Hydrotechnical Construction

, Volume 2, Issue 7, pp 577–579 | Cite as

Earth-fill work in the winter on the Saratov Hydroelectric station

  • V. V. Nikiforov


  1. 1.

    In the winter time it was found possible to reduce the compaction requirements of the earth-fill work on the Saratov HES with satisfactory results. Attempts to impose more rigid requirements for some of the important structures led to negative results.

  2. 2.

    Earth-fill work during the winter must be regulated by the temperature regime and minimum conditions should be set up for each locality.

  3. 3.

    Winter work should be more exact and intensive in performance and requires added measures, such as warming of truckloads, clearing of snow, etc.

  4. 4.

    For any given specified density of fill, summer and winter work are different in the following respects:

  5. a)

    Winter work results in lesser uniformity, due to a greater number of more closely spaced boundaries between fill blocks and compaction blocks.

  6. b)

    Due to partial freezing even with normal compaction, winter fills will have alternate layers (or lenses) of frozen and unfrozen ground. These layers act as local water channels. In the spring and during winter thaws these layers are subject to irregular filling with water. In cases of frost recurrence the freezing causes an irregular pattern of partial decompaction of the soil.



Compaction Renewable Energy Source Water Channel Electrical Power Generation Minimum Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    A. F. Vasil'ev, “Lowering Costs of Dams Built of Moraine Materials”, No. 9, September, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. I. Yakovleva, “Compaction of Earth Dams”, No. 6, June, 1962.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. I. Lyandres, “Earth Dams of Bratsk Hydroelectric Station”, No. 5, May, 1962.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. N. Gudaev, “Evaluations of Soil Conditions in Utility Fills”, No. 12, December, 1963.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. A. Kornyukhin, “Dam Built of Maraine Clays”, No. 2, February, 1964.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. S. Reifman, “Tests on Vibro-rolling of Loess Materials for Cores of High-head Earth Dams”, No. 8, August, 1964.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. M. Respublikanskii, I. É. Fradkin, and A. A. Ukhov, “Earthquake on the Volga-Baltic Canal”, No. 8, August, 1964.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. V. Gapeshina, Yu. L. Muratov, and I. A. Shneer, “Earth Dams of Uch-Kurgan Hydroelectric Station”, No. 7, July, 1965.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. M. Reznikov, “Criteria for Density of Sands under Foundations”, No. 2, February, 1966.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. N. Moiseev, “Winter Work in Rock and Gravel Fills for Dams”, No. 3, March, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. I. Kudoyarov and N. P. Borodin, “Data on Construction of Saratov Hydroelectric Station”, No. 4, April, 1966.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu. D. Vidineev and B. S. Zalivadny, “Moisture Control in Earth Structures by Thermal Methods”, No. 12, December, 1966.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. I. Safronov, “Ground Compaction Equipment”, No. 1, January, 1967.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. F. Shchavelev and G. I. Kuznetsov, “Report of the Hydraulic Section of the Conference on Construction in Severe Climates”, No. 2, February, 1967.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. A. Bukin, “Dams of Moraine Earth-Fill at the Kovdin Rapids”, Nos. 2 and 4, February and April, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Civil Engineers 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. V. Nikiforov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations