Effect of aluminium toxicity on root morphology of barley
Article
- 77 Downloads
- 25 Citations
Conclusion
The greater tolerance of Dayton to A1 can be explained by a longer resistance of the plasmalemma towards A1 stress. Whether a stronger mucigel production could be resonsible for increased A1 tolerance has to be examined in more detail.
Key Words
Al-toxicity Root morphology BarleyPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Baier, R., Münnich, H., Heinke, F. und Göring, H. 1976 Zytologische Untersuchungen zur Wirkung von Aluminium auf Maiswurzeln. Wiss. Z. d. Humboldt-Univ. zu Berlin, Math. Nat. R XXV, 840–844.Google Scholar
- 2.Foy, C. D., Armiger, W. H., Briggle, L. W. and Reid, D. A. 1965 Different aluminium tolerance of wheat and barley varieties in acid soils. Agron. J.57, 413–417.Google Scholar
- 3.Hecht-Buchholz, Ch. 1979 Calcium deficiency and plant ultrastructure. Commun. in Soil Science and Plant Analysis10, 67–81.Google Scholar
- 4.Hecht-Buchholz, Ch. 1978 Aluminium toxicity in barley—a light and electronmicroscopic study. Proc. of the 8th Intern. Colloquium on Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems Auckland, New Zealand, N.Z. DSIR Inform. 134, 179.Google Scholar
- 5.Henning, S. J. 1975 Aluminium toxicity in the primary meristem of wheat roots. Ph. D. Thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis Oregon.Google Scholar
- 6.McLean, F. T. and Gilbert, B. E. 1927 The relative aluminium tolerance of crop plants. Soil Sci.24, 163–175.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1981