Journal of Ethology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 111–116 | Cite as

Visual and auditory cues in conspecific discrimination learning in Bengalese finches

  • Shigeru Watanabe
  • Tailing Jian
Article

Abstract

Four Bengalese finches were trained to discriminate 2 conspecific individuals in an operant chamber. Still visual images and contact calls were simultaneously presented to the subjects and specific (“correct”) perching response was reinforced with food. After the birds acquired the discrimination, they received the first test in which visual cues alone, auditory cues alone and combination of the 2 modalities were presented. Visual cues dominantly controlled the discriminative behavior of all birds. Then the subjects received the second test in which mixtures of the visual image of 2 stimulus birds appeared under 3 different auditory conditions, namely, no call, calls of 1 bird and calls of the other bird. Two subjects used the auditory cues when the visual stimulus was a mixture of 2 stimulus birds. These results suggest that the birds used less dominant cues when the dominant cues gave ambiguous information.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, S.D. & R.J. Dooling 1992 Perception of conspecific faces by Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): I. Natural faces.J. Comp. Psychol. 106: 203–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Candland, D.K. 1969 Discrimination of facial regions used by the domestic chicken in maintaining the social dominance order,J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 69: 281–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Howells, T.H. & D.O. Vine 1940 The innate differential in social learning,J. Abn. and Soc. Psychol. 35: 537–548.Google Scholar
  4. Poole, J. & D.G. Lander 1971 The pigeons's concept of pigeon.Psychon. Sci. 25: 157–158.Google Scholar
  5. Reynolds, G.S. 1961 Attention in the pigeon.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 4: 179–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ryan, C.M.E. 1982 Concept formation and individual recognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus).Behav. Analysis Let. 2: 213–220.Google Scholar
  7. Trillmich, F. 1976 Learning experiments on individual recognition in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).Z. Tierpsychol., 41: 372–395.Google Scholar
  8. Watanabe, S. 1992 Effects of Wulst and ectostriatal lesions on conspecific and individual discrimination in pigeons.Behav. Brain Res. 49: 197–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Watanabe, S. & Y. Ito 1991 Discrimination of individuals in pigeons,Bird Behav. 9: 20–29.Google Scholar
  10. Watanabe, S., E. Yamashita & M. Wakita 1993 Discrimination of video images of conspecific individuals in Bengalese finches.J. Ethol. 11: 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wilkie, D.M. & M.E. Masson 1976 Attention in the pigeon: A reevaluation.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 26: 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shigeru Watanabe
    • 1
  • Tailing Jian
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKeio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations