A randomized trial on the treatment of the first epileptic seizure scientific background, rationale, study design and protocol
- 56 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
Observational studies suggest that the sooner treatment is started after the onset of seizures the better is the outcome of the disease. However, when to start antiepileptic treatment is still debated and this may explain the different behaviour of practising physicians. For these reasons, a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the treatment of the first seizure and the treatment of the recurrences (the two most common strategies in clinical practice) has been started in Italy. The scientific background, the study rationale and design, and the general characteristics of the study population (498 patients) are presented here.
Key Words
Seizures Epilepsy Anticonvulsants Clinical trials PrognosisSommario
I risultati di studi osservazionali indicano che quanto più precoce è il trattamento delle crisi epilettiche tanto migliore è la prognosi della malattia. Comunque, è tuttora discusso quando iniziare il trattamento. Ciò tende a giustificare la variabilità degli approcci terapeutici attuati nella pratica clinica corrente. Per tali motivi, è stato intrapreso in Italia uno studio clinico controllato multicentrico volto a comparare le due modalità terapeutiche più comuni, cioè l'inizio del trattamento dopo la prima crisi epilettica ed il trattamento solo dopo una ricorrenza delle crisi. Nel presente articolo sono illustrati i principali dati bibliografici di riferimento, il razionale ed il disegno dello studio, e le caratteristiche principali della popolazione in esame (498 casi).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Annegers J.F., Hauser W.A., Elveback L.R.:Remission of seizures and relapse in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 20:729–737, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [2]Annegers J.F., Shirts S.B., Hauser W.A., Kurland L.T.:Risk of recurrence after an initial unprovoked seizure. Epilepsia 27:43–50, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [3]Beghi E., Viani F., Avanzini G., Canger R.:Current practice and opinions on pharmacological treatment of epilepsies: a mail interview of a sample of italian physicians. Boll. Lega It. Epil. 57:27–32, 1987.Google Scholar
- [4]Berg A.T., Shinnar S.:The risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure: a quantitative review. Neurology 41:965–972, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [5]Camfield P.R., Camfield C.S., Smith E.C., Tibbles J.A.R.:Newly treated childhood epilepsy: a prospective study of recurrences and side effects. Neurology 35:722–725, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [6]Camfield P.R., Camfield C.S., Dooley J.M., et al.:Epilepsy after a first unprovoked seizure in childhood. Neurology 35:1657–1660, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [7]Collaborative Group for the study of epilepsy:Prognosis of epilepsy in newly referred patients: a multicenter prospective study of the effects of monotherapy on the long-term course of epilepsy. Epilepsia 33:45–51, 1992.Google Scholar
- [8]Commission on classification and terminology of the international league against epilepsy:Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia 22:489–501, 1981.Google Scholar
- [9]Commission on classification and terminology of the international league against epilepsy.Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Epilepsia 30:389–399, 1989.Google Scholar
- [10]Cox D.R.:Regression models and life tables. J. R. Statist. Soc. B. 34:187–220, 1972.Google Scholar
- [11]De Silva M., McArdle B., McGowan M., Reynolds E.H., Neville B., Johnson A.L.:Monotherapy for newly diagnosed childhood epilepsy: a comparative trial and prognostic evaluation. Epilepsia 30:662, 1989.Google Scholar
- [12]Elwes R.D.C., Johnson A.L., Shorvon S.D., Reynolds E.H.:The prognosis for seizure control in newly diagnosed epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 311:944–947, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [13]Elwes R.D.C., Chesterman P., Reynolds E.H.:Prognosis after a first untreated tonic-clonic seizure. Lancet ii:752–753, 1985.Google Scholar
- [14]Emerson R., D'Souza B.J., Vining E., et al.:Stopping medication in children with epilepsy. Predictors of outcome. N. Engl. J. Med. 304:1125–1129, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [15]Goodridge D.M.G., Shorvon S.D.:Epileptic seizures in a population of 6000. II: treatment and prognosis. Br. Med. J. 287:645–647, 1983.Google Scholar
- [16]Hart R.G., Eaton J.D.:Seizure recurrence after a first, unprovoked seizure. Arch. Neurol. 43:1289–1290, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [17]Hart Y.M., Sander J.W.A.S., Johnson A.L., Shorvon S.D. for the NGPSE:National General Practice Study of Epilepsy: recurrence after a first seizure. Lancet 336:1271–1274, 1990.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- [18]Hauser W.A., Anderson V.E., Lowenson R.B., McRoberts S.M.:Seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked seizure. N. Engl. J. Med. 307:522–528, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [19]Hauser W.A.:Should people be treated after a first seizure. Arch. Neurol. 43:1287–1288, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [20]Hauser W.A., Rich S.S., Annegers J.F., Anderson V.E.:Seizure recurrence after a 1st unprovoked seizure: An extended follow-up. Neurology 40:1163–1170, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [21]Heller A.J., Chesterman P., Elwes R.D.C., Reynolds E.H., Crawford P., Chadwick D., Johnson A.L.:Monotherapy for newly diagnosed adult epilepsy: a comparative trial and prognostic evaluation. Epilepsia 30:648, 1989.Google Scholar
- [22]Hirtz D.G., Ellenberg J.H., Nelson K.B.:The risk of recurrence of nonfibrile seizures in children. Neurology 34:637–641, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [23]Holowach J., Thurston D.L. O'Leary J.:Prognosis in childhood epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 286:169–174, 1972.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [24]Hopkins A., Garman A., Clarke C.:The first seizure in adult life. Lancet i:721–726, 1988.Google Scholar
- [25]Kaplan E.L., Meier P.:Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Statist. Ass. 53:457–481, 1958.Google Scholar
- [26]Mattson R.H., Cramer J.A., Collins J.F., et al.:Comparison of carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and primidone in partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures. N. Engl. J. Med. 313:145–151, 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [27]Okuma T., Kumashiro H.:Natural history and prognosis of epilepsy: report of a multi-institutional study in Japan. Epilepsia 22:35–53, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [28]Reidenberg M.M., Lowenthal D.T.:Adverse non drug reactions. N. Engl. J. Med. 279:678–679, 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [29]Reynolds E.H.:The process of epilepsy: Is kindling relevant? In: Boldwing T., Trimble M.R., (Eds.), The Clinical Relevance of Kindling. Chichester, J. Wiley & Sons, 149–160, 1989.Google Scholar
- [30]Shinnar S., Berg A.T., Moshé S.L. et al.:Risk of seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure in childhood: A prospective study. Pediatrics 85:1076–1085, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [31]Shorvon S.D., Reynolds E.H.:Early prognosis of epilepsy. Br. Med. J. 285:1699–1701, 1982.Google Scholar
- [32]Søfijanov N.G.:Clinical evolution and prognosis of childhood epilepsies. Epilepsia 23:61–69, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- [33]Viani F., Musicco M., Romeo A., et al.:Prognosis of epilepsy in children: remission rates in newly diagnosed and newly treated patients. Boll. Lega It. Epil. 54/55:331–332, 1986.Google Scholar