Abstract
The magnetic ground state, magnetic anisotropies and spin excitations of surfaces, interfaces and ultra-thin films of ferromagnetic 3d-metals are discussed. Enhanced magnetic ground state moments and altered hyperfine fields as predicted by ab initio band calculations have not been conclusively verified by experiments up to now. Future calculations should take into account dipolar fields and the role of interface roughness. Very large magnetic anisotropies are observed at magnetic surfaces and interfaces. In Ni/Cu multilayered films, the superposition of surface and stress-induced anisotropies was used to switch the easy axis of magnetization from the film plane to a perpendicular orientation by a proper choice of the Ni layer thickness. This could be an attractive possibility to develop new magnetic materials for technical applications. The temperature dependence of the spontaneous magnetization at surfaces and in ultra-thin films deviates from the behaviour of bulk material. Size effects as well as surface effects of spin wave excitations are discussed, comparing theoretical and experimental results. The need for more complete theories including surface exchange, surface anisotropy and realistic surface structures is emphasized.
Keywords
Magnetic Anisotropy Spin Wave Hyperfine Field Multilayered Film Easy AxisPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]A.J. Freeman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 35(1983)31.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [2]C.S. Wang and A.J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B24(1981)4364.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [3]C.L. Fu and A.J. Freeman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 69(1987)L1.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [4]S. Ohnishi, M. Weinert and A.J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B30(1984)36.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [5]C.L. Fu, A.J. Freeman and T. Oguchi, Phys. Rev. B54(1985)2700.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [6]U. Gradmann, G. Waller, R. Feder and E. Tamura, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 31 – 34(1983)883.Google Scholar
- [7]G. Bayreuther and G. Lugert, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 35(1983)50.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [8]J. Tyson, A.H. Owens, J.C. Walker and G. Bayreuther. J. Appl. Phys. 52(1981)2487.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [9]G. Bayreuther, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A1(1983)19.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [10]J. Korecki and U. Gradmann, Europhys. Lett. 2(1986)651.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [11]A.H. Owens, J. Tyson, G. Bayreuther and J.C. Walker, Hyp. Int. 10(1981)805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]J. Korecki and U. Gradmann, Hyp. Int. 28(1986)931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]G. Lugert and G. Bayreuther, Phys. Rev. B38(1988)11068.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [14]G. Bayreuther, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 38(1983)273.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [15]P.H. Christensen and S. Morup, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 35(1983)130.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [16]R. Droste, G. Stern and J.C. Walker, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 54–57(1986)763.Google Scholar
- [17]G. Lugert and G. Bayreuther, to be published.Google Scholar
- [18]H.J. Elmers and U. Gradmann, Phys. Rev. Lett., to appear.Google Scholar
- [19]A.J. Freeman, private communication.Google Scholar
- [20]G. Lugert and G. Bayreuther, to be published.Google Scholar
- [21]L.N. Liebermann, J. Clinton, D.M. Edwards and M. Mathon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25(1970)232.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [22]L. Néel, J. phys. radium 15(1954)225.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [23]U. Gradmann and J. Müller, Phys. Stat. Sol. 27(1968)313.Google Scholar
- [24]U. Gradmann, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 54 – 57(1986)733.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [25]N.C. Koon, B.T. Jonker, F.A. Volkening, J.J. Krebs and G.A. Prinz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987)2463.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [26]C.M. Schneider, J.J. de Miguel, P. Bressler, J. Garbe, S. Ferrer, R. Miranda and J. Kirschner,Proc. ICM 88, Paris 1988, to be published.Google Scholar
- [27]B. Heinrich, private communication.Google Scholar
- [28]W. Robl and G. Bayreuther,ICMFS 1988, Le Creusot, to be published.Google Scholar
- [29]U. Gradmann, R. Bergholz and E. Bergter, IEEE Trans. Magn. 20(1984)1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [30]J.G. Gay and R. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56(1986)2728.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [31]L. Fritsche, H. Lenz and J. Noffke, to be published.Google Scholar
- [32]F. Bloch, Z. Phys. 61(1930)206.ADSMATHGoogle Scholar
- [33]M.J. Klein and R.S. Smith, Phys. Rev. 81(1951)378.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [34]S.J. Glass and M.J. Klein, Phys. Rev. 109(1958)288.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [35]W. Döring, Z. Naturforschung. 16a(1961)1008; 1146.Google Scholar
- [36]A. Corciovei, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 20(1961)162.Google Scholar
- [37]J.C. Levy and J.L. Motchane, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 9(1972)721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [38]I. Vincze and J. Kollar, Phys. Rev. B6(1972)1066.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [39]J.C. Walker, Hyp. Int. 24 – 26(1985)419.Google Scholar
- [40]M. Przybylski and U. Gradmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59(1987)1152.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [41]G.T. Rado, Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 2(1957)127.Google Scholar
- [42]D.L. Mills and A.A. Maradudin, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28(1967)1855.Google Scholar
- [43]M. HÄrting and G. Bayreuther, to be published.Google Scholar
- [44]G.P. Stern, Z.O. Qiu, H. Tang and J.C. Walker, Hyp. Int. 41(1988)709.Google Scholar
- [45]S.D. Bader, E.R. Moog and P. Grünberg, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 53(1986)L295.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [46]J. Mathon and S.B. Ahmad, Phys. Rev. B37(1988)660.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [47]G.T. Rado, J. Appl. Phys. 55(1984)2505.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [48]D.T. Pierce, R.J. Celotta, J. Unguris and H.C. Siegmann, Phys. Rev. B26(1982)2566.ADSGoogle Scholar
- [49]U. Gradmann and J. Müller, Z. f. angew. Phys. 30(1970)87.Google Scholar
- [50]E.M. Gyorgy, J.F. Dillon, Jr., D.B. McWhan, L.W. Rupp and L.R. Testardi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45(1980)57.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [51]H. Hasegawa, Surf. Sci. 182(1987)591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [52]M. Stampanoni, A. Vaterlaus, M. Aeschlimann and F. Meier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59(1987) 2483.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [53]F. Schedlbauer, R. Venos and G. Bayreuther, unpublished.Google Scholar