Journal of Economics

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 149–165 | Cite as

On the incentives to provide fuel-efficient automobiles

  • Hans Degryse
  • Andreas Irmen
Articles
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

We argue that the provision of more fuel-efficient cars necessitates specific aerodynamic shapes. We show that the presence of this technological constraint may reduce the incentives to provide fuel efficiency. In equilibrium, cars become more similar and aerodynamic as fuel prices increase. However, the provided level of fuel efficiency falls short of the social optimal one such that a fuel-economy standard is welfare-enhancing.

Keywords

fuel-efficient automobiles attributes product differentiation 

JEL classification

D43 L15 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansari, A., Economides, N., and Steckel, J. (1998): “The Max-Min Principle of Product Differentiation.”Journal of Regional Science 38: 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. d'Aspremont, C., Gabszewicz, J. J., and Thisse, J.-F. (1979): “On Hotelling's ‘Stability in Competition’.”Econometrica 47: 145–1150.Google Scholar
  3. Blick durch die Wirtschaft (1996, February 26): “Das kraftstoffarme Automobil kann kein billiges Fahrzeug werden” (by Jochen Seyboth).Google Scholar
  4. Canoy, M., and Peitz, M. (1997): “The Differentiation Triangle.”Journal of Industrial Economics 45: 305–328.Google Scholar
  5. Degryse, H. (1996): “On the Interaction between Horizontal and Vertical Product Differentiation: an Application to Banking.”Journal of Industrial Economics 44: 169–186.Google Scholar
  6. Degryse, H., and Irmen, A. (1997): “Attribute Dependence and the Provision of Quality.”Regional Science and Urban Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  7. Economides, N. (1989): “Quality Variations and Maximal Variety Variation.”Regional Science and Urban Economics 19: 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. — (1993): “Quality Variations in the Circular Model of Variety-Differentiated Products.”Regional Science and Urban Economics 23: 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirlé, L., Lerch, C., and Matt, M. (1990): “Un modèle de concurrence mixte et son extension.” Master thesis, Department of Economics, Université Louis Pasteur de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.Google Scholar
  10. Irmen, A., and Thisse, J.-F. (1998): “Competition in Multi-characteristics Spaces: Hotelling Was Almost Right.”Journal of Economic Theory 78: 76–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Le Journal de Genève (1996, August 8): “Trois litres au cent. Greenpeace présente sa Twingo écolo.”Google Scholar
  12. National Research Council (1992):Automotive Fuel Economy: How Far Should We Go? Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Neven, D., and Thisse, J.-F. (1990): “On Quality and Variety Competition.” InEconomic Decision Making: Games, Econometrics, and Optimization: Contributions in the Honour of Jacques H. Drèze, edited by J. J. Gabszewicz, J.-F. Richard, and L. Wolsey, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  14. Tabuchi, T. (1994): “Two-Stage Two-Dimensional Spatial Competition between Two Firms.”Regional Science and Urban Economics 24: 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vandenbosch, M. B., and Weinberg, C. B. (1995): “Product and Price Competition in Two-Dimensional Vertical Differentiation Model.”Marketing Science 14: 224–249.Google Scholar
  16. Wirtschaftswoche (1995, September 5): “Säuft nicht, läuft nicht” (by Franz W. Rother).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Degryse
    • 1
  • Andreas Irmen
    • 2
  1. 1.K. U. Leuven and Tilburg UniversityLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Economics A5University of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations