Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen

, Volume 49, Issue 1–4, pp 313–328

Benthic community structures in the North Sea

  • C. Heip
  • J. A. Craeymeersch
North Sea Ecology: Biodiversity, Biogeography

Abstract

Coherent assemblages of marine benthic species have been recognized from the early twentieth century, and the classical papers of Petersen (1914, 1918) were based on studies of limited areas in the North Sea. In 1986, a synoptic survey of the North Sea north to 57°N was undertaken by a group of ten laboratories from seven North Sea countries. The results of this survey have recently been published (Heip et al., 1992a, b; Künitzer et al., 1992; Huys et al., 1992), and some of the results are summarized in this paper. The analysis of the macrofauna is based on slightly more than 700 taxa. In general, the North Sea macrofauna consists of northern species extending south to the northern margins of the Dogger Bank, and southern species extending north to the 100 m depth line. The central North Sea is an area of overlap of southern and northern species, especially around the 70 m depth contour. Consistent groupings of species are recognized that were summarized in seven faunal groupings. Macrofaunal body weight, density and diversity increase linearly towards the north. Macrofaunal biomass for the whole area averages 7 g adwt. m−2 and decreases from south to north. Distribution patterns and trends within the meiofauna were very different. Nematodes, which are the dominant taxon overall, are least abundant in the sandy sediments of the Southern Bight, then increase to a maximum around 53° 30′ N and slowly decrease again towards the north. Copepod density and diversity are highest in the Southern Bight, due to the presence of many interstitial species. A large number of species new to science were recorded by the North Sea Benthos Survey and about 1500 species are expected to occur. Copepods show very distinct assemblages according to water depth and sediment type. The contrasting patterns in latitudinal gradients of body weight and number of species of macro- and meiofauna can be only partially explained. Latitude and sediment characteristics, such as grain size and content in plant pigments, and water depth, determine part of the variance in species composition, density and biomass of the benthic fauna, but the patterns that are observed are different for different benthic groups, requiring careful consideration as to their use in biological monitoring procedures. Distributions are related to current patterns in the North Sea, annual temperature variations and availability of food. However, large parts of the variance in many parameters remain unexplained.

Literature Cited

  1. Andersen, K. P. & Ursin, E., 1977. A multispecies extension to the Beverton and Holt theory of fishing, with accounts of phosphorus circulation and primary production. — Meddr Danm. Fisk.-og Havunders.7, 319–435.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous, 1986. Fifth report of the Benthos Ecology Working Group. — C. M./ICES,L 27, 1–33.Google Scholar
  3. Basford, D. J. & Eleftheriou, A., 1988. The benthic environment of the North Sea (56° to 61°N). — J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.68, 125–141.Google Scholar
  4. Basford, D. J., Eleftheriou, A. & Raffaelli, D., 1989. The epifauna of the northern North Sea (56°–61°N). — J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K.69, 387–407.Google Scholar
  5. Basford, D. J., Eleftheriou, A. & Raffaelli, D., 1990. The infauna and epifauna of the northern North Sea. — Neth. J. Sea Res.25, 166–173.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, A., 1992. Is there a latitudinal diversity cline in the sea? — Trends Ecol. Evolut.7, 286–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eleftheriou, A. & Basford, D. J., 1989. The macrobenthic infauna of the offshore northern North Sea. — J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.69, 123–143.Google Scholar
  8. Fransz, H. G. & Gieskes, W. N. C., 1984. The imbalance of phytoplankton and copepods in the North Sea. — Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer183, 218–225.Google Scholar
  9. Heip, C., Basford, D., Craeymeersch, J. A., Dewarumez, J.-M., Dörjes, J., de Wilde, P., Duineveld, G., Eleftheriou, A., Herman, P. M. J., Niermann, U., Kingston, P., Künitzer, A., Rachor, E., Rumohr, H., Soetaert, K. & Soltwedel, T., 1992a. Trends in biomass, density and diversity of North Sea macrofauna. — ICES J. mar. Sci.,49, 13–22.Google Scholar
  10. Heip, C., Basford, D., Craeymeersch, J. A., Dewarumez, J.-M., de Wilde, P., Dörjes, J., Duineveld, G., Eleftheriou, A., Herman, P. M. J., Huys, R., Irion, G., Niermann, U., Kingston, P., Künitzer, A., Rachor, E., Rumohr, H., Soetaert, K. & Soltwedel, T., 1992b. The benthic communities of the North Sea. Summary of the results of the North Sea Benthos Survey as presented to the advisory Committee on Marine Pollution of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. ICES Coop. Res. Rep.190, 148–175.Google Scholar
  11. Hill, M. O., 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. — Ecology54, 427–432.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, M. O., 1979. TWINSPAN—a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Cornell Univ., New York, 90 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Huys, R., Herman, P. M. J., Heip, C. H. R. & Soetaert, K., 1992. The meiobenthos of the North Sea: density, biomass trends and distribution of copepod communities. — ICES J. mar. Sci.49, 23–44.Google Scholar
  14. Huys, R., 1992. The amphiatlantic distribution ofLeptastacus macronyx (T. Scolt, 1892) (Copepoda Harpacticoida). — Meded. K. Acad. Wet. Lett.sch one Kunsten Belg. Kl. Wet.54, 21–196.Google Scholar
  15. Kirkegaard, J. B., 1969. A quantitative investigation of the central North Sea polychaeta. — Spolia zool. Mus. haun.29, 1–185.Google Scholar
  16. Krause, M., 1981. Vertical distribution of faecal pellets during FLEX '76. — Helgoländer Meeresunters.34, 313–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Künitzer, A., Basford, D., Craeymeersch, J. A., Dewarumez, J. M., Dörjes, Duineveld, G. C. A. J., Eleftheriou, A., Heip, C., Herman, P. M. J., Kingston, P., Niermann, U., Rumohr, H. & de Wilde, P. A. J., 1992. The benthic infauna of the North Sea: Species distribution and assemblages. — ICES J. mar. Sci.49, 127–143.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, A. J., 1980. North Sea: physical oceanography. In: The north-west European shelf seas. Ed. by F. T. Banner, M. B. Collins, K. S. Massie. Elsevier, Amsterdam,2, 467–493.Google Scholar
  19. Petersen, C. G. J., 1914. Valuation of the sea. II. The animal communities of the sea bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. — Rep. Dan. Biol. Stn.21, 1–44.Google Scholar
  20. Petersen, C. G. J., 1918. The sea bottom and its production of fishfood. — Rep. Dan. biol. Stn25, 1–62.Google Scholar
  21. Petersen, G. H., 1977. The density, biomass and origin of the bivalves of the central North Sea. — Meddr Danm. Fisk.- og Havunders.7, 221–273.Google Scholar
  22. Rachor, E., 1982. Biomass distribution and production estimates of macro-endofauna in the North Sea. — ICES CM 1982/L:2, 11 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Steele, J. H., 1967. Notes on some theoretical problems in production ecology. — Memorie Ist. ital. Idrobiol.18 (Suppl.), 383–398.Google Scholar
  24. Steele, J. H., 1974. The structure of marine ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford, 128 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Stehli, F. G., McAlester, A. L. & Helsley, C. E., 1967. Taxonomic diversity of recent bivalves and some implications for geology. — Bull. geol. Soc. Am.,78, 455–466.Google Scholar
  26. Tomczak, G. & Goedecke E., 1962. Monatskarten der Temperatur der Nordsee, dargestellt für verschiedene Tiefenhorizonte. — Dt. hydrog. Z. Erg.-H. (Reihe B)7.Google Scholar
  27. Thorson, G., 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). In: Treatise on marine ecology and palaeoecology. Ed. by J. W. Hedgpeth. Geol. Soc. of America, New York, 461–534.Google Scholar
  28. Ursin, E., 1960. A quantitative investigation of the echinoderm fauna of the central North Sea. — Meddr. Danm. Fisk.- og Havunders.2, 1–204.Google Scholar
  29. Wells, J. B. J., 1986. Copepoda: marine-interstitial Harpacticoida. In: Stygofauna mundi. Ed. by L. Botosaneanu. Brill, Leiden, 356–381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biologische Anstalt Helgiland 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Heip
    • 1
  • J. A. Craeymeersch
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Estuarine and Coastal EcologyNetherlands Institute of EcologyYersekeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations