Journal of Ethology

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 53–62 | Cite as

Maternal behaviour of free-ranging sows during the first 8 days after farrowing

  • Davide Csermely
Article

Abstract

The maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic sows was studied. The sows were observed continuously during 1–2 h periods randomly distributed between 0730 and 1930, from farrowing to the 8th day. The behaviour parameters considered and the general experimental layout were the same as ones used in a previous study. In order to more precisely evaluate possible differences of behaviour between the outdoor and the indoor condition, this new study did not reveal great differences in maternal behaviour. Over time, the sows increased initiation and termination of nursing episodes, with no statistical difference between the sows' behaviour. There was a trend to reduce the variability of the behaviour repertoire over post-farrowing days. This may be the result of the sows' freedom of action and their ability to display the natural behaviours. The implications of environmental conditions on behaviour are discussed.

Keywords

Statistical Difference Animal Ecology Maternal Behaviour Natural Behaviour Experimental Layout 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Algers B. & P. Jensen 1985 Communication during suckling in the domestic pig. Effects of continuous noise.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 14: 49–61.Google Scholar
  2. Arellano P.E., C. Pijoan, L.D. Jacobson & B. Algers 1992 Stereotyped behaviour, social interactions and suckling pattern of pigs housed in groups or in single crates.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 35: 157–166.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter M.R. 1982 The nesting behaviour of sows and its disturbance by confinement at farrowing. In: W. Bessei (ed.),Disturbed behaviour in farm animals. pp. 101–114. E. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop Y.M.M., S.E. Fienberg & P.W. Holland 1975 Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Theory and Practice. 557 pp. MIT Press, Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
  5. Brouns F., F. MacMenemy & S.A. Edwards 1992 Dommance hierarchies in sows and the consequence for liveweight gain in competitive and non-competitive feeding systems.Proc, Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. Winter Meet.Google Scholar
  6. Castrèn H., B. Algers & P. Jensen 1989 Occurrence of unsuccessful sucklings in newborn piglets in a semi-natural environment.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 23: 61–73.Google Scholar
  7. Csermely D. & D.G.M. Wood-Gush 1986 Agonistic behaviour in grouped sows: I. The influence of feeding.Biol. Behav. 11: 244–252.Google Scholar
  8. Csermely D. & D.G.M. Wood-Gush 1990. Agonistic behaviour in grouped sows: II. How social rank affects feeding and drinking behaviour.Boll. Zool. 57: 55–58.Google Scholar
  9. Csermely D. & E. Nicosia 1991 Maternal behaviour in sows of different social rank.J. Ethol. 9: 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartsock T.G. & H.B. Graves 1976 Neonatal behaviour and nutrition-related mortality in domestic swine.J. Anim. Sci. 42: 235–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Horrell I. & J. Hodgson 1992a The basis of sow-piglet identification. 1. The identification by sows of their own piglets and the presence of intruders.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 33: 319–327.Google Scholar
  12. Horrell I. & J. Hodgson 1992b The basis of sow-piglet identification. 2. Cues used by piglets to identify their dam and home pen.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 33: 329–343.Google Scholar
  13. Hutson G.D. 1992 A comparison of operant responding by farrowing sows for food and nest-building materials.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 34: 221–230.Google Scholar
  14. Jensen P. 1986 Observations on the maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16: 131–142.Google Scholar
  15. Jensen P. 1988a Maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs. I: Results of a three-year study.Swedish Univ. Agric. Sciences, Report 22, 56 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Jensen P. 1988b Maternal behaviour and mother-young interactions during lactation in free-ranging domestic pigs.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 20: 297–308.Google Scholar
  17. Jensen P., K. Florén & I. Hobroh 1987 Periparturient changes in behaviour in free-ranging domestic pigs.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 17: 69–76.Google Scholar
  18. Jensen P. & I. Redbo 1987 Behaviour during nest leaving in free-ranging domestic pigs.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 18: 355–362.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen P., G. Stangel & B. Algers 1991 Nursing and suckling behaviour of semi-naturally kept pigs during the first 10 days postpartum.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 31: 195–209.Google Scholar
  20. Lewis N.J. & J.F. Hurnik 1985 The development of nursing in swine.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 14: 225–232.Google Scholar
  21. Newberry R.C. & D.G.M. Wood-Gush 1985 The suckling behaviour of domestic pigs in a semi-natural environment.Behaviour 95: 11–25.Google Scholar
  22. Petersen V., B. Recén & K. Vestergaard 1990 Behaviour of sows and piglets during farrowing under free-range conditions.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26: 169–179.Google Scholar
  23. Petherick J.C. 1983 A note on nursing termination and resting behaviour of suckling piglets.Appl. Anim. Ethol. 9: 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Siegel S. 1956 Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, 312 pp. McGraw-Hill Co., New York.Google Scholar
  25. Stangel G. & P. Jensen 1991 Behaviour of semi-naturally kept sows and piglets (except suckling) during 10 days postpartum.Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 31: 211–227.Google Scholar
  26. Whittemore C.T. & D. Fraser 1974 The nursing and suckling behaviour of pigs. II. Vocalizations of the sow in relation to suckling behaviour and milk ejection.Br. Vet. J. 130: 346–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Csermely
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biology and General PhysiologyUniversity of ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations