Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 3–4, pp 329–335 | Cite as

Numerical modelling of suspended sediment transport in tidal estuaries: A comparison between the Tagus (Portugal) and the Scheldt (Belgium-the Netherlands)

  • Luis Ivens Portela
  • Ramiro Neves


A numerical model to simulate the transport of suspended sediment in tidal estuaries is presented. The model is applied to the two large European estuaries the Tagus (Portugal) and the Scheldt (Belgium-The Netherlands). Calculated suspended sediment concentrations compare favourably with observations in the Tagus (r=0.84) and in the Scheldt (r=0.73). The parametrization scheme indicates that the bottom content of fine sediment is correlated with depth in the Tagus; but a different relationship is used in the Scheldt. Because of tidal range differences, average suspended sediment concentrations are lower in the Tagus (80 mg l−1) than in the Scheldt (130 mg l−1), but a larger relative variation between spring and neap tide concentrations may occur in the Tagus.


Suspended sediment model estuary Tagus Scheldt 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ALLEN, G.P., J.C. SALOMON, P. BASSOULLET, Y. DU PENHOAT and C. DE GRANDPRÉ, 1980. Effects of tides on mixing and suspended sediment transport in macrotidal estuaries. Sediment. Geol., 26: 69–90.Google Scholar
  2. CANCINO, L. and R. NEVES, 1994. 3D-numerical modelling of turbidity maximum zone dynamics in the Scheldt estuary. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol. 28: 337–345.Google Scholar
  3. CASTANHEIRO, J. 1985. Suspended matter in the Tejo estuary. Distribution and variability. Environmental Study of the Tejo Estuary, Direcç≈ao-Geral da Qualidade do Ambiente, Lisbon p. 1–29. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  4. CASTANHEIRO, J. and J. CRESPO, 1983. Sediment dynamics. Results from the observations made in 1981. Environmental Study of the Tejo Estuary, Report No. 31. Comiss≈ao Nacional do Ambiente, Lisbon, p. 1–65. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  5. DRONKERS, J., 1986. Tide-induced residual transport of fine sediment. In: J. van de Kreeke, Ed., Physics of Shallow Estuaries and Bays. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 228–244.Google Scholar
  6. ELLIOTT, M. and J.-P. DUCROTOY, 1991. The future direction of studies on spatial and temporal comparisons of coasts and estuaries. In: M. Elliott and J.-P. Ducrotoy, Eds., Estuaries and coasts: spatial and temporal intercomparisons. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, p. 385–390.Google Scholar
  7. GAUDÉNCIO, M.J., M.T. GUERRA and M. GLÉMAREC, 1991. Recherches biosédimentaires sur la zone maritime de l'estuaire du Tage, Portugal: données sédimentaires préliminaires. In: M. Elliott and J.-P. Ducrotoy, Eds. Estuaries and coasts: spatial and temporal intercomparisons. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, p. 11–16.Google Scholar
  8. GIBBS, R.J., D.M. TSHUDY, L. KONWAR and J.-M. MARTIN, 1989. Coagulation and transport of sediments in the Gironde Estuary. Sedimentology, 36: 987–999.Google Scholar
  9. KRONE, R.B., 1962. Flume studies of the transport of sediment in estuarial shoaling processes. Hydraulic Engineering Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, p. 1–118.Google Scholar
  10. LANG, G., R. SCHUBERT, M. MARKOFSKY, H.-U. FANGER, I. GRABEMANN, H.L. KRASEMANN, L.J.R. NEUMANN and R. RIETHMÜLLER, 1989. Data interpretation and numerical modeling of the Mud and Suspended Sediment Experiment 1985. J. Geophys. Res., 94: 14381–14393.Google Scholar
  11. MARTINS, M. and M.J.L. DUFFNER, 1982. Water quality study. Results from synoptic observations in 1980. Environmental Study of the Tejo Estuary, Report No. 14, Comiss≈ao Nacional do Ambiente. Lisbon, p. 1–212 (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  12. MEHTA, A.J., 1989. Laboratory studies on cohesive sediment deposition and erosion. In: J. Dronkers and W. van Leussen, Eds., Physical processes in estuaries, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 427–445.Google Scholar
  13. MEHTA, A.J., E.J. HAYTER, W.R. PARKER, R.B. KRONE and A.M. TEETER, 1989. Cohesive sediment transport. I: Process description. J. Hydraul. Engin. (ASCE), 115: 1076–1093.Google Scholar
  14. MULDER, H.P.J. and C. UDINK, 1991. Modelling of cohesive sediment transport. A case study: the Western Scheldt Estuary. In: B.L. Edge, Ed., Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Coastal Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, p. 3012–3023.Google Scholar
  15. NIHOUL, J.C.J., F.C. RONDAY, J.J. PETERS and A. STERLING, 1978. Hydrodynamics of the Scheldt estuary. In: J.C.J. Nihoul, Ed., Hydrodynamics of estuaries and fjords. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 27–53.Google Scholar
  16. OLIVEIRA, R., 1967. Contribution to the study of the Tejo estuary. Sedimentology. LNEC Technical Paper No. 296, Laboratório Nacional de Engeharia Civil, Lisbon, p. 1–61. (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  17. PARTHENIADES, E., 1965. Erosion and deposition of cohesive solid. J. Hydraul. Div. (ASCE), 91: 105–139.Google Scholar
  18. PORTELA, L.I., L. CANCINO and R. NEVES, 1992. Modelling of tidal flow and transport processes: a case study in the Tejo estuary. In: P.W. Partridge, Ed., Computer modelling of seas and coastal region. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, p. 449–461.Google Scholar
  19. PORTELA, L.I. and R. NEVES, 1993. Modelling of salt distribution in the Tejo estuary using the QUICK Scheme. In: L.C. Wrobel and C.A. Brebbia, Eds., Water Pollution II: modelling, measuring and prediction. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, p. 121–128.Google Scholar
  20. SALOMONS, W. and W.D. EYSINK, 1981. Pathways of mud and particulate metals from rivers to the Southern North Sea. In: W. Salomons, W.G. Mook and W.D. Eysink, Eds., Biogeochemical and hydrodynamic processes affecting heavy metals in rivers, lakes and estuaries. Delft Hydraulics Publ. No. 253, Delft, p. 1–34.Google Scholar
  21. VALE, C. and B. SDBY, 1987. Suspended sediment fluctuations in the Tagus estuary on semi-diurnal and fortnightly time scales. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 25: 495–508.Google Scholar
  22. VALE, C., M.J. GAUDÊNCIO and M.T. GUERRA, 1989. Evaluation of the ecological impact. In: C. Alzieu and B. Gallene, Eds., Proceedings of the International Seminar on the Environmental Aspects of Dredging Activities. Nantes, p. 119–128.Google Scholar
  23. VAN ECK, G.T.M. and N.M. DE ROOIJ, 1990. Development of a water quality and bio-accumulation model for the Scheldt estuary. In: W. Michaelis, Ed., Estuarine water quality management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 95–104.Google Scholar
  24. VAN LEUSSEN, W. and E. VAN VELZEN, 1989. High concentration suspensions: their origin and importance in Dutch estuaries and coastal waters. J. Coast. Res., 5: 1–22.Google Scholar
  25. VAN MALDEGEM, D.C., H.P.J. MULDER and A. LANGERAK, 1993. A cohesive sediment balance for the Scheldt estuary. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol., 27: 247–256.Google Scholar
  26. VAN RIJN, L.C., 1989. The state of the art in sediment transport modelling. In: S.S.Y. Wang, Ed., Sediment transport modeling. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, p. 13–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Ivens Portela
    • 1
  • Ramiro Neves
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto Superior TécnicoLisboa CodexPortugal

Personalised recommendations