Ichthyological Research

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 117–124

Genetic markers distinguishing between the two subspecies of the rosy bitterling,Rhodeus ocellatus (Cyprinidae)

  • Yoshikazu Nagata
  • Tadashi Tetsukawa
  • Takanori Kobayashi
  • Ken-ichi Numachi
Article

Abstract

Eleven populations of the rosy bitterling,Rhodeus ocellatus, from different localities in Japan, were genetically compared at 16 protein-coding loci using starch-gel electrophoresis. Two loci,Ldh-2 andPgdh, were demonstrated as diagnostic markers for the identification of two subspecies;R. ocellatus kurumeus, which is native to Japan, andR. ocellatus ocellatus, which was introduced from China. The two subspecies were distinguished by the complete substitution of different alleles between them. Population ofR. ocellatus kurumeus occurring in Yao City, Osaka, and in Kanzaki, Saga Prefecture were genetically closely related to each other (genetic distance: D=0.056) but distantly so toR. ocellatus ocellatus from Saitama Prefecture (D=0.202 or 0.265). Electrophoretic analyses also elucidated the existence of hybrid populations of the two subspecies. The populations ofR. ocellatus kurumeus in Yao City had lower genetic variability and a lower incidence of white coloration on the ventral fins than populations of the same in Saga Prefecture. The present study strongly implies that the introduction of the foreign freshwater fishes with subspecific differentiation, into the original range of indigenous subspecies, should be averted not to bring the genetic pollution.

Key words

Rhodeus ocellatus isozyme hybridization inbreeding effects genetic introgression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Arai, R. 1978. Karyological approach to phylogenetics of bitterlings (Cyprinidae). Heredity, 32: 39–46.Google Scholar
  2. Echelle, A. A. and P. J. Connor. 1989. Rapid, geogrphically extensive genetic introgression after secondary contact between two pupfish species (Cyprinodon, Cyprinodontidae). Evolution, 43: 717–727.Google Scholar
  3. Harris, H. and D. A. Hopkinson. 1976. Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics. American Elsevier Publ. Co. Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  4. Kimura, S., S. Matsui, H. Wasada and K. Tachihara. 1986. On the rose bitterling,Rhodeus ocellatus subsp., in the Tatara River, Fukuoka Prefecture and its habitats. Sci. Bull. Fac. Agr., Kyushu Univ., 40: 239–247.Google Scholar
  5. Kimura, S. and Y. Nagata. 1992. Scientific name of Nippon-baratanago, a Japanese bitterling of the genusRhodeus. Japan. J. Ichthyol., 38: 425–429.Google Scholar
  6. May, B., J. E. Wright and M. Stoneking. 1979. Joint segregation of biochemical loci in Salmonidae: results from experiments withSalvelinus and review of the literature on other species. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 36: 1114–1128.Google Scholar
  7. Morishima, K. 1974. Genetic differentiation and phenotypic plasticity. Pages 145–174in C. Ohshima, E. Inoue, A. Yuasa and W. Watanabe, eds. Adaptation and evolution. Asakura, Tokyo. 270 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Nagata, Y. and K. Nishiyama. 1976. Remarks on the characteristics of the fins of bitterling,Rhodeus ocellatus ocellatus (Kner) andR. ocellatus smithi (Regan). Mem. Osaka Kyoiku Univ., Ser. III, 25: 17–21.Google Scholar
  9. Nagata, Y. and K. Tatewaki. 1987. Morphological comparison betweenRhodeus ocellatus smithi andR. ocellatus ocellatus. Collecting and breeding, 49:286–290.Google Scholar
  10. Nagata, Y., Y. Kano, H. Kihira, K. Tatewaki, S. Fukuhara, M. Maehata, H. Akiyama, M. Matuda, M. Kuwahara, T. Tetsukawa and E. Kimura. 1988. Study and conservation of Nippon-baratanago,Rhodeus ocellatus smithi in Japan. Pages 1–24in Y. Nagate, ed., Studies and conservation of Nippon-baratanago,Rhodeus ocellatus smithi (Regan). The Society for the Study of Nipponbaratanago.Google Scholar
  11. Nakamura, M. 1955. The transplanted fishes reproducted in Kanto Plain. Bull. Biogeogr. Soc. Japan, (16–19): 333–337.Google Scholar
  12. Nakamura, M. 1969. Cyprinid fishes of Japan. Spec. Publ. Res. Inst. Nat. Resources. (Tokyo), (4). viii+iv+455 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat., 106: 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shaklee, J. B., F. W. Allendorf, D. C. Morizot and G. S. Whitt. 1990. Gene nomenclature for proteincoding loci in fish. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 119: 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ueno, K. 1987. Genetic distance betweenRhodeus ocellatus smithi andR. o. ocellatus. Collecting and breeding, 49: 291–294.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshikazu Nagata
    • 1
  • Tadashi Tetsukawa
    • 2
  • Takanori Kobayashi
    • 3
  • Ken-ichi Numachi
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of BiologyOsaka Kyoiku UniversityKashiwara, OsakaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of EngineeringKansai UniversitySuita, OsakaJapan
  3. 3.Fish Genetics DivisionNational Research Institute of AquacultureMieJapan
  4. 4.Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Marine Science and TechnologyTokai UniversityShimizu, ShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations