Skip to main content
Log in

How can we find out what 3 and 4 year olds think? New approaches to eliciting very young children's understandings in science

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper outlines work in progress on a study which is investigating what children understand about natural and processed materials and how scientific learning on the topic could be extended and reinforced in the home. Four different interview schedules for eliciting children's understanding were developed and tried out. Children's understandings prior to each of the four units, and at the conclusion of the teaching program were documented through individual interviews. Family interviews were also conducted prior to and at the conclusion to the teaching. In this paper the difficulties associated with researching young children's thinking are explored. The rationale for a storytelling context for the interviews is presented, and there is a preliminary discussion on the effectiveness of the methodology utilised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreani Dentrici, O., Grossi, M.G., Borghi, L., & De Ambrosis, A. (1984). Understanding floating: A study of children aged between six and eight years.European Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar, V. (1986). The development of the conception of evaporation. Jerusalem, Israel: The Herbrew University, The Amos de-Shalit Science Teaching Centre in Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar, V., & Travis, A.S. (1991). Children's views concerning phase changes.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4) 363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, F., & Osborne, R. (1984a).Making sense of our world: an interactive teaching approach. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Science Education Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddulph, F., & Osborne, R. (1984b). Pupils' ideas about floating and sinking.Research in Science Education, 14, 114–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, A., Driver., & Hind, D. (1989).Progression in science: The development of pupils' understanding of physical characteristics of air across the age range 5–16 years. Leeds, United Kingdom: University of Leeds, Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, M., & Osborne, R. (1980).Physical change. LISP Working Paper 26. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Science Education Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Corporation, (1992).SCTP News, No. 1 June, Newsletter, Victoria.

  • Donaldson, M. (1978).Children's minds. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987).Common knowledge. New York, Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1991).Early childhood science education: the teaching-learning process as scaffolding conceptual change Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Brisbane: University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., & Symington, D.J. (1988). Purposes achieved by drawing during science activities.Research in Science Education, 14, 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., & Symington, D.J. (1989). Techniques used by primary school pupils in drawings during science activities.Research in Science Education, 19, 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holding, B. (1987).Investigation of school children's understanding of the process of dissolving with special reference to the conservation of matter and the development of atomistic ideas. Unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Leeds.

  • Jones, B. (1984). How solid is a solid: Does it matter?Research in Science Education, 14, 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B.L., & Lynch, P.P. (1989). Children's understanding of the notions of solid and liquid in relation to some common substances.International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 417–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds National Curriculum Science Support Project (1992).Resources for supporting pupils' learning at Key Stage 3. Part 3 Materials and their properties. Leeds, United Kingdom: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, P. (1986). Context, conservation and conversation. In M. Richards, & P. Light (eds.)Children of social worlds. United Kingdom: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R., & Cosgrove, M. (1983). Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985).Learning in science. The implications of children's science. Auckland: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Carey, S., & Wiser, N. (1984). A case study of the development of size, weight and density.Cognition, 21(3), 177–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R. (1991). Children's ideas about matter.School Science and Mathematics, 91 (6), 240–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R., & Stachel, D. (1985). Children's ideas about ‘solid’ and ‘liquid’.European Journal of Science Education.7 (4), 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symington, D.J., & Hayes, D. (1987). Parental involvement in a science program.Research in Science Education, 17, 228–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1988).How children think and learn. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Specializations: early childhood science education; the Curriculum Corporation K-3 Science Program.

Specializations: primary science education, teacher education in science, adult experiences of science and technology; the K-3 Science Program.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleer, M., Hardy, T. How can we find out what 3 and 4 year olds think? New approaches to eliciting very young children's understandings in science. Research in Science Education 23, 68–76 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357046

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357046

Keywords

Navigation