Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 601–612

Psychological reactance and its relationship to normal personality variables

  • Edmund Thomas Dowd
  • Fred Wallbrown
  • Daniel Sanders
  • Janice M. Yesenosky
Article

Abstract

This study investigated the dimensions of normal personality style associated with psychological reactance. Participants consisted of 326 graduate and undergraduate students. They took the California Psychological Inventory—Revised, the Therapeutic Reactance Scale (TRS), and the Fragebogen zur Messung der psychologischen Reactanz (Questionnaire for the Measurement of Psychological Reactance). Results showed that the reactant individual has a personality style characterized by having a lack of interest in making a good impression on others, being somewhat careless about meeting obligations, being less tolerant of other's beliefs, resisting rules and regulations, being more concerned about problems and worried about the future, and being more inclined to express strong feelings and emotions. Separate analyses by sex on the TRS suggested that reactant women had a personality style that was more decisive, more sociable, and more self-assured than nonreactant women. Conversely, reactant individuals tended to be more concerned with problems and the future than did nonreactant individuals, although this difference did not appear for the subsample of women only.

Key words

psychological reactance personality style 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beutler, L. E. (1979). Toward specific psychological therapies for specific conditions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 882–897.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brehm, J. W. (1966).A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981).Psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cooley, W., & Lohnes, P. (1971).Multivariate data analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Courchaine, K. E. (1993).The role of client reactance on counselor social influence and the therapeutic alliance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.Google Scholar
  6. Dowd, E. T., Hughes, S., Brockbank, L., Halpain, D., Seibel, C. & Seibel, P. (1988). Compliance-based and defiance-based intervention strategies and psychological reactance in the treatment of free and unfree behavior.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dowd, E. T., Milne, C. R., & Wise, S. L. (1991). The Therapeutic Reactance Scale: A measure of psychological reactance.Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 541–545.Google Scholar
  8. Dowd, E. T., & Wallbrown, F. (1993). Motivational components of client reactance.Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 533–538.Google Scholar
  9. Garfield, S. L. (1978). Research on client variables in psychotherapy. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 191–232). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Gough, H. G. (1987).California Psychological Inventory administrator's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  11. Graybar, S. R., Antonnucio, D. O., Boutilier, L. R. & Varble, D. L. (1989). Psychological reactance as a factor affecting patient compliance to physician advice.Scandinavian Journal of Behavior Therapy, 18, 43–51.Google Scholar
  12. Horvath, A. O., & Goheen, M. D. (1990). Factors mediating the success of defiance- and compliance-based interventions.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson, D. (1984)Personality Research Form manual (3rd ed.), Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  14. Jahn, D. L., & Lichstein, K. L. (1980). The resistive client: A neglected phenomenon in behavior therapy.Behavior Modification, 4, 303–320.Google Scholar
  15. Lambert, M. J. (1991). Introduction to psychotherapy research. In L. E. Beutler & M. Crago (Eds.),Psychotherapy research: An international review of programmatic studies (pp. 7–8). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  16. Loucka, P. A. (1991). Client reactance and counselor interpretations: Do they make a difference? (Doctoral Dissertation, Kent State University, 1990).Dissertation Abstracts International, 52-01B, 522.Google Scholar
  17. Mallon, K. F. (1992).A scale for assessing psychological reactance proneness: Reliability and validity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska—Lincoln.Google Scholar
  18. McKay, J. K., Dowd, E. T., & Rollin, S. A. (1982). Clients' characteristics as mediating variables in perception of counselors' social influence.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 523–526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Merz, J. (1983). Fragebogen zur Messung der psychologischen Reactanz [Questionnaire for the measurement of psychological reactance].Diagnostica, Band XXIX 75–82.Google Scholar
  20. Pedhazur, E. (1982).Multivariate regression in behavioral, research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  21. Rohrbaugh, M., Tennen, H., Press, S., & White, L. (1981). Compliance, defiance, and therapeutic paradox.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 454–467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Shoham-Salomon, V., Avner, R., & Neeman, R. (1989). You're changed if you do and changed if you don't: Mechanisms underlying paradoxical interventions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 590–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Swoboda, J. S., Dowd, E. T., & Wise, S. L. (1990). Reframing and restraining directives in the treatment of clinical depression.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 254–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. (1985). The importance of structure coefficients in regression research.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 203–209.Google Scholar
  25. Thorndike, R. (1978).Correlational procedures for research. New York: Gardner.Google Scholar
  26. Tracey, T. J., Ellickson, T. L., & Sherry, P. (1989). Reactance in relation to difference supervisory environments and counselor development.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 336–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wallbrown F. H., & Jones, J. A. (1992). Reevaluating the factor structure of the revised California Psychological Inventory.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 379–386.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edmund Thomas Dowd
    • 1
  • Fred Wallbrown
    • 1
  • Daniel Sanders
    • 1
  • Janice M. Yesenosky
    • 1
  1. 1.Kent State UniversityKent

Personalised recommendations