Plant and Soil

, Volume 104, Issue 1, pp 3–11

Elevated atmospheric CO2 effects on seedling growth, nutrient uptake, and rhizosphere bacterial populations ofLiriodendron tulipifera L.

  • E. G. O'Neill
  • R. J. Luxmoore
  • R. J. Norby
Article

Abstract

Yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) seedlings were planted in unfertilized forest soil in boxes with a removable side panel and grown in atmospheres containing either ambient (367 μl l−1) or elevated (692 μl l−1) CO2. Numbers of total bacteria, nitrifiers, and phosphate-dissolving bacteria in the rhizosphere and in nonrhizosphere soil were measured every 6 weeks for 24 weeks. Seedling growth and nutrient content were measured at a final whole-plant harvest. Root, leaf, and total dry weights were significantly greater, and specific leaf area was significantly less, in 692 ml l−1 than in ambient CO2. Uptake per gram plant dry weight of N, S, and B was lower at elevated CO2, whereas uptake of P, K, Cu, Al, and Fe was proportional to growth in both CO2 treatments. Total uptake and uptake per g plant dry weight of Ca, Mg, Sr, Ba, Zn, and Mn were not affected by CO2 treatment. Bacterial populations differed due to CO2 only at the final harvest, where there were significantly fewer nitrite-oxidizers and phosphate-dissolving bacteria in the rhizosphere of seedlings grown at 692 μl l−1 CO2.

Key words

elevated CO2 nitrifiers phosphate-dissolving bacteria rhizosphere yellow-poplar 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander M 1961 Introduction to Soil Microbiology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 467 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander M and Clark F E 1965 Nitrifying bacteria.In Methods of Soil Analysis. II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Ed. C E Black, pp 1477–1482. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  3. Allen P J 1942 Changes in the metabolism of wheat leaves induced by infection with powdery mildew. Am. J. Bot. 29, 425–435.Google Scholar
  4. Azcon R, Barea J M and Hayman D S 1976 Utilization of rock phosphate in alkaline soils by plants inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Soil Biol. Biochem. 8, 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babiuk L A and Paul E A 1970 The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 16, 57–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker D N and Enoch H Z 1983 Plant growth and development.In CO2 and Plants. Ed. E R Lemon. pp 107–130. AAAS Selected Symposium 84, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  7. Daley R J and Hobbie J E 1975 Direct counts of aquatic bacteria by a modified epifluorescence technique. Limn. and Ocean. 20, 875–882.Google Scholar
  8. Epstein E 1972 Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Prospectives. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 412 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Fenwick L 1973 Studies on the rhizosphere microflora of onion plants in relation to temperature changes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher R A and Yates F 1963 Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural, and Medical Research Oliver and Boyd, London, 146 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Fresquez P R and Lindemann W C 1982 Soil and rhizosphere microorganisms in amended coal mine spoils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 751–755.Google Scholar
  12. Gray L E and Gerdemann J W 1967 Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas on the uptake of Phosphorus-32 byLiriodendron tulipifera andLiquidambar styraciflua. Nature 213, 106–107.Google Scholar
  13. Harley J L and Smith S E 1983 Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, New York, 483 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Katznelson H, Peterson E A and Rouatt J W 1962 Phosphatedissolving microorganisms on seed and in the root zone of plants. Can. J. Bot. 40, 1181–1186.Google Scholar
  15. Kauri T 1980 Rapid multipoint method for quantification of various physiological groups of bacteria in soil. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 12, 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kimball B A 1983 Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: An assemblage and analysis of 430 prior observations. Agron. J. 75, 779–788.Google Scholar
  17. Kramer P 1981 Carbon dioxide concentration, photosynthesis, and dry matter production. Bioscience 31, 29–33.Google Scholar
  18. Leaf A L 1973 Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing forests. pp 427–454.In Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Eds. L M Walsh and J D Beaton. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  19. Luther F M and Cess R D 1985 Review of the recent carbon dioxide-climate controversy.In Projecting the Climatic Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Eds. M C MacCraken and F M Luther, pp 321–335. DOE/ER-0237, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Norby R J, Luxmoore R J, O'Neill E G and Weller D G 1984 Plant responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 with emphasis on belowground processes. ORNL/TM-9426, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, 141 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Norby R J, O'Neill E G and Luxmoore R J 1986 Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the growth and mineral nutrition ofQuercus alba seedlings. Plant Physiol. 82, 83–89.Google Scholar
  22. O'Neill E G, Luxmoore R J and Norby R J 1985 Stimulation of mycorrhizal colonization at elevated atmospheric CO2. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 66, 240.Google Scholar
  23. Paul N B and Sundara Rao W V B 1971 Phosphate-dissolving bacteria in the rhizosphere of some cultivated legumes. Plant and Soil 35, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raj J, Bagyaraj D J and Manjunath A 1981 Influence of soil inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza and a phosphate-dissolving bacterium on plant growth and32P-uptake. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13, 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rouatt J W and Katznelson H 1960 Influence of light on bacterial flora of roots. Nature 186, 659–660.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rouatt J W, Peterson E A, Katznelson H and Henderson V E 1963 Microorganisms in the root zone in relation to temperature. Can. J. Microbiol. 9, 227–236.Google Scholar
  27. Routien J B and Dawson R F 1943 Some interrelationships of growth, salt absorption, respiration, and mycorrhizal development inPinus echinata. Mill. Am. J. Bot. 30, 440–451.Google Scholar
  28. Scaglia J, Lensi R and Chalamet A 1985 Relationship between photosynthesis and denitrification in planted soil. Plant and Soil 84, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Solomon A M, Trabalka J R, Reichle D E and Voorhees L D 1985 The global cycle of carbon.In Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and the Global Carbon Cycle. Ed. J R Trabalka, pp 3–13. DOE/ER-0239, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  30. Thomas J F and Harvey C 1983 Leaf anatomy of four species grown under continuous CO2 enrichment. Bot. Gaz. 144, 303–309.Google Scholar
  31. Tinker P B and Sanders F E 1975 Rhizosphere microorganisms and plant nutrition. Soil Sci. 119, 363–368.Google Scholar
  32. Van Vuurde J W L and DeLange A 1978 The rhizosphere microflora of wheat grown under controlled condition. II. Influence of the stage of growth of the plant, soil fertility, and leaf treatment with urea on the rhizosphere soil microflora. Plant and Soil 50, 461–472.Google Scholar
  33. Vrany J 1963 Effect of foliar application of urea on the root microflora. Folia Microbiol. 8, 351–355.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. G. O'Neill
    • 1
  • R. J. Luxmoore
    • 1
  • R. J. Norby
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations