Plant and Soil

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 491–495 | Cite as

Effects of a soil fulvic acid on the growth and nutrient content of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants

  • B. S. Rauthan
  • M. Schnitzer
Short Communications

Summary

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants were grown in Hoagland solution to which 20 to 2000 ppm of a soil fulvic acid (FA) were added. The addition of 100 to 300 ppm of FA produced highly significant increases in the growth and development of above and below ground plant parts, in the uptake of nutrient elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe and Zn), and in the formation of numbers of flowers per plant. Effects of adding 500 and more ppm of FA were less beneficial.

Key words

Calcium Copper Flowers Iron Leaves Magnesium Nitrogen Nutrient uptake Phosphorus Potassium Koots Shoots Zinc 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aso, S. and Isao, S. 1963 Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.9, 85–90.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhardwaj, K. K. R. and Gaur, A. C. 1970 Folia Microbiol.15, 364–367.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chand, M.et al. 1980 Plant and Soil55, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dixit, V. K. and Kishore, N. 1967 Indian J. Sci. Indust.1, 202–205.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haan, H., De, 1974 Freshwater Biol.4, 301–310.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kodama, H. and Schnitzer, M. 1977. Geoderma19, 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, Y. S. and Bartlett, R. J. 1976 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.40, 876–879.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lineham, D. J. 1976. Soil Biol. Biochem.8, 511–517.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lineham, D. J. 1978 Plant and Soil50, 663–670.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mylonas, V. A. and McCants, C. B. 1980 J. Plant Nutr.2, 377–393.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pauli, F. W. 1961. Sci. Progr.XLIX 427–439.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poapst, P. A.et al. 1970 Plant and Soil32, 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poapst, P. A. and Schnitzer, M. 1971 Soil Biol. Biochem.3, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prat, S. and Pospisil, F. 1959. Biol. Plant. Praha1, 71–80.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schnitzer, M. and Poapst, P. A. 1967 Nature London213, 598–599.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schnitzer, M. and Skinner, S. I. M. 1968 Soil Sci.105, 392–396.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh, S. P.et al. 1980. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci.28, 141–147.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sladky, Z. 1959 Biol. Plant. Praha1, 142–150.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smidova, M. 1960 Biol. Plant. Praha2, 152–164.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960 Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tan, K. H. and Nopamornbodi, V. 1979 Plant and Soil51, 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tan, K. H. and Napamornbodi, V. 1979 Soil Biol. Biochem.11, 651–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vaughan, D. 1969 Soil Biol. Biochem.1, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vaughan, D. and MacDonald, I. R. 1971 J. Exp. Bot.22, 400–410.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vaughan, D.et al. J. Exp. Bot.29, 1337–1344.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. S. Rauthan
    • 1
  • M. Schnitzer
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemistry and Biology Research InstituteAgriculture CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations