Schizophrenic psychopathology is heterogeneous and multidimensional. Various strategies have been developed over the past several years to assess and measure more accurately discrete domains of psychopathology. One of the more fruitful strategies to investigate more homogenous domains of psychopathology has been the positive-negative syndrome approach. However, this approach is unable to address a number of important issues. Most schizophrenics present a mixed syndrome; the criteria for what constitutes a positive and negative syndrome are variable; distinguishing primary from secondary negative symptoms can be difficult. In order to address some of these problems, we propose the introduction of a five syndrome model based on a reanalysis of factor analytic procedures used on 240 schizophrenics assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We present data on a 5-factor solution which appears to best fit the psychopathological data and which is supported by three independent and comparable factor analyses; negative, positive, excitement, cognitive and depression/anxiety domains of psychopathology give patients their individual mark. Data on internal consistency of the five factors and on initial validation using demographic and clinical variables are presented.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Strauss J, Carpenter WT, Bartko J. The diagnosis and understanding of schizophrenia, III: Speculations on the process that underlie schizophrenic symptoms and signs.Schizophrenia Bulletin 1:61–69, 1974.Google Scholar
- 2.Crow TJ. Molecular pathology of schizophrenia: More than one disease process?British Medical Journal 260:66–68, 1980.Google Scholar
- 8.Ardnt S, Alliger RJ, Andreasen N. The distinction of positive and negative symptoms: The failure of a two-dimensional model.British Journal of Psychiatry 158:317–322, 1991.Google Scholar
- 12.Rummel RJ.Applied factor analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
- 13.Gorsuch RL.Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.Google Scholar
- 14.Coovert MD, McNelis. Determining the number of common factors in factor analysis. A review and program.Educational Psychological Measurement 48:687–692, 1988.Google Scholar
- 15.Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS.Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins, 1989.Google Scholar
- 16.American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd Ed, DSM-III). Washington, DC: APA, 1980.Google Scholar
- 17.Bell M, Lysaker P, Millstein R, et al. Pyramidical model of schizophrenia: Factor replication and implications for subtyping. 145th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (Poster), 1992.Google Scholar
- 18.Lépine JP, Piron JJ, Chapatot E. Factor analysis of the PANSS in schizophrenia patients. In: Psychiatry today: Accomplishments and Promises (eds. Stefanis CN, Soldatos CR, Rabavilas AD). Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1989.Google Scholar
- 19.Lindenmayer JP, Grochowski S, Mabugat L. Clozapine effects on positive and negative symptoms: A six month trial in treatment refractory schizophrenics. J. Clin. Psychopharmacology, 1994 (in press).Google Scholar