Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 413–422

A method for pneumatically inserting an array of penetrating electrodes into cortical tissue

  • Patrick J. Rousche
  • Richard A. Normann
Article

Abstract

The goal of this research was to find a practical means by which an array of 100 needle-shaped electrodes could be implanted into the cerebral cortex with minimal brain tissue trauma. It was found that insertion of these structures into cortical tissues could only be performed using high insertion speeds. A pneumatically actuated impact insertion system has been developed that is capable of inserting an electrode array into feline brain tissue at speeds from about 1 to 11 m/s. We found that a minimum array insertion speed of 8.3 m/s was necessary for a complete, safe insertion of all 100 electrodes in the array to a depth of 1.5 mm into feline cortex. The performance of the impact insertion system is discussed in terms of a simplified representation of cortical tissue.

Keywords

Penetrating electrode array Impact insertion Cortical neurophysiology Neuroprosthetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brindley, G.S.; Lewin, W.S. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. J. Physiol. 196:479–493; 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell, P.K.; Jones, K.E.; Huber, R.J.; Horch, K.A.; Normann, R.A. A silicon-based three dimensional-neural interface: Manufacturing processes for an intracortical electrode array. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38(8):758–768; 1991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cha, K. Simulation of a phosphene-based visual field: Visual acuity in a pixelized vision system. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 20:439–449; 1992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Edell, D.J.; McNeil, V.M.; Clark, L.D. Microfabrication technology for development of chronic neural information transducers. Proc. Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE-Int. Elect. Dev. Meet.; 1986: pp. 180–183.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fung, Y.C. Biomechanics — Mechanical properties of living tissues. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1981.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hibdon, D.T. High frequency motion to reduce catheter insertion resistance. Salt Lake City: Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah; 1988. Master's Thesis.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hubel, D.H. Eye, brain and vision. Scientific American library. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1988: pp. 93–125.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones, K.E.; Campbell, P.K.; Normann, R.A. A glass/silicon composite intracortical electrode array. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 20:423–437; 1992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koeneman, J.B. Viscoelastic properties of brain tissue. Case Institute of Technology, Cleveland, OH; 1966. Master's Thesis.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Normann, R.A. A penetrating cortical electrode array design considerations. Proc. Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE-Systems, Man and Cybern.; 1990: pp. 921–923.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ommaya, A.K. Mechanical properties of tissues of the nervous system. J. Biomech. 1:127–138; 1968.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ranck, J.B. Electrical stimulation research techniques. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1981: pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rousche, P.J.; Normann, R.A. A system for impact insertion of a 100 electrode array into cortical tissue. Proc. Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med Biol. Soc.; 1990: 12:494–495.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wise, K.D.; Angell, J.B. A low-capacitance multielectrode probe for use in extracellular neurophysiology. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-22(3):212–219; 1975.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wuerker, R.B.; Palay, S.L. Neurofilaments and microtubules in anterior horn cells of the rat. Tissue and Cell. 1:387–402; 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pergamon Press Ltd. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick J. Rousche
    • 1
  • Richard A. Normann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations