Advertisement

Potato Research

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 121–127 | Cite as

Symptoms induced by Andean potato latent virus in wild and cultivated potatoes

  • R. A. C. Jones
  • C. E. Fribourg
Short Communication

Summary

The symptomatology of Andean potato latent virus (APLV) was studied in several wild potato species and potato cultivars using isolates Caj, Hu and Ay from Peru. In greenhouse tests, the virus was latent in most isolate/cultivar combinations with primary infection but secondary infection commonly caused symptoms. Wild species infected with the different isolates normally reacted with symptoms with either type of infection. The main symptoms were mosaics, chlorotic netting of minor leaf veins and, with wild species, leaf deformation; the netting symptom was typical only with Caj. In infected cultivars growing in the field, an additional symptom, rugosity, sometimes also developed and environmental conditions at high altitude seemed to enhance symptom formation. Very severe symptoms were found in a cultivar jointly infected with APLV and Andean potato mottle virus. Transmission of APLV from an infected plant to its tubers was erratic.

Additional keyword

Symptomatology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, E. M., 1961. Serological tests for the identification of plant viruses. The American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul. Minnesota, USA, 16 p.Google Scholar
  2. Fribourg, C. E., 1977. Andean potato calico strain of tobacco ringspot virus.Phytopathology 67: 174–178.Google Scholar
  3. Fribourg, C. E., 1978. Antiserum production and present status of tests for viruses in the International Potato Centre seed program. Planning Conference on Developments in the control of potato viruses. International Potato Centre, Lima, Peru. (In press.)Google Scholar
  4. Fribourg, C. E., R. A. C. Jones & R. Koenig, 1977a. Host plant reactions, physical properties and serology of three isolates of Andean potato latent virus from Peru.Ann. appl. Biol. 86: 373–380.Google Scholar
  5. Fribourg, C. E., R. A. C. Jones & R. Koenig, 1977b. Andean potato mottle, a new member of the cowpea mosaic virus group.Phytopathology 67: 969–974.Google Scholar
  6. Gibbs, A. J., E. Hecht-Poinar, R. D. Woods & R. K. McKee, 1966. Some properties of three related viruses: Andean potato latent. Dulcamara mottle and Ononis yellow mosaic.J. gen. Microbiol. 44: 177–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones, R. A. C. & C. E. Fribourg, 1977. Beetle, contact and potato true seed transmission of Andean potato latent virus.Ann. appl. Biol. 86: 123–128.Google Scholar
  8. Salazar, L. F. & R. A. C. Jones, 1975. Some studies on the distribution and incidence of potato mop-top virus in Peru.Am. Potato J. 52: 143–150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. C. Jones
    • 1
  • C. E. Fribourg
    • 2
  1. 1.International Potato CentreLimaPeru
  2. 2.Departamento de Sanidad VegetalUniversidad Nacional AgrariaLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations