Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 17–30 | Cite as

Approaches to learning, their context and relationship to assessment performance

  • J. B. Beckwith
Article

Abstract

Relationships between approaches to learning, as measured by the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ), prior knowledge of subject area, and performance on a multiple-choice test following a 15 × 2 hour unit in basic psychology were investigated. Subjects were 105 first year tertiary students, of mean age 19.9 years, and predominantly female (82.9%). Approaches to learning were unrelated to assessment performance, and prior knowledge did not relate to a deep approach although it did predict performance. The findings were interpreted in terms of additional elements in the teaching-learning process, and the role of the SPQ was seen as a stimulus to thinking about that process.

Keywords

Prior Knowledge Subject Area Assessment Performance Additional Element Deep Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, G. S. (1964).Measurement and Evaluation in Education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, S. N. (1976).Teaching Styles and Pupil Progress. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
  3. Biggs, J. B. (1970). ‘Faculty patterns in study behaviour’,Australian Journal of Psychology 22, 161–174.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. B. (1973). ‘Study behaviour and performance in objective and essay formats’,The Australian Journal of Education 17, 157–167.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, J. B. (1976). ‘Dimensions of study behavior: another look at ATI’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 68–80.Google Scholar
  6. Biggs, J. B. (1978). ‘Individual and group differences in study processes’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 48, 266–279.Google Scholar
  7. Biggs, J. B. (1985). ‘The role of metalearning in study processes’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 55, 185–212.Google Scholar
  8. Biggs. J. B. (1987a).Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  9. Biggs, J. B. (1987b).Study Process Questionnaire Manual. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  10. Biggs, J. B. and Kirby, J. R. (1984). ‘Differentiation of learning processes within ability groups’,Educational Psychology 4, 21–39.Google Scholar
  11. Biggs, J. B. and Rihn, B. A. (1984). ‘The effects of intervention on deep and surface approaches to learning’, in Kirby, J. R. (ed.),Cognitive Strategies and Educational Performance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Boud, D. (ed.) (1985).Problem-Based Learning in Education for the Professions. Sydney, Australia: HERDSA.Google Scholar
  13. Boyle, D. G. (1969).A Student's Guide to Piaget. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. S. (1960).The Process of Education. Cambridge, Massachusets: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bruner, J. S. (1966).Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Entwistle, N. (1981).Styles of Learning and Teaching. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Entwistle, N. J., Hanley, M., and Hounsell, D. J. (1979). ‘Identifying distinctive approaches to studying’,Higher Education 8, 365–380.Google Scholar
  18. Entwistle, N. and Kozeki, B. (1985). ‘Relationships between school motivation, approaches to studying, and attainment among British and Hungarian adolescents’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 55, 124–137.Google Scholar
  19. Entwistle, N. J. and Ramsden, P. (1983).Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  20. Entwistle, N. and Tait, H. (1990). ‘Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments’,Higher Education 19, 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fransson, A. (1977). ‘On qualitative differences in learning: IV effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 47, 244–257.Google Scholar
  22. Grivas, J., Engle, T. L., and Snellgrove, L. (1981).Experiments and Activities for Psychology Students. Melbourne: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  23. Heath, R. (1964).The Reasonable Adventurer. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lokan, J. J. and Biggs, J. B. (1982). ‘Student characteristics and motivational and process factors in relation to styles of career development’,Journal of Vocational Behavior 21, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, E. and Ramsden, P. (1987). ‘Learning skills, or skill in learning?’, in Richardson, J. T. E., Eysenck, M. W., and Piper, D. W. (eds.),Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. London: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Marton, F. and Saljo, R. (1976a). ‘On qualitative differences in learning: I - outcome and process’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4–11.Google Scholar
  27. Marton, F. and Saljo, R. (1976b). ‘On qualitative differences in learning: II - outcome as a function of the learner's perception of the task’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 115–127.Google Scholar
  28. Meyer, J. H. F. and Parsons, P. (1989). ‘Approaches to studying and course perceptions using the Lancaster inventory - a comparative study’,Studies in Higher Education 14, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H. (1975).SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Pask, G. (1976). ‘Styles and strategies of learning’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 128–148.Google Scholar
  31. Ramsden, P. (1985). ‘Student learning research: retrospect and prospect’,Higher Education Research and Development 4, 51–69.Google Scholar
  32. Rigney, J. W. (1978). ‘Learning strategies: a theoretical perspective’, in O'Neill, H. F. (ed.),Learning Strategies. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rogers, C. R. (1969).Freedom to Learn. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.Google Scholar
  34. Schmeck, R. R. (1983). ‘Learning styles of college students’, in Dillon, R. and Schmeck, R. R. (eds.),Individual Differences in Cognition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Snelbecker, G. E. (1974).Learning Theory, Instructional Theory, and Psychoeducational Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  36. Thomas, P. R. and Bain, J. D. (1984). ‘Contextual dependence of learning approaches: the effects of assessment’,Human Learning 3, 227–240.Google Scholar
  37. Watkins, D. (1983). ‘Assessing tertiary study processes’,Human Learning 2, 29–37.Google Scholar
  38. Watkins, D. and Hattie, J. (1981). ‘The learning processes of Australian university students: investigations of contextual and personological factors’,British Journal of Educational Psychology 51, 384–393.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. B. Beckwith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Intellectual Disability StudiesPhillip Institute of TechnologyBundooraAustralia

Personalised recommendations