Journal of Plant Research

, Volume 107, Issue 2, pp 165–175 | Cite as

Morphometric analysis of the genusHemerocallis L. (Liliaceae) in Korea

  • Myong Gi Chung
  • Soon Suk Kang
Original Articles

Abstract

To better understand the patterns of variability and distributions ofHemerocallis in Korea, 53 locations were visited and measurements of 19 morphological and phenological characters were taken on plants directly from their natural habitats. For morphometric analysis, 10 plants from each of 34 populations and five herbarium specimens ofH. middendorffii were used and the data from 12 quantitative characters was analyzed using univariate analysis. Except the littoral populations of Cheju, Hong, Taehuksan, and Sohuksan Islands (H. hongdoensis M. Chung & S. Kang), three peninsular KoreanHemerocallis species can be recognized mainly in South Korea:H. hakuunensis Nakai (=H. micrantha Nakai, growing on southern, central, and northwestern Korea);H. thunbergii Baker (=H. coreana Nakai, found on southeastern and central Korea); andH. middendorffii Tr. et Mey. (central and northeastern Korea). Morphological and phenological features contributing to recognition of the three groups were; color of perianth, shape of roots, shape of inflorescence, flowering time, odor, length of inflorescence, width of the lowest bracts, length of perianth tube enclosing a ovary, width of the inner perianth lobes. Natural hybridization seems to be rare in KoreanHemerocallis. It appears that the KoreanHemerocallis species are relatively well characterized by their distribution patterns, phenology, and habitats compared with the JapaneseHemerocallis species.

Key words

Distribution patterns Habitats Hemerocallis KoreanHemerocallis Morphometric analysis Phenology Population studies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balley, L. 1930.Hemerocallis: the day-lilies. Gentes Herb.2: 143–156.Google Scholar
  2. Bruederlf, L.P., Fairbrothers, D.E. andHanks, S.L. 1989. A systematic circumscription ofCarex mitchelliana (Cyperaceae) with reference to taxonomic status. Amer. J. Bot.76: 124–132.Google Scholar
  3. Chung, M.G., Jones, S.B., Hamrick, J.L. andChung, H.G. 1991. Morphometric and isozyme analysis of the genusHosta (Liliaceae) in Korea. Plant Species Biol.6: 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chung, M.G. and Kang, S.S. 1994.Hemerocallis hongdoensis (Liliaceae), a new species from Korea. Novon4: (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, S. 1986. The well-tinkered daylily. Garden Sept./Oct. 16–19.Google Scholar
  6. Flint, R.F. 1971. Clacial and Quaternary Geology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  7. Fujita, N. 1976. The genusHosta (Liliaceae) in Japan. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.27: 66–96. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Hara, H. 1941. Observations ad plantas Asiae orientalis (XVIII). J. Jap. Bot.17: 127.Google Scholar
  9. Hotta, M., Ito, M. andOkada, I. 1985. Differentiation and species relationships of island populations ofHemerocallis around Kyushu, Japan.In H. Hara, ed., Origin and Evolution of Diversity in Plants and Plant communities, 18–31, Acad. Sci. Book Inc., Tokyo.Google Scholar
  10. Hotta, M. 1986.Hemerocallis aurantiaca group in northern Kyushu, Japan. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.37: 17–21. (in Japasese)Google Scholar
  11. Kawano, S. 1961. On the natural hybrid population ofHemerocallis. Can. J. Bot.39: 667–681.Google Scholar
  12. Kitamura, S., Murata, G. andKoyama, T. 1986. Colored Illustrations of Herbaceous Plants of Japan (Monocotyledoneae). Hoikusha Publ. Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. Lee, T.B. 1985. Illustrated Flora of Korea. Hyangmoonsa, Seoul. (in Korean)Google Scholar
  14. Masuo, M. 1984. Translation: Flowers of Tsushima Island: Flora of Land-bridge Island I. Ashisyobo Co., Ltd., Fukuoka, Japan. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  15. Matsuoka, M. andHotta, M. 1966. Classification ofHemerocallis in Japan and it's vicinity. Acta Phytotax. Geobot.22: 25–43. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  16. Nakai, T. 1932.Hemerocallis Japonica. Bot. Mag. Tokyo46: 111–123.Google Scholar
  17. Nakai, T. 1943. Notulae ad plantas Asiae orientalis (XXVIII). J. Jap. Bot.19: 315–316.Google Scholar
  18. Nakao, S. and Yamashita, K. 1956. Variation in some plant populations.In T. Komai and K. Sakai, eds., Syundan Idengaku (Population Genetics), 249–254, Tokyo. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. Noguchi, J. 1986. Geographical and ecological differentiation in theHemerocallis dumortieri complex with special reference to its karyology. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser B. Div. 2, Bot.20: 29–193.Google Scholar
  20. Ohba H., Ishii, N. and Saito, S. 1987. Translation: Biogeography of Tsushima Island. Report on the natural resource investigation of Tsushima island: Nature of Tsushima Island, Nagasaki Pref., Japan, 259–271. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  21. Ohba, H. and Midorikawa, K. 1987. Translation: Some remarks of the flora of Tsushima Island, NW Kyushu, Japan. Report on the natural resource investigation of Tsushima Island: Nature of Tsushima Island, Nagasaki Pref., Japan, 63–78. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  22. SAS Institute Inc. 1987. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, ver. 6 ed. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  23. Stout, A.B. 1934. Daylilies. Macmillian Co., New York.Google Scholar
  24. Stout, A.B. 1941. Memorandum on a monograph of the genusHemerocallis. Herbertia8: 67–71.Google Scholar
  25. Takenaka, Y. 1952. Karyotypes and sterility inHemerocallis. Coordinating Comm. Res. Genet.3: 71–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Botanical Society of Japan 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myong Gi Chung
    • 1
  • Soon Suk Kang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyGyeongsang National UniversityChinjuThe Republic of Korea

Personalised recommendations