Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 269–289 | Cite as

Women's strategies for survival: Developing agency in abusive relationships

  • Lora Bex Lempert
Article

Abstract

The simultaneity of love and violence in the lived experiences of abused women forms the context within which these women construct meaning and develop agency. Utilizing grounded theory methodology (Glaser, 1978; Glaser and Strauss, 1967; Strauss, 1987; Strauss and Corbin, 1990), this paper explicates these agentic processes by analyzing the strategies employed by 32 abused women, publically and privately, to mitigate the violence and its effects. By highlighting the contradictory duality in these relationships, the processes by which abused women strategize and develop agency to halt, change, and/or cope with the violence becomes analytically salient.

Key Words

abuse agency battering domestic violence wife abuse violence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, C. M., and Straus, M. A. (1980). Resources, power and husband-wife violence. In Hotaling, M. A., and Hotaling, G. T. (eds.),The Social Cases of Husband-Wife Violence, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 68–81.Google Scholar
  2. Alford, R. (1976).Health Care Politics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard, J. (1975).Women, Wives, Mothers: Values and Options, Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Chang, D. B. K. (1989). An abused spouse's self-saving process: A theory of identity transformation.Sociological Perspect. 32: 535–550.Google Scholar
  5. Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In Emerson, R. M. (ed.),Contemporary Field Research, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, pp. 109–126.Google Scholar
  6. Cho, J. (1991). Ressentiment of the battered wives: The case of Korea.Studies in Symbol. Interact. 12: 149–181.Google Scholar
  7. Denzin, N. K. (1989).Interpretive Interactionism, Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  8. Denzin, N. K. (1984). Toward a phenomenology of domestic, family violence.Am. J. Sociol. 90: 483–513.Google Scholar
  9. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1979).Violence Against Wives, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1981). Community response to violence against wives: Charivari, abstract justice and patriarchy.Social Probl. 28: 563–581.Google Scholar
  11. Dobash, R. E., and Dobash, R. P. (1992).Women, Violence and Social Change, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  12. Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., Cavanagh, C., and Wilson, M. (1978). Wife beating: The victims speak.Victimology, 2: 608–622.Google Scholar
  13. DuBois, B. (1983). Passionate scholarship: Notes on values, knowing, and method in feminist social science. In Bowles, B., and Klein, R. D. (eds.),Theories of women's studies, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and New York, pp. 105–116.Google Scholar
  14. Estes, C. (1981). The social construction of reality: A framework for inquiry.The Aging Enterprise, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  15. Ferraro, K. J. (1979). Physical and emotional battering: Aspects of managing hurt.Calif. Sociologist, 2: 134–149.Google Scholar
  16. Ferraro, K. J. (1987). Negotiating trouble in a battered women's shelter. In Deegan, M. J., and Hill, M. R. (eds.).Women and symbolic interaction, Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 379–394.Google Scholar
  17. Ferraro, K. J., and Johnson, J. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization.Social Probl. 30: 325–339.Google Scholar
  18. Gelles, R. J., and Straus, M. A. (1979). Violence in the American family.J. Social Issues 35: 15–39.Google Scholar
  19. Giles-Sims, J. (1983).Wife Battering: A Systems Theory Approach. The Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, B. G. (1978).Theoretical Sensitivity, The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967).The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Goffman, E. (1971).Relations in Public, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Gross, H. E. (1987). Couples who live apart: Time/Place disjunctions and their consequences. In Deegan, M. J., and Hill, M. (eds).Women and Symbolic Interaction, Allen & Unwin, Inc., Boston, pp. 211–228.Google Scholar
  24. Hanmer, J., and Maynard, M. (1987).Women, Violence and Social Control, Humanities Press International, Atlantic Highlands.Google Scholar
  25. Hickey, M. C. (1990). The double life of the battered wife.Working Mother 13: 38–44.Google Scholar
  26. Keller, E. F. (1985).Reflections on Gender and Science, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  27. Kelly, L. (1988). How women define their experiences of violence. In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.).Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp. 114–132.Google Scholar
  28. Kurz, D. (1989). Social science perspectives on wife abuse: Current debates and future directions.Gender Soc. 3: 489–505.Google Scholar
  29. Lasch, C. (1978).Haven in a Heartless World, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Lempert, L. B. (1992).The crucible: violence, help-seeking, and abused women's transformations of self, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of California, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  31. Lempert, L. B. (1995). The line in the sand: Definitional dialogues in abusive relationships.Studies Symbol. Interact. 18.Google Scholar
  32. Loseke, D. R. (1987). Lived realities and the construction of social problems: The case of wife abuse.Symbol. Interact. 10: 229–243.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, D. (1976).Battered Wives, Pocket Books, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Mead, G. H. (1934).Mind, Self, and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  35. Mills, T. (1985). The assault on the self: Stages in coping with battering husbands.Qualitative Sociology 8: 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mintz, S., and Kellogg, S. (1988).Domestic Revolutions: A Social History of American Family Life, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Pagelow, M. D. (1981).Woman-Battering: Victims and Their Experiences, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  38. Pagelow, M. D. (1984).Family Violence, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Radford, J. (1987). Legalising woman abuse. In Hanmer, J., and Maynard, M. (eds).Women, Violence and Social Control, Humanities Press International, Atlantic Highlands, pp. 135–151.Google Scholar
  40. Rubin, L. (1983).Intimate Strangers, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Sheffield, C. J. (1989). The invisible intruder: women's experiences of obscence phone calls.Gender Society, 3: 483–488.Google Scholar
  42. Skolnick, A. S., and Skolnick, J. H. (1992).Family in Transition (7th edition), Harper Collins Publishers, New York, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  43. Straus, M. A. (1987). A sociological perspective on the prevention and treatment of wife beating. In Roy, M. (ed.),Battered Women, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. (1980).Behind Closed Doors, Doubleday, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
  45. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys.J. Marr. Fam. 48: 465–479.Google Scholar
  46. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of Qualitative Research, Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  47. Strauss, A. L. (1987).Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Valentine, C. G. (1990). Appearance, norms, gender's body and the social control of women. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, D.C., August 1990.Google Scholar
  49. Walker, L. E. (1979).The Battered Woman, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Walker, L. E. (1989).Terrifying Love, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lora Bex Lempert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral SciencesThe University of Michigan-DearbornDearborn

Personalised recommendations