Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 389–396 | Cite as

Modal verification of a destructive test of a damaged prestressed concrete beam

  • K. Allbright
  • K. Parekh
  • R. Miller
  • T. M. Baseheart
Article

Abstract

A deteriorated prestressed concrete beam was removed from a bridge and scheduled for static testing. Tendons in a lower corner of the beam had corroded and caused the corner concrete to spall. Two of the tendons were badly corroded and one was completely broken. Before static testing, a polyreference modal test was conducted. This test clearly identified the damaged area of the beam. Additionally, a flexibility matrix obtained from the modal test was used to predict beam behavior. It was found that the predictions from the modaltest flexibility matrix matched the results of the static flexural test. The modal test results were further used to create a tuned linear-elastic finite-element model which showed excellent correlation with both the modal and static tests in the linear range.

Keywords

Mechanical Engineer Fluid Dynamics Linear Range Modal Test Concrete Beam 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aktan, A.E., Hogue, T.D., and Hoyos, A., “Regional Identification of Civil Engineered Structures,” Proc. Int. Workshop on Non-Destructive Eval. of Civil Structures, Univ. of Southern California (Feb. 1988).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nilson, A., Design of Prestressed Concrete, 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York (1987).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoyos, A. and Aktan, A.E., “Regional Identification of Civil Engineered Structures Based on Impact Induced Transient Responses,” Res. Rep. 87-1, Louisiana State Univ. (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raghavendrachar, M. andAktan, A.E., “Flexibility by Multireference Impact Testing for Bridge Diagnostics,”J. Struct. Eng. ASCE,118 (8),2186–2203 (Aug.1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I-DEAS Modal Analysis User's Guide, Structural Dynamics Research Corp., Milford, OH (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller, R.A. and Parekh, K.J., “Destructive Testing of a Damaged and Deteriorated Prestressed Concrete Box Bridge Beam,” Transportation Res. Record (accepted for publication) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Allbright
    • 1
  • K. Parekh
    • 2
  • R. Miller
    • 3
  • T. M. Baseheart
    • 3
  1. 1.Shepherd EngineeringColumbus
  2. 2.Moody-Nolan Ltd.Columbus
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnati

Personalised recommendations