Entomophaga

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 363–372 | Cite as

Toxicity of a number of pesticides to strains ofTyphlodromus pyri andAmblyseius andersoni (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

  • C. Duso
  • P. Camporese
  • L. P. S. van der Geest
Article

Abstract

Side effects of ten pesticides used in orchards and vineyards were tested with a laboratory method on several Dutch and Italian strains of the predatory mitesTyphlodromus pyri Scheuten andAmblyseius andersoni (Chant). Resistant and susceptible strains of both species were studied. Results showed that a test which evaluates mortality of various developmental stages and fecundity of adult females is better than one that measures only survival of adult females. A definite resistance to certain pesticides was found in ItalianT. pyri andA. andersoni. The level of resistance to parathion, azinphos-methyl and carbaryl was particularly high in some strains ofA. andersoni. The high level of resistance to certain pesticides was often associated with a marked reduction in fecundity.

Key-Words

Typhlodromus pyri Amblyseius andersoni pesticides side effects resistance 

Résumé

Les effects secondaires de 10 pesticides fréquemment employés dans les vergers et les vignobles ont été étudiés en laboratoire sur 8 souches d'acariens prédateursTyphlodromus pyri etAmblyseius andersoni. Ces effects ont été testés sur des souches considérées comme sensibles ou résistantes au parathion au cours d'essais préliminaires. Certaines souches ont démontré une certaine tolérance ou résistance à plusieurs pesticides. Un haut facteur de résistance au parathion, azinphos-méthyl et carbaryl a été trouvé dans des souches deA. andersoni originaires de cultures différentes mais une réduction marquée de la fécondité a été démontrée après l'emploi de certaines insecticides. Les résultats montrent l'importance qu'il y a d'évaluer non seulement la mortalité ou le facteur de résistance aux pesticides mais aussi l'effet sur la fécondité des femelles adultes. Ces aspects sont discutés dans le cadre de la lutte intégrée.

Mots Clés

Typhlodromus pyri Amblyseius andersoni pesticides effects secondaires résistance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anber, H. A. I. &Overmeer, W. P. J. —1988. Resistance to organophosphates and carbamates in the predacious miteAmblyseius potentillae (Garman) due to insensitive acetylcholinesterase. —Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 31, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anber, H. A. I. &Oppenoorth, F. J. —1989. A mutant esterase degrading organophosphates in a resistant strain of the predacious miteAmblyseius potentillae (Garman). —Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 33, 1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babcock, J. M. &Tanigoshi, L. K. —1988. Resistant levels ofTyphlodromus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Washington apple orchards to ten pesticides. —Exp. appl. Acarol., 4, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baillod, M., Guignard, E. & Kreiter, S. —1985. Toxicité de quelques insecticides pour une souche deTyphlodromus pyri Scheuten (Fully, Valais, Suisse) et une souche deAmblyseius andersoni Chant (Cugnasco, Tessin, Suisse) et détermination de leur résistance en laboratoire (Acari, Phytoseiidae). —Int. Symp.: Influenza degli antiparassitari sulla fauna utile in frutticoltura. Verona-Venezia, 28–30 maggio 1985, 25–30.Google Scholar
  5. Blommers, L. H. M. & Overmeer, W. P. J.—1986. On the fringes of natural spider mite control.—Bull. SROP, 1986/IX/4, 48–61.Google Scholar
  6. Chant, D. A. &Yoshida-Shaul, E. —1990. The identities ofAmblyseius andersoni (Chant) andAmblyseius potentillae (Garmán) in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). —Int. J. Acarol., 16, 5–12.Google Scholar
  7. Croft, B. A. —1982. Arthropod resistance to insecticides: a key to pest control failures and successes in North american apple orchards. —Ent. exp. appl., 31, 88–110.Google Scholar
  8. Croft, B. A. &Jeppson, L. R. —1970. Comparative studies on four strains ofTyphlodromus occidentalis: laboratory toxicity of ten compounds common to apple pest control. —J. Econ. Entomol., 63, 1528–1531.Google Scholar
  9. Duso, C. — 1985. Effetti collaterali di alcuni insetticidi su Acari Fitoseidi del pesco. —Int. Symp.: Influenza degli antiparassitari sulla fauna utile in frutticoltura. Verona-Venezia, 28–30 maggio 1985, 107–120.Google Scholar
  10. Dusco, C. — Biological control of tetranychid mites in peach orchards of Northern Italy. Role ofAmblyseius andersoni (Chant) andAmblyseius finlandicus (Oud.) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). —IOBC Int. Symp. “Integrated Plant Protection”, Godollo, 1990 (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Duso, C. &Pavan F. —1986. Il controllo delle Tignole della vite (Lobesia botrana Den. e Schiff.:Eupoecilia ambiguella Hb.). 2. Considerazioni sugli effetti collaterali di insetticidi diversi. —Riv. viticol. Enol. Conegliano, 39, 304–312.Google Scholar
  12. Duso, C. &Sbrissa, F. —1990. Gli Acari Fitoseidi del melo nell'Italia settentrionale: distribuzione, ecologia ed importanza economica. —Boll. Zool. agr. Bachic., 22, 53–89.Google Scholar
  13. Hassan, S. A. et al. — 1983. Results of the second joint pesticide testing programme by the IOBC/WPRS-Working group “Pesticides and Benefical Arthropods”. —Z. angew. Entomol., 95, 151–158.Google Scholar
  14. Hassan, S. A. et al. — 1987. Results of the third joint pesticide testing programme by the IOBC/WPRS-Working group “Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms”. —Z. angew. Entomol., 103, 92–107.Google Scholar
  15. Hassan, S. A. et al. — 1988. Results of the fourth joint pesticide testing programme carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working group “Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms”. —Z. angew. Entomol., 105, 321–329.Google Scholar
  16. Hoy, M. A. &Knop, N. F. — 1979. Studies on pesticide resistance in the phytoseiid miteMetaseiulus occidentalis in California. — In:Recent Advances in Acarology,J. G. Rodriguez Ed.,Acad. Press.,N. Y., vol. I, 89–94.Google Scholar
  17. Ioriatti, C. &Baillod, M. — 1987. Determinatione della tossicità di 15 insetticidi su un ceppo diAmblyseius andersoni Chant (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). —Vignevini, 5, 49–52.Google Scholar
  18. Ivancich Gambaro, P. —1975. Selezione di popolazioni di Acari predatori resistenti ad alcuni insetticidi fosforati-organici. —Inf. fitopatol., 7, 21–25.Google Scholar
  19. McMurtry, J. A., Mahr, D. L. &Johnson, H. G. —1976. Geographic races in the predaceous miteAmblyseius potentillae (Garman) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). —Int. J. Acarol., 2, 23–29.Google Scholar
  20. Messing, R. &Croft, B. A. —1991. Biosystematics inAmblyseius andersoni (Chant) andAmblyseius potentillae (Garman). —Exp. appl. Acarol., 10, 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Overmeer, W. P. J. —1981. Notes on the breeding phytoseiid mites from orchards (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in the laboratory. —Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent, 46, 503–509.Google Scholar
  22. Overmeer, W. P. J. —1985. Toxicological methods. — In:Spider Mites: their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control (Helle, W. &Sabelis, M. W., Eds.)Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, vol. 2, 183–189.Google Scholar
  23. Overmeer, W. P. J. &Van Zon, A. Q. —1981. A comparative study on the effect of some pesticides on three predacious mites species:Typhlodromus pyri, Amblyseius potentillae andA. bibens (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). —Entomophaga, 26, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Overmeer, W. P. J. &Van Zon, A. Q. —1982. A standardized method for testing side effects of pesticides on the predacious miteAmblyseius potentillae (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). —Entomophaga, 27, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Overmeer, W. P. J. &Van Zon, A. Q. —1983. Resistance to parathion in the predacious miteTyphlodromus pyri Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). —Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent, 48, 247–251.Google Scholar
  26. Strapazzon, A. &Dalla Montà, L. —1988. Ruolo e distribuzione diAmblyseius andersoni (Chant) eZetzellia mali Ewing in meleti infestati daAculus schlechtendali (Nal.). —Redia. 71, 39–54.Google Scholar
  27. Van de Baan, H. E., Kuijpers, L. A. M., Overmeer, W. P. J. &Oppenoorth, F. J. —1984. Organophosphorous and carbamate resistance in the predacious miteTyphlodromus pyri due to insensitive acetyl cholinesterase. —Exp. appl. Acarol., 1, 3–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lavoisier Abonnements 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Duso
    • 1
  • P. Camporese
    • 1
  • L. P. S. van der Geest
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Agricultural EntomologyUniversity of PaduaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Pure and Applied EcologyUniversity of AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations