Potato Research

, Volume 42, Issue 3–4, pp 611–617 | Cite as

Some sprouting characteristics of microtubers

  • K. M. Tábori
  • J. Dobránszki
  • A. Ferenczy
Full Papers

Summary

Microtubers can be stored longer, transported and handled easier than plantlets, but they have some disadvantages related to long dormancy. Dormancy, number of sprouts per tuber and loss of microtubers under different storage temperatures were studied. Microtubers of four genotypes originated from different tuberization treatments (photoperiod combinations) were observed. We found that dormancy depended on cultivar and — in some cases — on the photoperiod treatment applied during tuberization. Generally, the dormacy was long and was greatly elongated by low storage temperature. One of the photoperiod treatments shortened while the other treatment prolonged the rest-period compared to the control, maybe due to a change in temperature accompanying the change in daily light (photoperiod combination). Besides, these treatments affected the number of sprouts per tuber. There was no significant difference in duration of dormancy between different tuber-size groups, but the loss increased significanctly with a decrease in tuber size. Based on this information we can use microtubers more effectively in the seed potato production programme.

Additional keywords

dormancy potato losses Solanum tuberosum L. seed potato production 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bottini, G.A., R. Bottini & R. Tizio, 1982. Physiology of dormancy in potato tubers as related to levels of endogenous regulators.Phyton 42 (1): 115–121.Google Scholar
  2. Copeland, R.B., 1990. Yield and disease in progeny of field-grown mini- and microtubers. Proceedings 11th Triennial Conference EAPR Edinburgh, pp. 450–451.Google Scholar
  3. Dobránszki, J., 1996. Effects of dark treatment on tuber initiation and development of induced potato plantets cultured in vitro.Acta Agronomica Hungarica 44 (4): 377–386.Google Scholar
  4. Garner, N. & J. Blacke, 1989. The induction and development of potato microtubers in vitro on media free of growth regulating substances.Annals of Botany 63: 663–674.Google Scholar
  5. Ittersum, M.K. van, 1992. Variation in the duration of tuber dormancy within a seed potato lot.Potato Research 35: 261–269.Google Scholar
  6. Kumar, G.N.M. & R. Knowles, 1993. Involvement of auxin in the loss of apical dominance and plant growth potential accompanying aging of potato seed tubers.Canadian Journal of Botany 71: 541–550.Google Scholar
  7. Leclerc, Y., D.J. Donnelly, W.K. Coleman & R.R. King, 1995. Microtuber dormancy in three potato cultivars.American Potato Journal 72: 215–223.Google Scholar
  8. Lommen, W.J.M., 1993. Post harvest characteristics of potato minitubers with different fresh weights and from different harvests. II. Losses during storage.Potato Research 36: 273–282.Google Scholar
  9. Lommen, W.J.M. & P.C. Struik, 1990. Dormancy and vigour of minitubers after storage periods of different length. Abstract of Conference Papers 11th Triennial Conference EAPR, Edinburgh, pp. 448–449.Google Scholar
  10. Ortiz-Montiel, G. & H. Lozoya-Saldana, 1987. Potato minitubers: technology validation in Mexico.American Potato Journal 64: 535–544.Google Scholar
  11. Ranalli, P., M. Bizarri, L. Borghi & M. Mari, 1994. Genotypic influence on in vitro induction dormancy length, advancing age and agronomical performance of potato microtubers (Solanum tuberosum L.).Annals of Applied Biology 125: 161–172.Google Scholar
  12. Rosell, G., F.G. De Bertoldi & R. Tizio, 1987. In vitro mass tuberisation as a contribution to potato micropropagation.Potato Research 30: 111–116.Google Scholar
  13. Struik, P.C. & W.J.M. Lommen, 1991. Production, storage and use of micro-and minitubers. Proceedings 11th Triennial Conference EAPR, Edinburgh, pp. 122–133.Google Scholar
  14. Suttle, J.C. & J.F. Hultsrand, 1994. Role of endogenous abscisic acid in potato microtuber dormancy.Plant Physiology 105: 891–896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tovar, P., R. Estrada, L. Schilde-Rentschler & J.H. Dodds, 1985. Induction and use of in vitro potato tubers.CIP Circular 13: 1–5.Google Scholar
  16. Wiersema, S.G., R. Cabello, P. Tovar & J.H. Dodds, 1987. Rapid seed multiplication by planting into beds microtubers and in vitro plants.Potato Research 30: 117–120.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. M. Tábori
    • 1
  • J. Dobránszki
    • 1
  • A. Ferenczy
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Centre of Debrecen Agricultural UniversityNyíregyházaHungary
  2. 2.University of Horticulture and Food IndustryBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations