Advertisement

Entomophaga

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 285–294 | Cite as

Taxonomy of the genusTrichogramma (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Trichogrammatidae)

  • S. E. Flanders
  • Wolfgang Quednau
Mémoires Originaux

Keywords

Biological Entity Fore Wing Ovipositor Sheath Trichogramma Species Oriental Fruit Moth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Résumé

Dans le genreTrichogramma, il existe d'une part un certain nombre d'espèces et, d'autre part, beaucoup de formes biologiques caractérisées seulement par leur comportement. Les espèces bien distinctes par leur morphologie sont:T. evanescensWestwood,T. embryophagum (Hartig),T. semblidis (Aur.,T. minutumRiley,T. japonicumAsh. etT. retorridum (Gir.). La valeur d'une espèce deTrichogramma est établie par le mode de reproduction, la variation de la coloration, la durée du cycle évolutif et les différences des soies des antennes chez les mâles, et tout cela pour une température haute et constante (30°C). La connaissance des modifications physiologiques et des changements de coloration d'une espèce en fonction de l'habitat est importante pour les études taxonomiques qu'il faut exécuter avec un matériel vivant. La tâche d'un taxonomiste deTrichogramma est biologiquement difficile, mais son importance pour l'agriculture est considérable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Bennett, Fred &I. W. Hughes. — 1959. Biological control of insect pests in Bermuda. —Bull. ent. Res.,50, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowen, M. F. — 1936. A biometrical study of two morphologically similar species ofTrichogramma. —Ann. ent. Soc. America,29, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brues, C.T. — 1908. The correlation between habits and structural characters among parasiticHymenoptera. —Jour. econ. Ent.,1, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clausen, C. P. — 1936. Insect parasitism and biological control. —Ann. ent. Soc. America,29, 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clausen, C. P. 1940. Entomophagous Insects.McGraw-Hill, N. Y. 688 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Compere, H — 1955. A systematic study of the genusAphytis Howard (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) with descriptions of new species. —Univ. California Publ. Ent.,10, 271–320.Google Scholar
  7. Doutt, R. L. — 1954. An evaluation of some natural enemies of the olive scale. —Jour. econ. Ent.,47, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans, J. W. — 1930. The control of codling moth in Australia. —Jour. Council Sci. Ind. Res.,3, 106–116.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrière, C. — 1947. Les espèces ou races biologiques deTrichogramma (Hym. Chalc.). —Verhandl. schweiz. naturforsch. Ges.,127, 92–93.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrière, Ch. &J. C. Faure — 1924. SurTrichogramma evanescens Westw. parasite des œufs dePieris brassicae L. —Rev. Path. vég., Entomol. agr. France,11, 104–118.Google Scholar
  11. Flanders, S. E. — 1931. The temperature relationships ofTrichogramma minutum as a basis for racial segregation. —Hilgardia,5, 395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. — 1935a. Two described species ofTrichogramma validated. —Pan-Pacific Ent.,11, 79.Google Scholar
  13. — 1935b. Host influence on the prolificacy and size ofTrichogramma. —Pan-Pacific Ent.,11, 175–177.Google Scholar
  14. — 1936. The biology ofTrichogramma evanescens Westw. and allied species. Doctorate Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  15. — 1937. Habitat selection byTrichogramma. —Ann. Ent. Soc. America,30, 208–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. — 1938. Identity of the common species of AmericanTrichogramma. —Jour. econ. Ent.,31, 456.Google Scholar
  17. — 1944. Observations onComperiella bifasciata, an endoparasite of diaspine coccids. —Ann. Ent. Soc. America,37, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. — 1945. The bisexuality of uniparentalHymenoptera, a function of the environment. —Amer. Nat.,79, 122–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. — 1957. Fig scale parasites introduced into California. —Jour. econ. Ent.,50, 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Girault, A. A. — 1906.Trichogramma pretiosa Riley: Colour variations in the adult with description of a new variety. —Canadian Ent.,38, 81–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. — 1911a. Synonymic and descriptive notes on the chalcidoid familyTrichogrammatidae with description of new species. —Trans Amer. Ent. Soc.,37, 43–83.Google Scholar
  22. — 1911b. On the identity of(Trichogramma) Neotrichogramma japonicum (Ashmead) —Canadian Ent.,43, 192–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. — 1911c. On the identity of the most common species of the familyTrichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera). —Bull. Wisconsin Nat. Hist. Soc.,9, 135–165.Google Scholar
  24. Harland, S. C. &O. M. Atteck. — 1933. Breeding experiments with biological races ofTrichogramma minutum in the West Indies. —Z. indukt. Abstammungsu. Vererbungslehre,64, 54–76.Google Scholar
  25. Howard, L. O. & W.F. Fiske. — 1911. The importation into the United States of the parasites of the gipsy moth and the brown-tail moth. —U. S. Dept. Agric. Bur. Ent. Bull.,91, 312 p.Google Scholar
  26. Kryger, J. P. — 1919. The EuropeanTrichogramminae. —Ent. Meddel.,12 (2 Ser. 7), 257–354.Google Scholar
  27. Kurdjumov N. V. — 1912. Synonymic note on someTrichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera). —Rev. Russe d'Ent.,12, 283.Google Scholar
  28. Marchal, P. — 1927. Contribution à l'étude génotypique et phénotypique des Trichogrammes. Les lignées naturelles de Trichogrammes. —Acad. des Sci Colon, France, Compt. Rend.,185, 489–493, 521–523.Google Scholar
  29. Muesebeck, C. F., Karl V. Krombein & H. K. Townes. — 1951.Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico (Synoptic Catalog). —U. S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Monogr.,2, 1 420 p.Google Scholar
  30. Packard, A. S. — 1880. Description of some new ichneumon parasites of North American butterflies. —Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. Proc.,21, 18–38.Google Scholar
  31. Pagden, H. T. — 1934. Notes on hymenopterous parasites of Padi pests in Malaya. —Sci. Ser. Dept. Agric. S. S. and F. M. S.,15, 13 p.Google Scholar
  32. Peck, W. D. — 1799. Natural history of the slug-worm. Papers on Agriculture. —Massachusetts Soc. for Promoting Agric.,1798, 9–20.Google Scholar
  33. Perkins, R. C. L. — 1907. Parasites of leaf-hoppers. —Ent. Ser. Exp. Sta. Haw. Sugar Pl. Assoc. Bull.,4, 66 p.Google Scholar
  34. Perkins, R. C. L. — 1912. Parasites of insects attacking sugar cane. —Ent. Ser. Exp. Sta. Haw. Sugar Pl. Assoc. Bull.,10, 27 p.Google Scholar
  35. — 1914. On the hymenopterous generaTrichogramma Westw., andPentarthron RileyEnt. Soc. London, Trans.,4, 603–605.Google Scholar
  36. Peterson, Alvaii. — 1930. How many species ofTrichogramma occur in North America? —Jour. New York Ent. Soc.,38, 1–7.Google Scholar
  37. Prosser, C. L. — 1959. The “Origin” after a century: prospects for the future. —Amer. Sci.,47, 536–550.Google Scholar
  38. Quednau, Wolfgang — 1956. Die biologischen Kriterien zur Unterscheidung vonTrichogramma-arten. —Ztschr. f. Pflanzenkrank. u Pflanzenschutz,63, 333–344.Google Scholar
  39. Riley, C. V. — 1879. Parasites of the cotton worm. —Canadian Ent.,11, 161–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Salt, George — 1937. The egg-parasite ofSialis lutaria: a study of the influence of the host upon a dimorphic parasite. —Parasitology,29, 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. . — 1941. The effects of hosts upon their insect parasites. —Biol. Rev.,16, 235–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spencer, H., Luther Brown & A. M. Phillips. — 1949. Use of the parasiteTrichogramma minutum for controlling pecan insects. —U. S. Dept. Agric. Circ., 818, 17 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Van Steenburgh, W. E. — 1934.Trichogramma minutum Riley as a parasite of the oriental fruit moth (Laspeyresia molesta Busck in Ontario. —Canad. Jour. Res.,10, 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walker, F. — 1851. Notes on Chalcidites and descriptions of various new species. —Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist.,7, 210–216.Google Scholar
  45. Webster, R. L. — 1912. The pear slug. —Iowa Expt. Sta. Bull.,130, 167–192.Google Scholar
  46. Westwood, J. O. — 1833. Descriptions of several new British forms amongst the parasitic hymenopterous insects. —London, Edinb., and Dublin Phil. Mag. and Jour. Sci.,2, 444.Google Scholar
  47. — 1879. Descriptions of some minute hymenopterous insects. —Linn. Soc. London, Trans. Zool.,1, 583–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Le François 1960

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. E. Flanders
  • Wolfgang Quednau

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations