Control of the operating regimes of water resources systems
- 17 Downloads
Conclusions
- 1.
The control of water resources systems with long-term regulation reservoirs should take into consideration the probabilistic nature of stream flow, that is, it should depend to a minimum degree, at least, upon the justifiability of the long-term hydrologic predictions.
- 2.
The control of water resources systems should be made as autonomous as possible, but using to the greatest possible extent the advantages of the combined operation of the reservoirs. This may be achieved, for example, by developing a rational hierarchical control structure for the system.
- 3.
The control of water resources systems should be flexible in connection with the random variations in the structure, the extent of consumption, and the limitations of the system.
- 4.
The Ministry of Reclamation and Water Management of the USSR, jointly with other interested departments, should examine the problem of the convenience of a systematic and centralized preparation of projects for the control of developing water resources systems with large reservoirs.
- 5.
It is necessary to develop and introduce into the water resources operating practice procedures for evaluation of the activities and for the encouragement of the material interests of operating personnel which would permit implementing to the greatest possible extent the plans for optimum control of water resources systems with large reservoirs.
Keywords
Stream Flow Control Structure Renewable Energy Source Electrical Power Generation Minimum DegreePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature Cited
- 1.A. Sh. Reznikovskii (editor), Water-Energy Analyses by the Monte Carlo Method [in Russian], Énergiya (1969).Google Scholar
- 2.I. Ya. Shimel'mits and M. I. Rubinshtein, “Water-energy bases of the Unified Power System of Siberia and of European USSR,” in: Productive Forces of Eastem Siberia [in Russian], Énergiya, Academy of Sciences of the USSR (1960).Google Scholar
- 3.N. A. Kartvelishvili, Theory of Stochastic Processes in Hydrology and Stream-Flow Regulation [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat (1967).Google Scholar
- 4.E. V. Tsvetkov, Methods of Computer Analysis of the Optimal Regulation of Stream Flow at the Reservoirs of Hydroelectric Plants [in Russian], Énergiya (1967).Google Scholar
- 5.G. G. Svanidze, Principles of the Analysis of Stream Flow by the Monte Carlo Method [in Russian], Metsniereba, Tbilisi (1964).Google Scholar
- 6.A. A. Beschinskii and A. Sh. Reznikovskii, “Economic methods and criteria used for the optimization of capital investments in water management,” Gidrotekh. Stroitel'., No. 9 (1970).Google Scholar
- 7.S. N. Kritskii and M. F. Menkel', “Types of stream flow regulation, methods of analysis, and implementation of measures,” in: Regulation of Stream Flow [in Bulgarian], Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia (1969).Google Scholar
- 8.M. Angelov, N. Godev, and K. Lazarov, “A multifactorial stochastic model of dispatching control of hydroelectric stations” [in Bulgarian], Energetika, Sofia, No. 10 (1969).Google Scholar
- 9.Yu. P. Syrov, “Optimization of the regimes of hydroelectric plants in systems of plants, from a probable form of flow information,” Izv. AN SSSR, Énergetika i Transport, No. 6 (1965).Google Scholar
- 10.L. S. Belyaev, “Optimal control of a power system containing hydroelectric plants, by using probabilistic methods,” Author's Abstract, Novosibirsk (1968).Google Scholar
- 11.S. N. Kritskii and M. F. Menkel', Water Resources Analyses [in Russian], Gidrometeoizdat (1952).Google Scholar