Advertisement

Influence of muscle fibre shortening on estimates of conduction velocity and spectral frequencies from surface electromyographic signals

  • E. Schulte
  • D. Farina
  • R. Merletti
  • G. Rau
  • C. Disselhorst-Klug
Article

Abstract

The study of surface electromyographic (EMG) signals under dynamic contractions is becoming increasingly important. However, knowledge of the methodological issues that may affect such analysis is still limited. The aim of the study was to analyse the effect of fibre shortening on estimates of conduction velocity (CV) and mean power spectral frequency (MNF) from surface EMG signals. Single fibre action potentials were simulated, as detected by commonly used spatial filters, for different fibre lengths. No physiological modifications were included with changes in fibre length, and thus only geometrical artifacts related to fibre shortening were investigated. The simulation results showed that the dependence of CV and MNF on fibre shortening is affected by the fibre location, electrode position and the spatial filter applied. With shortening of up to 50% for a fibre of 50 mm semi-length, the variations in CV and MNF estimates with shortening in bipolar recordings were 0.5% (CV) and 0.7% (MNF) for superficial fibres, and 3.6% and 5.1% for deeper fibres. Using the longitudinal double differential filter, under the same conditions, the percent variation was 0% and 0.2%, and 24.7% and 15.8%, respectively. The main conclusions were, first, muscle fibre shortening can significantly affect estimates of CV and MNF, especially for short fibre lengths. However, for long (semi-length>50mm) and superficial fibres, this effect is limited for shortenings of up to 50% of the initial fibre length. Secondly, CV and MNF are almost equally affected by changes in muscle length; and, thirdly, sensitivity to fibre shortening depends on the spatial filter applied for signal detection.

Keywords

Surface EMG Dynamic EMG Spatial filtering EMG modelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arabadzhiev, T. I., Dimitrov, G. V., andDimitrova, N. A. (2003): ‘Simulation analysis of the ability to estimate motor unit propagation velocity non-invasively by different two-channel methods and types of multi-electrodes’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,13, pp. 403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt-Nielsen, L., Gantchev, N., andSinkiaer, T. (1992): ‘The influence of muscle fiber length on muscle fiber conduction velocity and development of muscle fatigue’,Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,85, pp. 1428–1437Google Scholar
  3. Balestra, G., Frassinelli, S., Knaflitz, M., andMolinari, F. (2001): ‘Time-frequency analysis of surface myoelectric signals during athletic movement’,IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.,20, pp. 106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benedetti, M. G. (2001): ‘Muscle activation intervals and EMG envelope in clinical gait analysis’,IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.,20, pp. 33–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonato, P., Cheng, M. S., Gonzalez-Cueto, J., Leardini, A., O'Connor, J., andRoy, S. H. (2001): ‘EMG-based measures of fatigue during a repetitive squat exercise’,IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.,20, pp. 133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, T., Galea, V., andMcComas, A. J. (1996): ‘Muscle shortening, response latency, and conduction velocity’,Muscle Nerve,19, pp. 1493–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cechetto, A. D., Parker, P. A., andScott, R. N. (2001): ‘The effects of four time-varying factors on the mean frequency of a myoelectric signal’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,11, pp. 347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimitrov, G. V., andDimitrova, N. A. (1998): ‘Fundamentals of power spectra of extracellular potentials produced by a skeletal muscle fiber of finit length. II. Effect of parameters altering with functional state’,Med. Eng. Phys.,20, pp. 702–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimitrov, G. V., Disselhorst-Klug, C., Dimitrova, N. A., Schulte, E., andRau, G. (2003): ‘Simulation analysis of the ability of different types of multi-electrodes to increase selectivity of detection and to reduce cross-talk’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,13, pp. 125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimitrova, N. A., Dimitrov, G. V., andLateva, Z. C. (1991): ‘Influence of the fibre length on the power spectrum of single muscle fibre extracellular potentials’,Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.,31, pp. 387–398Google Scholar
  11. Dimitrova, N. A., Dimitrov, G. V., andNikitin, O. A. (2001): ‘Longitudinal variations of characteristic frequencies of skeletal muscle fibre potentials detected by a bipolar or multi-electrode’,J. Med. Eng. Tech.,25, pp. 34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Disselhorst-Klug, C., Silny, J., andRau, G. (1997): ‘Improvement of spatial resolution in surface-EMG: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different spatial filters’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,44, pp. 567–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ebenbilchler, G. (2001): ‘Dynamic EMG: a clinicians perspective’,IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.,20, pp. 34–35Google Scholar
  14. Farina, D., Merletti, R., Nazzaro, M., andCaruso, I. (2001): ‘Effect of joint angle on EMG variables in leg and thigh muscles’,IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag.,20, pp. 62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farina, D., andMerletti, R. (2001): ‘A novel approach for precise simulation of the EMG signal detected by surface electrodes’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,48, pp. 637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farina, D., Cescon, C., andMerletti, R. (2002a): ‘Influence of anatomical, physical and detection system parameters on surface EMG’,Biol. Cybern.,86, pp. 445–456zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farina, D., Madeleine, P., Graven-Nielsen, T., Merletti, R., andArendt-Nielsen, L. (2002b): ‘Standardizing surface electromyogram recordings for accessment of activity and fatigue in the human upper trapezius muscle’,Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.,86, pp. 469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farina, D., andMerletti, R. (2003): ‘A novel approach for estimating muscle fiber conduction velocity by spatial and temporal filtering of surface EMG signals’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,50, pp. 1340–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farina, D., Merletti, R., andEnoka, R. M. (2004a): ‘The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG’,J. Appl. Physiol.,96, pp. 1486–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farina, D., Pozzo, M., Merlo, E., Bottin, A., andMerletti, R. M. (2004b): ‘Assessment of muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during fatiguing dynamic contractions’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Farina, D., Mesin, L., Martina, S., andMerletti, R. (2004c): ‘Comparison of spatial filter selectivity in surface myoelectric signal detection-Influence of the volume conductor model’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,42, pp. 114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gydikov, A., andKosarov, D. (1972): ‘Volume conduction of the potentials from separate motor units in human muscle’,Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.,13, pp. 319–343Google Scholar
  23. Gydikov, A., andKosarov, D. (1973): ‘The influence of various factors on the shape of the myopotentials in using monopolar electrodes’,Electromyogr: Clin. Neurophysiol.,13, pp. 319–343Google Scholar
  24. Gydikov, A., Gerilovski, L., Radicheva, N., andTroyanova, N. (1986): ‘Influence of the muscle fiber end geometry on the extracellular potentials’,Biol. Cybern.,54, pp. 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hermens, H. J., andFreriks, B. (1997): ‘The state of the art in sensor placement procedures of surface electromyography’ Deliverable 5, SENIAM European Concerted Action, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  26. Hogrel, J. Y., Duchene, J., andMartini, J. (1998): ‘Variability of some sEMG parameter estimates with electrode locations’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,8, pp. 305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen, C., Vasseljen, O., andWestgaard, R. H. (1993): ‘The influence of electrode position on bipolar surface electromyogram recordings of the upper trapezius muscle’,Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.,67, pp. 266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kennedy, P. M., andCresswell, A. G. (2001): ‘The effect of muscle length on motor-unit recruitment during isometric plantar flexion in humans’,Exp. Brain Res.,137, pp. 58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kleine, B. U., Praamsta, P., Blok, J. H., andStegeman, D. F. (1999): ‘Single motor unit discharge patterns recorded with multichannel sEMG’.Proc. Symp. Muscular Disorders in Computer Users, Copenhagen, pp. 175–179Google Scholar
  30. Kossev, A., Gantchev, N., Gydikov, A., Gerasimenko, Y., andChristova, P. (1992): ‘The effect of muscle fiber length change on motor unit potentials propagation velocity’,Electromyogr: Clin. Neurophysiol.,32, pp. 287–294Google Scholar
  31. Lateva, Z. C., Dimitrova, N. A., andDimitrov, G. V. (1993): ‘Effect of the recording electrode position along a muscle fiber on surface potential power spectrum’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,3, pp. 195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, W., andSakamoto, K. (1996): ‘The influence of location of electrode on muscle fiber conduction velocity and EMG power spectrum during voluntary isometric contractions measured with surface array electrodes’,Appl. Human Sci.,15, pp. 25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin, J. P., Brown, J. K., andWalsh, E. G. (1997): ‘Soleus muscle length, stretch reflex excitability, and the contractile properties of muscle in children and adults: a study of the functional joint angle’,Dev. Med. Child. Neurol.,39, pp. 469–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lo Conte, L. R., andMerletti, R. (1995): ‘Advances in processing of surface myoelectric signals: Part 2’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,33, pp. 373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Masuda, T., andSadoyama, T. (1987): ‘Skeletal muscles from which the propagation of motor unit action potentials is detectable with a surface electrode array’,Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.,67, pp. 421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Masuda, T., Masuda, T., Sadoyama, T., Inaki, M., andKatsuda, S. (1999): ‘Changes in surface EMG parameters during static and dynamic fatiguing contractions’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,9, pp. 39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Masuda, T., Kizuka, T., Zhe, J. Y., Yamada, H., Saitou, K., Sadoyama, T., andOkada, M. (2001): ‘Influence of contraction force and speed on muscle fiber conduction velocity during dynamic voluntary exercise’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,11, pp. 85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGill, K. C., andDorfman, L. J. (1984): ‘High-resolution alignment of sampled waveforms’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,31, pp. 462–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merletti, R., Knaflitz, M., andDe Luca, C. J. (1990): ‘Myoelectric manifestations of fatigue in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions’,J. Appl. Physiol.,69, pp. 1810–1820Google Scholar
  40. Merletti, R., Lo Conte, L. R., Cisari, C., andMassazza, U. (1993): ‘Effect of ankle joint position on electrically evoked surface myoelectric signals of the tibialis anterior muscle’,Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.,74, pp. 501–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morimoto, S. (1986): ‘Effect of length change in muscle fibers on conduction velocity in human motor units’,Jpn. J. Physiol.,36, pp. 773–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Okada, M. (1987): ‘Effect of muscle length on surface EMG wave forms in isometric contractions’,Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.,56, pp. 462–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plonsey, R., andBarr, R. C. (1988): ‘Bioelectricity-A quantitative approach’ (Plenum Press, New York, 1988)Google Scholar
  44. Rau, G., Disselhorst-Klug, C., andSilny, J. (1997): ‘Noninvasive approach to motor unit characterization, muscle structure, membrane dynamics and neuronal control’,J. Biomech.,30, pp. 441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reucher, H., Rau, G., andSilny, J. (1987a): ‘Spatial filtering of noninvasive multielectrode EMG: Part I-Introduction to measuring technique and applications’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,34, pp. 98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reucher, H., Silny, J., andRau, G. (1987b): ‘Spatial filtering of noninvasive multielectrode EMG: Part II-Filter performance in theory and modeling’,IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,34, pp. 106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roy, S., DeLuca, C. J., andSchneider, J. (1986): ‘Effects of electrode location on myoelectric conduction velocità and median frequency estimates’,J. Appl. Physiol.,61, pp. 1510–1517Google Scholar
  48. Roy, S. H., Bonato, P., andKnaflitz, M. (1998): ‘EMG assessment of back muscle function during cyclical lifting’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,8, pp. 233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sadoyama, T., Masuda, T., Miyata, H., andKatsuta, S. (1988): ‘Fibre conduction velocity and fibre composition in human vastus lateralis’,Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol.,57, pp. 767–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sakamoto, K., andLi, W. (1997): ‘Effect of muscle length on distribution of the muscle fiber conduction velocity for the muscle biceps brachii’,Appl. Human Sci.,16, pp. 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schneider, J., Rau, G., andSilny, J. (1989): ‘A noninvasive EMG technique for investigating the excitation propagation in single motor units’,Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.,29, pp. 273–280Google Scholar
  52. Schulte, E., Farina, D., Rau, G., Merletti, R., andDisselhorst-Klug, C. (2003): ‘Single motor unit analysis from spatially filtered surface EMG signals-Part II: conduction velocity estimation’,Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.,41, pp. 338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Von Tscharner, V. (2002): ‘Time-frequency and principal-component methods for the analysis of EMGs recorded during a mildly fatiguing exercise on a cycle ergometer’,J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.,12, pp. 479–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wretling, M. L., Gerdle, B., andHenriksson-Larsen, K. (1987): ‘EMG: a non-invasive method for determination of fibre type proportion’,Acta Physiol. Scand.,131, pp. 627–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zuniga, E. N., andSimons, D. G. (1970): ‘Effects of skin electrode position on averaged electromyographic potentials’,Arch. Med. Rehab.,51, pp. 264–272Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Schulte
    • 1
  • D. Farina
    • 2
  • R. Merletti
    • 2
  • G. Rau
    • 1
  • C. Disselhorst-Klug
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Biomedical TechnologiesHelmholtz InstituteAachenGermany
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Elettronica, Laboratorio di Ingegneria del Sistema Neuromuscolare (LISiN)Politecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations