Advertisement

Journal of Ethology

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 81–90 | Cite as

The prediapause copulation and its significance in the butterflyEurema hecabe

  • Yoshiomi Kato
Article

Abstract

In the pierid butterflyEurema hecabe, which shows seasonal polymorphism (summer and autumn morphs) and overwinters at adult stage, whether or not the prediapause copulation may be of usual occurrence and reproductively functional was examined. From the counts of the spermatophores carried by the females, it is clear that the prediapause copulation characteristically occurs in reproductively inactive females of the autumn corph. From behavioral observations in the field, mating partners of those females are mostly males of the summer morph rather than from the autumn morph. In autumn, males of the summer morph remained abundant and searched for females on the larval food plants. Furthermore, they mated frequently with autumn morph females. Autumn morph males seemed to be sexually less active or inactive before hibernation. Microscopic examinations of the spermathecae were made in mated autumn-morph females collected before and after hibernation. The results indicate that sperm is passed by the males at autumnal copulation. The sperm may be stored in the female reproductive tract and utilized for fertilization in spring. This supposition is strongly supported by field data; that is, once-mated autumn-morph females laid fertilized eggs in spring. Finally, physiological basis of the prediapause copulation, its adaptive signficance and the behavioral advantage inE. hecabe are discussed from the viewpoint of seasonal adaptation.

Keywords

Microscopic Examination Field Data Food Plant Animal Ecology Adult Stage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aida, S. 1963 Seasonal form of the butterflies and its controlling factors.Seibutsu Kagaku 15: 163–167. (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  2. Beck, S. D. 1986 Insect photoperiodism. (2nd ed.) Academic Press, New York, 387pp.Google Scholar
  3. Boggs, C. L. & L. E. Gilbert 1979 Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: Evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating.Science 206: 83–84.Google Scholar
  4. Boggs, C. L. & W. B. Watt 1981 Population structure of pierid butterflies IV. Genetic and physiological investment in offspring by maleColias.Oecologia 50: 320–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daly, J. M. & D. W. Golding 1977 A description of the spermathecae ofSpirorbis spirorbis (L.) (Polycaeta: Serpulidae) and evidence for a novel mode of sperm transmission.J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. 57: 219–227.Google Scholar
  6. Danilevsky, A. S. 1966 Photoperiodism and seasonal development of insects. Tokyo University Press, Tokyo, 293pp. (Japanese translation)Google Scholar
  7. Denlinger, D. L. 1985 Hormonal control of diapause. In: G. A. Kerkut & L. I. Gilbert (eds.)Comprehensive insect physiology and pharmacology, Vol. 8, Endocrinology II. pp. 353–412. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Endo, K. 1970 Relation between ovarian maturation and activity of the corpora allata in seasonal forms of the butterfly,Polygonia c-aureum L.Develop., Growth and Differ. 11: 297–304.Google Scholar
  9. Endo, K. 1973 Hormonal regulation of mating in the butterfly,Polygonia c-aureum L.Develop., Growth and Differ. 15: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox, W. 1956 Seminal receptacles of snakes.Anat. Rec. 124: 519–540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukuda, H., E. Hama, T. Kuzuya, A. Takahashi, M. Takahashi, B. Tanaka, H. Tanaka, M. Wakabayashi & Y. Watanabe 1982 The life history of butterflies in Japan I. Hoikusha, Osaka, 277pp. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  12. Hidaka, T. & S. Aida 1963 Day length as the main factor of the seasnal form determination inPolygonia c-aureum (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae).Zool. Mag. 72: 77–83. (In Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  13. Kimura, M. T. 1980 Bionomics of Drosophilidae (Diptera) in Hokkaido. IV.Drosophila sexvittata, D. trivittata andD. alboralis.Zool. Mag. 89: 206–209.Google Scholar
  14. Listinger, J. A. & J. W. Apple 1973 Oviposition of the alfalfa weevil in Wisconsin.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 66: 17–20.Google Scholar
  15. Norris, M. J. 1965 Reproduction of the grasshopperAnacridium aegyptium L. in the laboratory.Proc. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 40: 19–29.Google Scholar
  16. Obara, Y. & T. Hidaka 1964 Mating behavior of the Cabbage White,Pieris rapae crucivora I. The ‘flutter response’ of resting male to flying males.Zool. Mag. 73: 131–135. (In Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  17. Ó Foighil, D. 1985 Sperm transfer and storage in brooding bivalveMysella tumida.Biol. Bull. 169: 602–614.Google Scholar
  18. Racey, P. A. 1979 The prolonged storage and survival of spermatozoa in Chiroptera.J. Reprod. Fert. 56: 391–402.Google Scholar
  19. Rutowski, R. L. 1978 The courtship behaviour of the small sulphur butterfly,Eurema lisa (Lepidoptera: Pieridae).Anim. Behav. 26: 892–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rutowski, R. L. 1984 Production and use of secretions passed by males at copulation inPieris protodice (Lepidoptera, Pieridae).Psyche 91: 141–152.Google Scholar
  21. Rutowski, R. L., C. E. Long, L. D. Marshall & R. S. Vetter 1981 Courtship solicitation byColias females (Lepidoptera: Pieridae).Amer. Mid. Natur. 105: 334–340.Google Scholar
  22. Saunders, D. S. 1982 Insect clocks. (2nd ed.) Pergamon Press, Oxford, 409pp.Google Scholar
  23. Shapiro, A. M. 1982 Survival of refrigeratedTatochila butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) as an indicator of male nutrient investment in reproduction.Oecologia 53: 139–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tauber, M. J., C. A. Tauber & S. Masaki 1986 Seasonal Adaptation of Insects. Oxford University Press, New York, 411pp.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, F. 1984 Mexican bean beetles mate successfully in diapause.Int. J. Invert. Reprod. 7: 297–302.Google Scholar
  26. Thornhill, R. & J. Alcock 1983 The evolution of insect mating system. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 574pp.Google Scholar
  27. Yata, O. 1974 Studies on seasonal forms and imaginal diapause in twoEurema species in Japan (Lepidoptera: Pieridae).Tyô to Ga 25: 47–54. (In Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Ethological Society 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshiomi Kato
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyInternational Christian UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations