Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen

, Volume 42, Issue 3–4, pp 493–509 | Cite as

Morphogenesis and generic concepts in coralline algae — a reappraisal

  • J. Cabioch


In coralline algae, anatomy has long been used for generic definition, in addition to reproductive structures. Coralline anatomy is here analysed according to its two main components: cell behaviour and morphogenesis. The meristems and thir function are explained and the main types of organization are examined in an evolutionary context. Emphasis is given to ontogenetical data such as the occurrence of metamorphosis and progressive development in some species of theLithophyllum complex, which have raised difficulties for generic definitions in the past. Consequently, a certain number of terms (epithallus, hypothallus, perithallus) are clarified and some of them restricted in relation to their morphogenetic significance. As a consequence of this clarification, evolutionary groups are defined and within them parallel phylogenetic lines appear as continuums along which genera are morphogenetic steps.

Literature Cited

  1. Adey, W. H., 1964. The genusPhymatolithon in the Gulf of Maine. — Hydrobiologia24, 377–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adey, W. H., 1965. The genusClathromorphum (Corallinaceae) in the Gulf of Maine. —Hydrobiologia26, 539–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adey, W. H., 1966. The genusPseudolithophyllum (Corallinaceae) in the Gulf of Maine. —Hydrobiologia27, 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Afonso-Carrilo, J., 1982. Sobre el modo de formacion de los conceptaculos asexuales enPorolithon Foslie (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta). — Investigacion pesq.46, 255–262.Google Scholar
  5. Areschoug, J. E., 1852. Ordo XII. Corallineae. In: Species, genera et ordines algarum. Ed. by J. Agardh. Gleerup, Lund,2, 506–576.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, A. & Bisalputra, T., 1970. A preliminary account of the application of thin-sectioning, freezeetching and scanning microscopy to the study of coralline algae. — Phycologia9, 83–101.Google Scholar
  7. Borowitzka, M. A., 1977. Algal calcification. — Oceanogr. mar. Biol.15, 189–223.Google Scholar
  8. Borowitzka, M. A., 1982a. Morphological and cytological aspects of algal calcification. — Int. Rev. Cytol.74, 127–162.Google Scholar
  9. Borowitzka, M. A., 1982b. Mechanisms in algal calcification. — Prog. phycol. Res.1, 137–177.Google Scholar
  10. Borowitzka, M. A., Larkum, A. W. D. & Nockolds, C. E., 1974. A scanning electron microscope study of the structure and organization of the calcium carbonate deposits of algae. — Phycologia13, 195–203.Google Scholar
  11. Bressan, G., Miniati-Radin, D. & Smundin, L., 1977. Ricerche sul genereFosliella (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta):Fosliella cruciata sp. nov. — G. Bot. ital.111, 27–44.Google Scholar
  12. Cabioch, J., 1966. Sur le mode de formation du thalle articulé chez quelques Corallinées. — C. r. Acad. Sci., Paris (D)263, 339–342.Google Scholar
  13. Cabioch, J., 1968. Sur quelques problèmes de la morphogenèse des Corallinacées. — Mém. Soc. bot. Fr.115, 110–119.Google Scholar
  14. Cabioch, J., 1969a. Sur le mode de développement de quelquesAmphiroa (Rhodophycées, Corallinacées). — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris (D)269, 2338–2340.Google Scholar
  15. Cabioch, J., 1969b. Persistance de stades juvéniles et possibilité d'une néoténie chez leLithophyllum incrustans Philippi. — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, (D)268, 497–500.Google Scholar
  16. Cabioch, J., 1970. Sur l'importance des phénomènes cytologiques pour la systématique et la phylogénie des Corallinacées (Rhodophycées, Cryptonémiales). — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris (D)271, 296–299.Google Scholar
  17. Cabioch, J., 1971. Essai d'une nouvelle classification des Corallinacées actuelles. — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris (D)272, 1916–1919.Google Scholar
  18. Cabioch, J., 1972. Etude sur les Corallinacées. II. La morphogenèse, conséquences systématiques et phylogénétiques. — Cah. Biol. mar.13, 137–287.Google Scholar
  19. Cabioch, J. & Giraud, G., 1974. Remarques sur l'ultrastructure des thalles de certaines Corallinacées. — J. Microscopie20, 33a.Google Scholar
  20. Cabioch, J. & Giraud, G., 1978a. Comportement cellulaire au cours de la régénération directe chez leMesophyllum lichenoides (Ellis), Lemoine (Rhodophycées, Corallinacées). — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris (D)286, 1783–1785.Google Scholar
  21. Cabioch, J. & Giraud, G., 1978b. Apport de la microscopie électronique à la comparaison de quelques espèces deLithothamnium Philippi. — Phycologia17, 369–381.Google Scholar
  22. Cabioch, J. & Giraud, G., 1986. Structural aspects of biomineralization in the coralline algae (calcified Rhodophyceae). In: Biomineralization in lower plants and animals. Ed. by B.S.C. Leadbeater & R. Reading. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 141–156.Google Scholar
  23. Chamberlain, Y. M., 1983. Studies in the Corallinaceae with special reference toFosliella andPneophyllum in the British Isles. — Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Bot.)11 (4), 291–463.Google Scholar
  24. Chihara, M., 1974. The significance of reproductive and spore germination characteristics to the systematics of the Corallinaceae: nonarticulated coralline algae. — J. Phycol.10, 266–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dawson, E. Y., 1963. New records of marine algae from the Galapagos Islands. — Pacif. Nat.4, (1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  26. Fritsch, F. E., 1945. The structure and reproduction of the algae. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge,2, 1–939.Google Scholar
  27. Giraud, G. & Cabioch, J., 1976a. Aspects ultrastructuraux de la calcification chez les Corallinacées (Rhodophycées). — J. Microscopie26, 14a.Google Scholar
  28. Giraud, G. & Cabioch, J., 1976b. Etude ultrastructurale de l'activité des cellules superficielles du thalle des Corallinacées (Rhodophycées). — Phycologia15 405–414.Google Scholar
  29. Giraud, G. & Cabioch, J., 1977. Caractères généraux de l'ultrastructure des Corallinacées. — Revue algol.12, 45–60.Google Scholar
  30. Giraud, G. & Cabioch, J., 1979. Ultrastructure and elaboration of calcified cell-walls in the coralline algae (Rhodophyta, Cryptonemiales). — Biol. cell.36, 81–86.Google Scholar
  31. Giraud, G. & Cabioch, J., 1981. Sur l'existence de cicatrisations cellulaires internes chez les Corallinacées (Rhodophycées, Cryptonémiales) et leur interprétation. — C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris (D)292, 1037–1041.Google Scholar
  32. Giraud, G. & Hauswirth, N., 1979. Utilisation des répliques pour l'analyse de la structure cristalline des parois de Corallinacées (Rhodophycées). — Biol. cell.35, 29.Google Scholar
  33. Hamel, G. & Lemoine, M., 1953. Corallinacées de France et d'Afrique du Nord. — Archs. Mus. natn Hist. nat., Paris (Ser. 7)1, 15–136.Google Scholar
  34. Johansen, H. W., 1969. Morphology and systematics of coralline algae with special reference toCalliarthron. — Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.49, 1–78.Google Scholar
  35. Johansen, H. W., 1976. Current status of generic concepts in coralline algae (Rhodophyta). —Phycologia15, 221–244.Google Scholar
  36. Johansen, H. W., 1981. Coralline algae: a first synthesis. C.R.C. Press, Boca Raton, 238 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Johansen, H. W. & Adey, W. H., 1965. Studies ofLithophyllum and related algal genera. — Colo. Sch. Mines Q.60, (2), 1–65.Google Scholar
  38. Kylin, J., 1956. Die Gattungen der Rhodophyceen. Gleerup, Lund, 673 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Lemoine, M., 1911. Structure anatomique des Mélobésiées. Application à la Classification. — Annls Inst. océanogr., Monaco2, 1–215.Google Scholar
  40. Lemoine, M., 1977. Les difficultés de la phylogénie chez les Algues Corallinacées. — Bull. Soc. géol. Fr.19, 1319–1325.Google Scholar
  41. Littler, M. M., 1976. Calcification and its role among the macroalgae. — Micronesica,12, 27–41.Google Scholar
  42. Masaki, M., 1968. Studies on the Melobesioideae of Japan. — Mem. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ.16, 1–80.Google Scholar
  43. Mendoza, M. L. & Cabioch, J., 1984. Redéfinition còmparée de deux espèces de Corallinacées d'Argentine:Pseudolithophyllum fuegianum (Heydrich) comb. nov. etHydrolithon discoideum (Foslie). comb. nov. — Cryptogamie (Algol.)5 (4) 141–154.Google Scholar
  44. Mendoza, M. L. & Cabioch, J., 1985. Critique et comparaison morphogénétique des genresClathromorphum etAntarcticophyllum (Rhodophyta, Corallinaceae). Conséquences biogéographiques et systématiques. — Cah. Biol. mar.26, 251–266.Google Scholar
  45. Mendoza, M. L. & Cabioch, J., 1986. Le genreHydrolithon (Rhodophyta, Corallinaceae) sur les côtes subantarctiques et antarctiques d'Argentine et de quelques régions voisines. — Cah. Biol. mar.27, 163–191.Google Scholar
  46. Morse, A. N. C. & Morse, D. E., 1984. Recruitment and metamorphosis ofHaliotis larvae induced by molecules uniquely available at the surfaces of crustose red algae. — J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol.,75, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Okazaki, M., Tsukayama, K. & Nisizawa, K., 1982. Isolation and identification of alginic acid from a calcareous red algaSerraticardia maxima. — Botanica mar.25, 123–131.Google Scholar
  48. Okazaki, M., Shiroto, M. & Furuya, K., 1984. Relationship between the location of polyuronides and calcification sites in the calcareous red algaeSerraticardia maxima andLithothamnion japonica (Rhodophyta, Corallinaceae). — Jap. J. Phycol.32, 364–372.Google Scholar
  49. Oltmanns, F., 1904. Morphologie und Biologie der Algen. Fischer, Jena,1, 1–733.Google Scholar
  50. Penrose, D. & Woelkerling, W. J., 1988. A taxonomic reassessment ofHydrolithon Foslie andPseudolithophyllum Lemoine emend. Adey (Corallinaeae, Rhodophyta) and their relationships toSpongites Kützing. — Phycologia27, 159–176.Google Scholar
  51. Pentecost, A., 1980. Calcification in plants. — Int. Rev. Cytol.62, 1–27.Google Scholar
  52. Pueschel, C. M. & Cole, K. M., 1982. Rhodophycean pit plugs: an ultrastructural survey with taxonomic implications. — Am. J. Bot.69, 703–720.Google Scholar
  53. Sauvageau, C., 1909. Sur le développement échelonné de l'Halopteris (Stypocaulon Kutz.)scoparia Sauv. et remarques sur leSphacelaria radicans Harv. — J. Bot., Paris (Ser. 2)2, 44–71.Google Scholar
  54. Silva, P. C. & Johansen, H. W., 1986. A reappraisal of the order Corallinales (Rhodophycaeae). — Br. phycol. J.21, 245–254.Google Scholar
  55. Srimanobhas, V. S. & Masaki, T., 1987.Amphiroa itonoi (Corallinales, Rhodophyta), a new species of marine algae from Japan. — Jap. J. Phycol.35, 1–9.Google Scholar
  56. Suneson, S., 1937. Studien über die Entwicklungsgeschichte der Corallinaceen. — Lunds Univ. Arsskr. N. F. (Avd. 2)33, 1–102.Google Scholar
  57. Suneson, S., 1943. The structure, live-history and taxonomy of the Swedish Corallinaceae. — Lunds Univ. Arsskr. N.F. (Avd. 2)39, 1–66.Google Scholar
  58. Suneson, S., 1945. On the anatomy, cytology and reproduction ofMastophora. — Kgl. Fysiogr. Säls Lund Förhandl.15, 251–264.Google Scholar
  59. Weber van Bosse, A. & Foslie, M., 1904. The Corallinaceae of the Siboga-Expedition. — Siboga-Exp.61, 78–110.Google Scholar
  60. Woelkerling, W. J., 1980. Studies onMetamastophora (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta). I.M. flabellata (Sonder) Setchell: Morphology and anatomy. — Br. phycol. J.15, 201–225.Google Scholar
  61. Woelkerling, W. J., 1984. Foslie and Corallinaeceae: an analysis and indexes. — Biblthca phycol. 69, 1–142.Google Scholar
  62. Woelkerling, W. J., 1985. A taxonomic reassessment ofSpongites (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta) based on studies of Kützing's original collections. — Br. phycol. J.20, 123–153.Google Scholar
  63. Woelkerling, W. J., Chamberlain, Y. M. & Silva, P. C., 1985. A taxonomic and nomenclatural reassessment ofTenarea, Titanoderma andDermatolithon (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta) based on studies of type and other critical specimens. — Phycologia24, 317–337.Google Scholar
  64. Woelkerling, W. J. & Irvine, L. M., 1986a. The typification and status ofPhymatolithon (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta). — Br. phycol. J.21, 55–80.Google Scholar
  65. Woelkerling, W. J. & Irvine, L. M., 1986b. The neotypification and status ofMesophyllum (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta). — Phycologia25, 379–386.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biologische Anstalt Helgoland 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Cabioch
    • 1
  1. 1.Station BiologiqueRoscoffFrance

Personalised recommendations