Advertisement

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 16, Issue 2–3, pp 181–205 | Cite as

Poverty, public assistance, and children in intact and single-mother families

  • Lingxin Hao
Article

Abstract

This article examines the effects of poverty, public assistance, and family structure on school-age children's home environment and developmental outcomes using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. The central question of this study is whether public support negatively affects school-age children's developmental outcomes, thereby contributing to the intergenerational transmission of welfare dependency. The results show that long duration and late timing of poverty have a detrimental effect on home environment and child developmental outcomes. Long duration of public assistance disturbs reading ability for children of intact families only. Late timing of public assistance actually enhances the cognitive and emotional environment and has a greater effect on the emotional environment for single-mother families. Long duration and late timing of single motherhood are detrimental to the emotional environment. Taken together, the findings suggest that the process of intergenerational transmission of welfare dependency during school-age years is primarily attributable to poverty and single motherhood rather than the duration and timing of public assistance.

Key Words

child development poverty public assistance single motherhood 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astone, N. M., & McLanahan, S. S. (1991). Family structure, parental practice and high school completion.American Sociological Review, 56, 309–320.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, P. C., Keck, C. K., Mott, F. L., & Quinlan, S. V. (1993)NLSY child handbook. Columbus: Ohio State University, Center for Human Resource Research.Google Scholar
  3. Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. (1983).The dynamics of dependence: The routes to selfsufficiency (Report prepared for Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Urban Systems Research and Engineering, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Bowlby, J. (1969).Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley, R. H., & Caldwell, B. M. (1980). The relation of home environment, cognitive competence, and IQ among males and females.Child Development, 51, 1140–1148.Google Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1988). Interacting systems in human development research paradigms: Present and future. In N. Bolger, A. Caspi, G. Downey, & M. Moorehouse (Eds.),Persons in context: Developmental processes (pp. 25–49). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cargile, S. D., & Woods, J. E. (1988). Strengthening black students' academic preparedness for higher education.Journal of Black Studies, 19, 150–162.Google Scholar
  8. Carnegie Corporation of New York. (1994).Starting points: Meeting the needs of our youngest children. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Caughy, M. O., Dipietro, J. A., & Strobino, D. M. (1994). Day-care participation as a protective factor in the cognitive development of low-income children.Child Development, 65, 457–471.Google Scholar
  10. Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1993).Does Head Start make a difference? (Working paper number 4406). Cambridge, MA: National, Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  11. Desai, S., Chase-Lansdale, P. L., & Michael, R. T. (1989). Mother or market? Effects of maternal employment on the intellectual ability of 4-year-old children.Demography, 26, 545–561.Google Scholar
  12. Dornbusch, S. M., Carlsmith, J. M., Bushwall, S. J., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, H., Hastorf, A. H., & Gross, R. T. (1985). Single parents, extended households, and the control of adolescents.Child Development, 56, 326–341.Google Scholar
  13. Duncan, G. J. (1983). [Prepared statement on broken families]. InHearing before the Subcommittee on Family and Human Services of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources (U.S. Senate, pp. 233–238). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  14. Duncan, G. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebanov, P. K. (1994). Economic deprivation and early childhood development.Child Development, 65, 296–318.Google Scholar
  15. Eggebeen, D. J., & Lichter, D. T. (1991). Race, family structure, and changing poverty among American children.American Sociological Review, 56, 801–817.Google Scholar
  16. Elardo, R., & Bradley, R. H. (1981). The home observation for measurement of the environment (HOME) scale: A review of research.Developmental Review, 1, 113–145.Google Scholar
  17. Furstenberg, F. F., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Morgan, S. P. (1987).Adolescent mothers in later life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. S. (1986).Single mothers and their children: A new American dilemma. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Garrett, P., Ng'andu N., & Ferron, J. (1994) Poverty experiences of young children and the quality of their home environments.Child Development, 65, 331–345.Google Scholar
  20. Gottschalk, P. (1990). AFDC participation across generations.American Economic Review, 80, 367–371.Google Scholar
  21. Guo, G., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Harris, K. M. (1992).Grade retention and persistent economic deprivation among urban black children. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  22. Hao, L. (1995). How does a single mother choose kin and welfare support?Social Science Research, 24, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hofferth, S. L. (1987). The children of teen childbearers. In S. L. Hofferth & C. D. Hayes (Eds.),Risking the future (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  24. Korenman, S., Miller, J. E., & Sjaastad, J. E. (1993).Long-term poverty and child development in the United States: Results from the NLSY (working paper). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Humphrey Institute for Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  25. Krein, S. F., & Beller, A. H. (1988). Educational attainment of children from singleparent families: Differences by exposure, gender, and race.Demography, 25, 221–234.Google Scholar
  26. Leibowitz, A., Eisin, M., & Chow, W. K. (1986). An economic model of teenage pregnancy decision making.Demography, 23, 67–77.Google Scholar
  27. Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A.. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.),Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4., pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. McLanahan, S. (1985). Family structure and the reproduction of poverty.American Journal of Sociology, 90, 873–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLeod, J. D., & Shanahan, M. J. (1993). Poverty, parenting, and children's mental health.American Sociological Review, 58, 351–366.Google Scholar
  30. Mare, R. D. (1982). Socioeconomic effects on child mortality in the United States.American Journal of Public Health, 72, 539–547.Google Scholar
  31. Mauldon, J. (1990). The effect of marital disruption on children's health.Demography, 27, 431–446.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, C. A., Fine, A., Adams-Taylor, S., & Schorr, L. B. (1989).Monitoring children's health: Key indicators. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, J. E., & Korenman, S. (1993).Poverty dynamics and child well-being in the United States. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  34. Moffitt, R. (1983). An economic model of welfare stigma.American Economic Review, 73, 1023–1035.Google Scholar
  35. Moffitt, R. (1992). Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system: A review.Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 1–61.Google Scholar
  36. Parcel, T. L., & Menaghan, E. G. (1994). Early parental work, family social capital, and early childhood outcomes.American Journal of Sociology, 99, 972–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patterson, G. R. (1986). Performance models for antisocial boys.American Psychologist, 41, 432–444.Google Scholar
  38. Phillips, D. A., Voran, M., Kisker, E., Howes, C., & Whitebook, M. (1994). Child care for children in poverty: Opportunity or inequality?Child Development, 65, 472–492.Google Scholar
  39. Sroufe, L. A. (1979). The coherence of individual development: Early care, attachment, and subsequent developmental issues.American Psychologist, 34, 834–841.Google Scholar
  40. Steinberg, L. (1987). Single parents, stepparents, and the susceptibility of adolescents to antisocial peer pressure.Child Development, 58, 269–275.Google Scholar
  41. U. S. Bureau of the Census. (1992).Statistical abstract of the United States (112th ed.) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lingxin Hao
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of IowaIowa City
  2. 2.RANDSanta Monica

Personalised recommendations