Federal laboratories: Economic development and intellectual property constraints
- 64 Downloads
- 6 Citations
Abstract
The United States is increasingly looking at ways to link public-sector investments in science and technology with national economic-development goals. The federal laboratories are a reflection of this trend and much has been done to make them a more attractive source for innovative ideas in the private sector. One significant change that has resulted in making the laboratories more interactive with US industry has been the easing of government patent policy for both government-and contractor-operated national laboratories. However, there still are intellectual-property constraints, especially in the areas of technical data and software, that need immediate attention if the full intent of technology-transfer legislation is to be met.
Keywords
Reflection United States Economic Growth Economic Development Private SectorPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.National Science Foundation (1988).Federal Funds for Research, Development and R&D Plant for Fiscal Years 1986, 1987, and 1988. Washington, DC: Table C-1.Google Scholar
Recommended reading
- 1.Department of Energy National Cooperative Research Initiatives Act (S. 1480), Amendment No. 1627 (1988, March). Washington DC.Google Scholar
- 2.Executive Order No. 12591 (1987, April 10).Facilitating Access to Science and Technology. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 3.Ling, James (1987, October).Technology Transfer Opportunities at Federal Laboratories. Materials and Processing Report, Cambridge, MA. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
- 4.Martin Marietta Energy Systems (1987, June).Interactions with Energy Systems. Pp. F-1-F-5.Google Scholar
- 5.Government Patent Policy. Apresidential memorandum to the heads of executive departments and agencies (Feb. 18, 1983). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 6.Stevenson-Wydler Innovation Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-480). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 7.Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-517). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 8.The Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-502). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 9.Superconductivity Competitiveness Act of 1988 (1988, February). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 10.US General Accounting Office (1988, March).Technology Transfer: Constraints Perceived by Federal Agency and Laboratory Officials. GAO/RCED 88-116BR. Washington, DC: pp 10–18.Google Scholar
- 11.US General Accounting Office (1987, April).Patent Policy: Recent Changes Seen as Beneficial. GAO/RCED 87-44. Washington, DC: pp. 18–44.Google Scholar