Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 507–515 | Cite as

Piracetam-induced changes in the functional activity of neurons as a possible mechanism for the effects of nootropic agents

  • Ya. I. Verbnyi
  • L. P. Derzhiruk
  • A. Ya. Mogilevskii
Article

Abstract

Studies were carried out on the effects of piracetam (4–20 mM) on the electrical activity of identified neurons in the isolated central nervous system of the pond snail in conditions of single-electrode intracellular stimulation and recording. Piracetam-induced changes were seen in 60–70% of the neurons studied. Different parameters showed different sensitivities to piracetam: the most frequent changes were in the action potential generation threshold, the slope and shape of the steady-state voltage-current characteristics of neuron membranes, and the appearance of piracetam-induced transmembrane ion currents. Nifedipine and cadmium ions, both of which are calcium channel blockers, generally reversed or weakened the effects of piracetam on the changes seen in test cells. This indicates that the effects of piracetam result from its action on calcium channels; selective changes in calcium channels may determine which piracetam-induced effects appear at the cellular level. It is hypothesized that the piracetam-sensitive cellular plasticity mechanisms may make a significant contribution to its nootropic action at the behavioral level.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. Abramets, P. V. Andreev, I. V. Komissarov, et al., “Nootropes potentiate the responses of nerve cells due to activation of NMDA-glutamate receptors,” Byull. Éksp. Biol. Med.,115, No. 1, 51 (1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu. G. Bobkov, P. V. Polev, A. I. Machula, et al., “The involvement of dehydropyridine-sensitive calcium channels in the psychotropic effect of nootropic agents,” Byull. Éksp. Biol. Med.,110, No. 10, 386 (1990).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ya. I. Verbnyi and A. Ya. Mogilevskii, ‘Studies of a cellular analog of “instrumental behavior” on individual mollusk neurons in conditions of automatic intracellular electrical stimulation,’ Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,38, No. 3, 489 (1988).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ya. I. Verbnyi and A. Ya. Mogilevskii, “Possible mechanisms for the plastic rearrangement of neuronal activity in different regimes of intracellular electrical stimulation as assessed by system analysis,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,43, No. 1, 3 (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. N. Verkhratskii, “Molecular mechanisms for the regulation of the functional activity of calcium channels in cardiac muscle’, Usp. Fiziol. Nauk.,23, No. 1, 3 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. A. Voronina, “Experimental psychopharmacology of nootropes,” in: The Pharmacology of Nootropes [in Russian], Biol. Nauki, Moscow (1989), p. 8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. A. Voronina, “Current problems in the pharmacology of nootropes: the current position and perspectives,” Farmakol. Toksikol.,54, No. 2, 6 (1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. N. Grechenko and L. K. Khludova, “The effect of the functional state of the neuron on learning,” Psikhol. Zh.,12, No. 5, 134 (1991).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. V. Doreuli, A. N. Chepkova, and V. G. Skrebitskii, Studies of the Effects of Nootropic Agents on Brain Neuronal Activity [in Russian], Handbook of Scientific Studies of the Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR (1990), No. 2, p. 62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. L. D'yakonova, “What and how does the neuron learn?,” Zh. Obshch. Biol.,48, No. 4, 311 (1987).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. L. D'yakonova and B. N. Veprintsev, Features of the Structural and Functional Organization and Metabolic Activity of Pond Snail Neurons [in Russian], Pushchino (1969). Deposited in the VINITI, No. 819 (1969).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. I. Kotlyar, The Neurobiological Basis of Learning [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1989).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Ya. Mogilevskii, V. M. Vinetskii, V. M. Kutovoi, et al., “A programmable apparatus based on a personal computer for single-electrode clamping of membrane potential of excitable cells,” Fiziol. Zh.,80, No. 3, 129 (1994).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. U. Ostrovskaya and T. A. Gudasheva, “The activity of nootropes in terms of acute quenching of orientational responses,” Byull. Éksp. Biol. Med.,111, No. 5, 498 (1991).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. S. Pivovarov and B. I. Kotlyar, “Calcium regulation of transient plasticity in neuron cholinoreceptors in PPa3 and LPa3 of the grape snail,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,40, No. 1, 135 (1990).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. L. Pragina, T. A. Voronina, A. N. Inozemtsev, et al., “The effect of piracetam and nicergoline on conditioned reflex memory in extreme conditions,” Farmakol. Toksikol.,53, No. 3, 8 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. A. Saakyan, I. G. Kuznetsov, M. M. Rasulov, et al., ‘Neurophysiological analysis of the action of piracetam on rabbit hippocampal neurons,’ Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,75, No. 9, 1204 (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. N. Sokolov, Neuronal Mechanisms of Memory and Learning [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1981).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. A. Tushmalova, V. G. Bezlenkin, F. F. Kokaeva, and A. I. Gaziev, “The effect of piracetam on unprogrammed DNA synthesis in the brain,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,320, No. 3, 7661 (1991).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. V. Yasnetsov, V. A. Pravdivtsev, and I. N. Krylova, “The effect of oxiracetam and piracetam on the electrical activity of cortical neurons,” Byull. Éksp. Biol. Med.,110, No. 10, 381 (1990).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Kaneko, H. Takahashi, M. Sugimura, and M. Satoh, “Effects of nootropic drugs on excitatory amino acid receptor-mediated responses in Xenopus oocytes by guinea pig forebrain mRNA,” Neurosci. Res., Suppl., p. 103 (1990).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. R. Martin, R. Cumin, W. Aschwanden, et al., “Aniracetam improves radial maze performance in rats,” Neuroreport.,3 81 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. D. Petkov, S. Belcheva, and V. Stoyanova, “Effects of nootropic agents on the performing of active two-way avoidance tasks in young and old rats,” Acta Physiol. Pharmacol. Bulg.,16, 35 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    U. Staubii, M. Kessler, and G. Lynch, “Aniracetam has proportionately smaller effects on synapses expressing long-term potentiation: evidence that receptor changes subserve LTP,” J. Psychobiol.,18, 377 (1990).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Velisek, G. Keller, P. Mares, and J. Schmidt, “The effects of nootropic drugs on the hippocampal afterdischarges in the rat,” Activ. Nerv. Super.,32, 213 (1990).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Yoshii and S. Watanabe, “Enhancement of neuronal calcium channel by the neurotropic agent, nefiracetam (DM-9384), in the NG-108-15 cells,” Brain Res.,642, 123 (1994).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publshing corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ya. I. Verbnyi
  • L. P. Derzhiruk
  • A. Ya. Mogilevskii

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations