Potato Research

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 215–219 | Cite as

The effect of short periods of shading at different stages of growth on the development of tuber number and yield

  • D. Gray
  • J. C. Holmes
Short Communications

Summary

Shading potato plants at the beginning of tuber initiation for a period of 12 days reduced the rate of tuber formation and growth; but after the shades were removed tuber formation continued to give more tubers and the shaded plants eventually produced 30% more tubers than the unshaded, with similar yield. Shading for 12 days during the early stages of rapid tuber bulking had no effect on tuber number or survival, though bulking rate was temporarily reduced, leading to a reduction in final yield. These number results indicate that tuber number can be influenced by the weather during the period of tuber initiation.

Keywords

Tuber Formation Potato Plant Final Yield Tuber Number Similar Yield 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bleasdale, J. K. A., 1965. Relationships between set characters and yield in maincrop potatoes.J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64:361–366.Google Scholar
  2. Bodlaender, K. B. A., 1963. Influence of temperature, radiation and photoperiod on development and yield. In: The growth of the potato,Proc. 10th Easter Sch. agric. Sci., Univ. Nott., Butterworth, London, p. 199–210.Google Scholar
  3. Bodlaender, K. B. A. & Algra, S., 1967. Influence of the growth retardant B995 on growth and yield of potatoes.Eur. Potato J. 9:242–258.Google Scholar
  4. Dyson, P. W., 1965. Effects of gibberellic acid and 2-chloroethyl: trimethyl-ammonium chloride on potato growth and development.J. Sci. Fd Agric. 16:542–549.Google Scholar
  5. Dyson, P. W. & Humphries, E. C., 1966. Modification of growth habit of Majestic potatoes by growth regulators applied at different times.Am. appl. Biol. 58:171–182.Google Scholar
  6. Epstein, E., 1966. Effects of soil temperature at different growth stages on growth and development of potato plants.Agron. J. 58:169–171.Google Scholar
  7. Llewellyn, J. C., 1967. The influence of water regimes on the growth and development of the potato crop. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Nottingham.Google Scholar
  8. Milthorpe, F. L. & Moorby, J., 1967. The growth of the potato.Proc. 3rd. Trienn. Conf. Eur. Ass. Potato Res., pp. 51–65Google Scholar
  9. Pohjahkallio, O., Salonen, A. & Antila, S., 1957. Analysis of earliness in the potato.Acta. agric. scand. 7:361–388.Google Scholar
  10. Reestman, A. J. & de Wit, C. T., 1959. Yield and size distribution of potatoes as influenced by seed rate.Neth. J. agric. Sci. 7:257–68.Google Scholar
  11. Wardlaw, I. F., 1967. The effect of water stress on translocation in relation to photosynthesis and growth. I. Effects during grain development in wheat.Aust. J. biol. Sci. 20:25–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Watson, D. J., 1947. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties and within and between years.Ann. Bot. 11:41–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Gray
    • 1
  • J. C. Holmes
    • 1
  1. 1.The Edinburgh School of AgricultureEdinburghScotland

Personalised recommendations