  • Loredana Trinca
Article

Abstract

A horizontal plexiglas tube containing a food-reward was presented to four naive tufted capuchins and suitable sticks were provided to push the reward out. Three monkeys out of four spontaneously used the tools and showed very different styles of solving the task. In more complex conditions, in which the sticks needed to be combined or actively modified in order to become effective, the monkeys were always successful; however, their performance was loaded with errors which did not disappear throughout the trials. Evidence of a difference between success in solving the problem and its understanding was found. This suggests that although capuchins can discover new means through active experimentation, they do not mentally represent the characteristics necessary for a tool to be effective, nor do they modify the tool appropriately beforehand. At this level, a major difference with chimpanzees emerges.

Key Words

Tool use Cebus apella Mental representation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, J., 1974. Observation study of behavior: Sampling methods.Behaviour, 49: 337–367.Google Scholar
  2. Antinucci, F. &E. Visalberghi, 1986. Tool use inCebus apella: A case study.Int. J. Primatol., 7: 349–361.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, E., 1979.The Emergence of Symbols. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, B. B., 1980.Animal Tool Behavior. Garland Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Boesch, C. & E. Boesch, 1988. Tool use and tool making in wild chimpanzees. Colloque International de la Fondation Fyssen,L'usage de l'outil chez les primates humains et non-humains, Versailles, November 25–29.Google Scholar
  6. ———— &H. Boesch, 1983. Optimisation of nut-cracking with natural hammers by wild chimpanzees.Behaviour, 83: 265–286.Google Scholar
  7. Boinski, S., 1988. Use of a club by a wild white-faced capuchin (Cebus capucinus) to attack a venomous snake (Bothrops asper).Amer. J. Primatol., 14(2): 177–179.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, L. R. &H. F. Harlow, 1961. Note on a cebus monkey's use of a stick as a weapon.Psychol. Rep., 8: 418.Google Scholar
  9. Costello, M. B., 1987. Tool use and manufacture in manipulanda-deprived capuchins (Cebus apella).Amer. J. Primatol., 12(3): 337. (Abstract)Google Scholar
  10. Fedigan, L. M., in press. Vertebrate predation inCebus capucinus: meat eating in a neotropical monkey.Folia Primatol.Google Scholar
  11. Fragaszy, D. M. &E. Visalberghi, 1989. Social influences on the acquisition and use of tools in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).J. Comp. Psychol., 103: 159–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glickman, S. E. &S. W. Sroges, 1966. Curiosity in zoo animals.Behaviour, 26: 151–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodall, J., 1986.The Chimpanzees of Gombe. The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffstetter, R., 1974. Phylogeny and geographic deployment of the Primates.J. Human Evol., 3: 327–350.Google Scholar
  15. ————, 1980. Origin and deployment of New World monkeys emphasizing the southern continents route. In:Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift,R. L. Ciochon &B. Chiarelli (eds.), Plenum Press, New York & London, pp. 103–122.Google Scholar
  16. Kluver, H., 1933.Behavior Mechanisms in Monkeys. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. ————, 1937. Re-examination of implement-using behaviour in a cebus monkey after an interval of three years.Acta Psychol., 2: 347–397.Google Scholar
  18. Koehler, W., 1925.The Mentality of Apes. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  19. McGrew, W. C., 1974. Tool use by wild chimpanzees in feeding upon driver ants.J. Human Evol., 3: 501–508.Google Scholar
  20. ----, in press. Why is ape tool-use so confusing? In:Comparative Socioecology: the Behavioral Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals,V. Standen & R. Foley (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Parker, S. &K. R. Gibson, 1977. Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes.J. Human Evol., 6: 623–641.Google Scholar
  22. Poti', P. & S. T. Parker, in press. The role of innate fixed action patterns in ontogenetic and experiential development of intelligent use of sticks inCebus monkeys. In:Language and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes: Comparative Developmental Perspectives,S. T. Parker & K. Gibson (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Terborgh, J. W., 1983.Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  24. Visalberghi, E., 1987. The acquisition of nut-cracking behavior in two capuchin monkeys groups (Cebus apella).Folia Primatol., 49: 168–181.Google Scholar
  25. ————, 1988. Responsiveness to objects in two social groups of tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Amer. J. Primatol., 15: 349–360.Google Scholar
  26. ———— &W. A. Mason, 1983. Determinants of problem-solving success inSaimiri andCallicebus.Primates, 24: 385–396.Google Scholar
  27. Westergaard, G. C. &D. M. Fragaszy, 1985. Effects of manipulatable objects on the activity of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).Zoo Biol., 4: 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———— & ————, 1987. The manufacture and use of tools by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).J. Comp. Psychol., 2: 159–168.Google Scholar
  29. Yerkes, R. M., 1943.Chimpanzees. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  30. ———— &A. W. Yerkes, 1929.The Great Apes. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabetta Visalberghi
    • 1
  • Loredana Trinca
    • 1
  1. 1.Reparto di Psicologia ComparataIstituto di Psicologia, C. N. R.RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations