Advertisement

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 675–686 | Cite as

Touch-screen system for assessing visuo-motor exploratory skills in neuropsychological disorders of spatial cognition

  • M. Rabuffetti
  • M. Ferrarin
  • R. Spadone
  • D. Pellegatta
  • V. Gentileschi
  • G. Vallar
  • A. Pedotti
Article

Abstract

A new computerised test adopting touch-screen technology has been developed to assess the visuo-motor exploration of extra-personal space. The test was derived from well-known paper-and-pencil cancellation tasks used widely in the diagnosis and quantitative assessment of unilateral spatial neglect (USN), a neuropsychological syndrome that is more frequent and severe after damage to the right cerebral hemisphere. A main component deficit of USN is the defective visuo-motor exploration of the side of space contralateral to the side of the lesion (contralesional), namely, in right-sided brain-damaged patients it occurs on the left side and vice versa. The computer-based paradigm consisted of a visuo-motor spatial exploratory task: the subjects were instructed to touch, in any order they wished, all the targets they detected on a computer touch-screen. This measured the time of occurrence and the spatial co-ordinates of each touch event and forwarded the data to the computer for storage; the computer provided feedback to the subject by ‘tagging’ the touched target. The paradigm allowed the calculation of accuracy and latency indexes and recorded the exploratory pathway taken by each subject. A pilot study was performed in ten normal subjects and 15 brain-damaged patients, with and without psychometric evidence of USN; the results showed that the equipment was able to provide quantitative indexes related to the spatial-temporal aspects of exploratory ability, which are useful for diagnostic purposes, and revealed significant differences between the controls and patients with USN: the overall average values of latency and crossing indexes increased in patients with USN, compared with the controls (latency from 0.77 to 1.90 s; path crossing index from 7.0% to 59.5%), and the significantly negative USN patient latency gradient (−2.79 against a null control value) evidenced a worsening of performance towards the left side.

Keywords

Vision Extra-personal space Unilateral spatial neglect Brain damage Neuropsychology Rehabilitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abello, G., Cincera, M., Rabuffetti, M., Da Pieve, V., Pedotti, A., andCardini, R. (1995): ‘A new approach for automatic evaluation of spatial neglecting’, Proceedings RESNA 1995, June 9–14, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, M. L. (1973): ‘A simple test of visual neglect’,Neurology,23, pp. 658–664Google Scholar
  3. Anton, H. A., Hershler, C., Lloyd, P., andMurray, D. (1988): ‘Visual neglect and extinction: a new test’,Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.,69, pp. 1013–1016Google Scholar
  4. Axenfeld, D. (1894): ‘Eine einfache methode hemianopsie zu constatiren’,Neurologisches Centralblatt, pp. 437–438Google Scholar
  5. Bisiach, E., Capitani, E., andPorta, E. (1985): ‘Two basic properties of space representation in the brain: Evidence from unilateral neglect’,J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych.,48, pp. 141–144Google Scholar
  6. Bisiach, E., Cappa, S. F., andVallar, G. (1983): ‘Guida all'esame neuropsicologico’ (Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 1983)Google Scholar
  7. Bisiach, E., Luzzatti, C., andPerani, D. (1979): ‘Unilateral neglect, representational schema and consciousness’,Brain,102, 609–618Google Scholar
  8. Bisiach, E., andVallar, G. (2000): ‘Unilateral neglect in humans’ inBoller, F., Grafman, J., andRizzolatti, G. (Eds): ‘Handbook of neuropsychology, 2nd edn, vol. 1’ (Elsevier Science, B.V., Amsterdam, 2000), pp. 459–502Google Scholar
  9. Bisiach, E., Vallar, G., Perani, D., Papagno, C., andBerti, A. (1986): ‘Unawareness of disease following lesions of the right hemisphere: anosognosia for hemiplegia and anosognosia for hemianopia’,Neuropsychologia,24, pp. 471–482Google Scholar
  10. Butcher, J. N., Perry, J. N., andAtlis, M. M. (2000): ‘Validity and utility of computer-based test interpretation’,Psychol. Assess.,12, pp. 6–18Google Scholar
  11. Crook, T. H., Youngjohn, J. R., andLarrabee, G. J. (1990): ‘The misplaced objects test: a measure of everyday visual memory’,J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsyc.,12, pp. 819–833Google Scholar
  12. Curtis-Prior, P. B. (1996): ‘Computerized methods of neuropsychological assessment’,Br. J. Hosp. Med.,56, pp. 445–449Google Scholar
  13. De Renzi, E., Faglioni, P., andScotti, G. (1970): ‘Hemispheric contribution to exploration of space through the visual and tactile modality’,Cortex,6, pp. 191–203Google Scholar
  14. Diller, L., andWeinberg, J. (1977): ‘Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation. The evolution of a rational remediation program’ inWeinstein, E. A., andFriedland, R. P. (Eds): ‘Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization’ (Raven Press, New York, 1977), pp. 62–82Google Scholar
  15. Donnelly, N., Guest, R., Fairhurst, M., Potter, J., Deighton, A., andPatel, M. (1999): ‘Developing algorithms to enhance the sensitivity of cancellation tests of visuospatial neglect’,Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput.,31, pp. 668–673Google Scholar
  16. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., andMcHugh, P. R. (1975): ‘Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician’,J. Psychiatr. Res.,12, pp. 189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauthier, L., Dehaut, F., andJoanette, Y. (1989): ‘The bells test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect’,Int. J. Clin. Neuropsychol.,11, pp. 49–54Google Scholar
  18. Halligan, P. W., Burn, J. P., Marshall, J. C., andWade, D. T. (1992): ‘Visuo-spatial neglect: qualitative differences and laterality of cerebral lesion’,J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat.,55, pp. 1060–1068Google Scholar
  19. Heilman, K. M., andValenstein, E. (1979): ‘Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect’,Ann. Neurol.,5, pp. 166–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., andValenstein, E. (1993): ‘Neglect and related disorders’ inHeilman, K. M., andValenstein, E. (Eds): ‘Clinical neuropsychology, 3rd edn’ (Oxford University Press, New York, 1993), pp. 279–336Google Scholar
  21. Huguenin, N. H. (1997): ‘Employing computer technology to assess visual attention in young children and adolescents with severe mental retardation’,J. Exp. Child Psychol.,65, pp. 141–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishiai, S., Furukawa, T., andTsukagoshi, H. (1989): ‘Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect’,Brain,112, pp. 1485–1502Google Scholar
  23. Jouffrais, C., andBoussaoud, D. (1999): ‘Neuronal activity related to eye-hand coordination, in the primate premotor cortex’,Exp. Brain Res.,128, pp. 205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kane, R. L., andKay, G. G. (1992): ‘Computerized assessment in neuropsychology: a review of tests and test batteries’,Neuropsychol. Rev.,3, pp. 1–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mark, V. W., Kooistra, C. A., andHeilman, K. M. (1988): ‘Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglected stimuli’,Neurology,38, pp. 1207–1211Google Scholar
  26. Massironi, M., Antonucci, G., Pizzamiglio, L., Vitale, M. V., andZoccolotti, P. L. (1988): ‘The Wundt-Jastrow illusion in the study of spatial hemi-inattention’,Neuropsychologia,26, pp. 161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Measso, G., Cavarzeran, F., Zappalà, G.,Lebowitz, B. D., Crook, T. H., Pirozzolo, F. J., Amaducci, L. A., Massari, D., andGrigoletto, F. (1993): ‘The mini-mental state examination: normative study of an Italian random sample’,Develop. Neuropsychol.,9, pp. 77–85Google Scholar
  28. Mendez, M. F., Cherrier, M. M., andCymerman, J. S. (1997): ‘Hemispatial neglect on visual search tasks in Alzheimer's disease’,Neuropsy. Neuropsy. Be.,10, pp. 203–208Google Scholar
  29. Mesulam, M.-M. (1985): ‘Principles of behavioral neurology’ (F.A. Davis, Philadelphia, 1985)Google Scholar
  30. Na, D. L., Adair, J. C., Kang, Y., Chung, C. S., Lee, K. H., andHeilman, K. M. (1999): ‘Motor perseverative behavior on a line cancellation task’,Neurology,52, pp. 1569–1576Google Scholar
  31. Oldfield, R. C. (1971): ‘The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory’Neuropsychologia,9, pp. 97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Potter, J., Deighton, T., Patel, M., Fairhurst, M., Guest, R., andDonnelly, N. (2000): ‘Computer recording of standard tests of visual neglect in stroke patients’,Clin. Rehabil.,14, pp. 441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robbins, T. W., James, M., Owen A. M., Sahakian, B. J., McInnes, L., andRabbitt, P. (1994): ‘Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): a factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers’,Dementia,5, pp. 266–281Google Scholar
  34. Siegel, S., andCastellan, N. J. (1988): ‘Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn’ (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988)Google Scholar
  35. Stone, S. P., Wilson, B., Wroot, A., Halligan, P. W., Lange, L. S., Marshall, J. C., andGreenwood, R. J. (1991): ‘The assessment of visuo-spatial neglect, after acute stroke’,J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psych.,54, pp. 345–350Google Scholar
  36. Vallar, G. (1998): ‘Spatial hemineglect in humans’,Trends Cognit. Sci.,2, pp. 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vallar, G., Daini, R., andAntonucci, G. (2000): ‘Processing of illusion of length in spatial hemineglect. A study of line bisection’,Neuropsychologia,38, pp. 1087–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vallar, G., Rusconi, M. L., Fontana, S., andMusicco, M. (1994): ‘Tre test di esplorazione visuo-spaziale: taratura su 212 soggetti normali’,Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria,55, pp. 827–841Google Scholar
  39. Vallar, G., Rusconi, M. L., Geminiani, G., Berti, A., andCappa, S. F. (1991): ‘Visual and nonvisual neglect after unilateral brain lesions: modulation by visual input’,Int. J. Neurosci.,61, pp. 229–239Google Scholar
  40. Venneri, A., Pentore, R., Cotticelli, B., andDella Sala, S. (1998): ‘Unilateral spatial neglect in the late stage of Alzheimer's disease’,Cortex,34, pp. 743–752Google Scholar
  41. Wilson, B., Cockburn, J., andHalligan, P. W. (1987): ‘Behavioural inattention test’ (Thames Valley Test Company, Titchfield, Hampshire, UK, 1987)Google Scholar
  42. Zoccoloti, P., Antonucci, G., Judica, A., Montenero, P., Pizzamiglio, L., andRazzano, C. (1989): ‘Incidence and evolution of the hemi-neglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain-damage’,Int. J. Neurosci.,47, pp. 209–216Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFMBE 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Rabuffetti
    • 1
  • M. Ferrarin
    • 1
  • R. Spadone
    • 1
  • D. Pellegatta
    • 2
  • V. Gentileschi
    • 3
  • G. Vallar
    • 3
  • A. Pedotti
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Centro di Bioingegneria, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi IRCCS MilanoPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Unità Operativa Rieducazione FunzionaleFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi IRCCS MilanoMilanoItaly
  3. 3.Dipartimento di PsicologiaUniversità degli Studi Milano BicoccaMilanoItaly
  4. 4.Dipartimento di BioingegneriaPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations