Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 75–79 | Cite as

Predatory behavior of the praying mantis,Tenodera aridifolia I. Effect of prey size on prey recognition

  • Taku Iwasaki
Article

Abstract

Predatory behavior and effect of prey size of the praying mantis,Tenodera aridifolia, was investigated using three-dimensional prey models. Parameters of prey such as width, length, shape (length/width), area (width×length) and volume were investigated for effects on Watch and Attack responses. Regression analyses suggest that volume is the most important variable in prey recognition. This behavioral trait is considered adaptive, since prey volume is the most reliable measurement for the energy content of the prey.

Keywords

Regression Analysis Important Variable Reliable Measurement Energy Content Animal Ecology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, P. C. E. 1986 The feeding behaviour of a sit-and-wait predator,Ranatra dispar (Heteroptera: Nepidae): The combined effect of food deprivation and prey size on the behavioural components of prey capture.Ethology 71: 315–332.Google Scholar
  2. Barros-Pita, J. C. & H. Maldonado 1970 A fovea in the praying mantis eye, II. Some morphological characteristics.Z. vergl. Physiol. 67: 79–92.Google Scholar
  3. Ewert, J. P. 1970 Neural mechanisms of prey-catching and avoidance behavior in the toad (Bufo bufo L.).Brain. Behav. and Evol. 3: 36–56.Google Scholar
  4. Holling, C. S. 1964 The analysis of complex population processes.Can. Entomol. 96: 335–347.Google Scholar
  5. Maldonado, H., L. Levin & J. C. Barros-Pita 1967 Hit distance and the predatory strike of the praying mantis.Z. vergl. Physiol. 56: 237–257.Google Scholar
  6. Mittelstaedt, H. 1957 Prey capture in mantids. In:Recent advances in invertebrate physiology. pp.51–57. Univ. Oreg. Pub., Oregon.Google Scholar
  7. Rilling, S., H. Mittelstaedt & K. D. Roeder 1959 Prey recognition in the praying mantis.Behaviour 14: 164–184.Google Scholar
  8. Rossel, S. 1983 Binocular stereopsis in an insect.Nature 302: 821–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Roth, G. 1976 Experimental analysis of the prey catching behavior ofHydromantes italicus Dann (Amphibia, Plethodontidae).J. comp. Physiol. 109: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taku Iwasaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyKyoto UniversitySakyo, KyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations