Research in Science Education

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 214–221 | Cite as

Action research through stimulated recall

  • John O'Brien


The emphasis in classroom learning research has moved from process-product models to the mediating process paradigm. The stimulated-recall interview and thik aloud techniques are the two main processes that have been used in attempts to find out what goes on inside students' heads while they are learning. For example, this researcher has used the stimulated-recall interview technique to identify the workplace thinking of a marine science researcher, and the in-class thinking of a year eleven biology student. Such studies as these have produced findings with important implications for the classroom teacher in the role of action researcher. This paper describes how to conduct stimulated-recall interviews and discusses some classroom implications from the two studies.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baird, J. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study.European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 263–282.Google Scholar
  2. Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated-recall: A method for research on teaching.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 211–217.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, C. & Peterson, P.L. (1976). Teacher stimulated-recall on interactive decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. Costa, A.L. (1991). Teaching for, of, and about thinking. In A. L. Costa (ed.).Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (Rev. ed., Volume 1). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  5. Costa, A.L. (1992). The school as a home for the mind. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Thinking, Townsville, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, J. (1991). The direct teaching of thinking skills. In G. Evans, (ed.)Learning and teaching cognitive skills. Melbourne: A.C.E.R.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, J. & Marland, P. (1982). Student thinking in a secondary biology classroom.Research in Science Education, 12, 211–217.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, J. & Marland, P. (1984a). A comparison of student thinking in a mathematics and a science classroom.Research in Science Education, 14, 29–38.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, J. & Marland, P. (1984b). What are students really thinking?Educational Leadership, 42(3), 63–67.Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, H. (1982).Art, mind and brain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Gardner, H. (1991).The unschooled mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Ghiselin, B. (Ed.) (1955).The creative process. New York: Mentor Books.Google Scholar
  13. Gunstone, R.F. & White, R.T. (1980). A matter of gravity.Research in Science Education, 10, 35–44.Google Scholar
  14. Hart, L. (1975).Human brain and human learning. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  15. Kagan, N., Krathwohl, D.R., Goldberg, A.D. & Campbell, R. (1967).Studies in human interaction: Interpersonal process recall stimulated by videotape, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
  16. Marland, P.W. (1984). Stimulated-recall from video: Its use in research on the thought processes of classroom participants. In O. Zuber-Skerrit, (ed.)Video in higher education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  17. Marland, P.W. & Edwards, J. (1986). Students' in-class thinking.Instructional Science, 15, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchell, J. & Marland, P.W. (1989). Research on teacher thinking: the next phase.Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(2), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morine, G. & Vallance, E. (1975).Beginning teacher evaluation study. Special study B: A study of teacher and pupil perceptions of classroom interaction. San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.Google Scholar
  20. Okamoto, M. (1992). The study of metacognition in solving arithmetic word problems.Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology.40(1), 81–88.Google Scholar
  21. Perkins, D. (1992).Smart schools-From training memories to educating minds. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Shayer, M. & Adey, P. (1990). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 267–285.Google Scholar
  23. Spradley, J.P. (1979).The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  24. Tobin, K. & Gallagher, J.J. (1987). What happens in high school science classrooms?Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 549–560.Google Scholar
  25. Winter, R. (1989).Learning from experience: Principles and practice in action-research. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Science Education Research Association 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • John O'Brien
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationJames Cook University of North QueenslandTownsville

Personalised recommendations