Quantitative description of the process of architecture formation inViburnum dilatatum andV. wrightii (Caprifoliaceae)
- 36 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
Process of architecture formation was comparatively analyzed usingViburnum dilatatum andV. wrightii (Caprifoliaceae). In both species, orthotropic primary axes emerge from the basal parts of mother plants near the ground level. The primary axes grow vigorously in the first and the subsequent few years of their development. Later on, they decrease their elongation rates gradually and many axillary buds stay in dormancy. A few of the axillary buds emerge after several years' dormancy and elongate vigorously forming orthotropic secondary axes. inViburnum dilatatum, nearly 50% of the primary axes develop the secondary axes. The secondary axes elongate as vigorous as the primary axes. Furthermore, more than 20% of the secondary axes form the tertiary axes, and only 10% of the tertiary axes form the quarternary axes. In contrast, inViburnum wrightii only less than 25% of the primary axes form the secondary axes, and there is no tertiary or quarternary axis. The secondary axes of this species elongate less vigorously than the primary axes. As the result of those differences in the axis formation,Viburnum wrightii forms a simpler architecture thanV. dilatatum.
Key words
Architecture Axis Caprifoliaceae ViburnumPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Borchert, R. andHonda, H. 1984. Control of development in the bifurcating branch system ofTabebuia rosea: a computer simulation. Bot. Gaz.145: 184–195.Google Scholar
- Borchert, R. andTomlinson, P.B. 1984. Architecture and crown geometry inTabebuia rosea (Bignoniaceae). Amer. J. Bot.71: 958–969.Google Scholar
- Edelin, C. 1991. Nouvelles donnees sur l'architecture des arbres sympodiaux: le concept de plan d'organisation.In C. Edelin, ed., L'arbre-Biologie et Development, Naturalia Monspeliensia 1991, suppl. ser. A7, Université Montpellier II, Montpellier, pp. 127–154.Google Scholar
- Ewers, F.W. andZimmermann, M.H. 1984. The hydraulic architecture of eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis). Can. J. Bot.62: 940–946.Google Scholar
- Fisher, J.B. andWeeks, C.L. 1985. Tree architecture ofNeea (Nyctaginaceae): Geometry and simulation of branches and the presence of two different models. Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat. Sect. B, Adansonia Bot. Phytochim., ser. 4,7: 385–401.Google Scholar
- Hallé, F., Oldeman, R.A.A. andTomlinson, P.B. 1978. Tropical Trees and Forests: an Architectural Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Hibbs, D.E. 1981. Leader growth and the architecture of three North American hemlocks. Can. J. Bot.59: 476–480.Google Scholar
- Kramer, P.J. andKozlowski, T.T. 1979. Physiology of Woody Plants. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
- Osumi, S. andIshikawa, Y. 1983. Applicability of the RICHARDS' growth function to analysis of growth of tree. Sci. Rep. Kyoto Pref. Univ. Agri.35: 49–76 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
- Remphrey, W.R., Steeves, T.A. andNeal, B.R. 1983. The morphology and growth ofArctostaphylos uva-ursi (bearberry): an architectural analysis. Can. J. Bot.61: 2430–2450.Google Scholar
- Stevens, W.L. 1951. Asymptotic regression. Biometrics7: 247–267.Google Scholar
- Yoda, K. andSuzuki, M. 1993. Quantitative analysis of major axis development inViburnum dilatatum andV. wrightii (Caprifoliaceae). J. Plant Res.106: 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar