Primates

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 21–56 | Cite as

Sociological study of a wild group of hybrid baboons betweenPapio anubis andP. hamadryas in the Awash Valley, Ethiopia

  • Kazuyoshi Sugawara
Article

Abstract

A group of hybrid baboons between anubis and hamadryas named the Gorge group was studied for five months in the Awash Valley, Ethiopia. Both morphologically and genetically, anubis features were prevalent in the Gorge group. Three types of subgroups within the group were distinguished: one-male groups, pair groups, and multi-male groups. The joining and parting of subgroups is examined by cluster-analysis. The Gorge group is concluded to be a single social unit, though it was composed of two main clusters. Grooming relations, spacing mechanisms, and sexual relations among its members were analyzed in detail. The dominance relationships among males are clarified in order to be related with their social interactions. Various aspects of the social organization are compared with those of anubis or hamadryas. It is demonstrated that the social structure of the Gorge group showed an intricate mixture of anubis and hamadryas characteristics. It is discussed how such a structure had been formed through hybridization, and what were the factors causing the differences among three types of subgroups.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldrich-Blake, F. P. G., T. Bunn, R. Dunbar, &P. Headley, 1971. Observations on baboons,Papio anubis, in an arid region in Ethiopia.Folia primat., 15: 1–35.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, S. A. &J. Altmann, 1970.Baboon Ecology: African Field Study. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, I. S., 1966. Naturally occurring primates hybrid.Science, 154: 1559–1560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. ————, 1968. Social status of two hybrids in a wild troop ofMacaca irus.Folia primat., 8: 121–131.Google Scholar
  5. Chance, M. R. A., 1967. Attention structures as the basis of primate rank orders.Man, 2: 503–518.Google Scholar
  6. Dunbar, R. I. M. &P. Dunbar, 1974. On hybridization betweenTheropithecus gelada andPapio anubis in the wild.J. Human Evol., 3: 187–192.Google Scholar
  7. Fooden, J., 1964. Rhesus and crab-eating macaques: Intergradation in Thailand.Science, 143: 363–365.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, K. R. L. &I. DeVore, 1965. Baboon social behavior. In:Primate Behavior: Field Study of Monkeys and Apes,I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 53–110.Google Scholar
  9. Hanby, J. P., 1975. The social nexus: Problems and solutions in the portrayal of primate social structure.Proceed. 5th Cong. Int. Primat. Soc., Japan Science Press, Tokyo, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar
  10. Hausfater, G., 1975.Dominance and Reproduction in Baboons (Papio cynocephalus):A Quantitative Analysis. Contributions to Primatology, Vol. 7, Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  11. Kawai, M., 1958. On the rank system in a natural group of Japanese monkey (I): The basic and dependent rank.Primates, 1: 111–130.Google Scholar
  12. ————, 1976. Hybridization and evolution of primates (II): Speciation and hominization.Shizen, 31(12): 64–73. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. Kummer, H., 1968.Social Organization of Hamadryas Baboons: A Field Study. S. Karger, Basel and Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. ————, 1971.Primate Societies: Group Techniques of Ecological Adaptation. Aldine-Atherton, Inc., Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. ————, 1973. Dominance versus possession: An experiment on hamadryas baboons.Proceed. 4th Int. Congr. Primat., Vol. 1:Precultural Primate Behavior, Karger, Basel. pp. 226–231.sc————Google Scholar
  16. ————, 1970. Cross-species modification of social behavior in baboons. In:Old World Monkeys: Evolution, Systematics, and Behavior,J. R. Napier &P. H. Napier (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 351–363.Google Scholar
  17. ————, ————, & ————, 1974. Triadic differentiation: An inhibitory process protecting pair bonds in baboons.Behaviour, 49: 62–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maples, W. R., 1972. Systematic reconsideration and revision of the nomenclature of Kenya baboons.Amer. J. phys. Anthrop., 36: 9–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Morgan, B. J. T., M. J. A. Simpson, J. P. Hanby, &J. Hall-Craggs, 1976. Visualizing interaction and sequential data in animal behavior: Theory and application of cluster-analysis methods.Behaviour, 59: 1–43.Google Scholar
  20. Nagel, U., 1971. Social organization in a baboon hybrid zone.Proceed. 3rd Int. Congr. Primat., Vol. 3., Karger, Basel, pp. 48–57.Google Scholar
  21. ————, 1973. A comparison of anubis baboons, hamadryas baboons and their hybrids at a species border in Ethiopia.Folia primat., 19: 104–165.Google Scholar
  22. Nishida, T., 1970. Social behavior and relationship among wild chimpanzees of the Mahali mountains.Primates, 11: 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Packer, C., 1977. Intertroop transfer and inbreeding avoidance inPapio anubis. Doct. Dissertation, Univ. of Sussex.Google Scholar
  24. Sade, D. S., 1967. Determinants of dominance in a group of free-ranging rhesus monkeys. In:Social Communication among Primates,S. A. Altmann (ed.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
  25. Shotake, T., K. Nozawa, &Y. Tanabe, 1977. Blood protein variations in baboons: I. Gene exchange and genetic distance betweenPapio anubis, Papio hamadryas, and their hybrid.Japan J. Genetics, 52(3): 223–237.Google Scholar
  26. Struhsaker, T. T., 1970. Phylogenetic implications of some vocalizations ofCercopithecus monkeys. In:Old World Monkeys: Evolution, Systematics, and Behavior,J. R. Napier &P. H. Napier (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 365–405.Google Scholar
  27. Tokuda, K., 1961. A study of the sexual behavior in the Japanese monkey troop.Primates, 3: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuyoshi Sugawara
    • 1
  1. 1.Primate Research InstituteKyoto University, Kanrin, InuyamaAichiJapan

Personalised recommendations