Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 357–368 | Cite as

CTOA and crack-tunneling measurements in thin sheet 2024-T3 aluminum alloy

  • D. S. Dawicke
  • M. A. Sutton
Article

Abstract

The stable tearing behavior of 2.3-mm thick sheets of 2024-T3 aluminum alloy was experimentally investigated for middle crack tension specimens having initial flaws that were: (a) flat fatigue cracks (low fatigue stress) and (b) 45-deg through-thickness slant cracks (high fatigue stress). The critical CTOA values during stable tearing were measured by two independent methods, optical microscopy and digital-image correlation. Results from the two methods agree well.

The CTOA measurements and observations of the fracture surfaces have shown that the initial stable tearing behavior of low and high fatigue stress tests is significantly different. The cracks in the low fatigue stress tests underwent a transition from flat-to-slant crack growth, during which the CTOA values were high and significant crack tunneling occurred. After crack growth equal to about the thickness (Δa>B), CTOA reached a constant value of 6 deg and after crack growth equal to about twice the thickness (Δa>2B), crack tunneling stabilized. The cracks in the high fatigue stress tests reach the same constant CTOA value after crack growth equal to about the thickness, but produced only slightly higher CTOA values during initial crack growth. The amount of tunneling in the high fatigue stress tests was about the same as that in the low fatigue stress tests after the flat-to-slant transition.

This study indicates that stress history has an influence on the initial portion of the stable tearing behavior. The initial high CTOA values, in the low fatigue crack tests, coincided with large three-dimensional crack front shape changes due to a variation in the through-thickness crack-tip constraint. The measured CTOA reached a constant value of 6 deg for crack growth of about the specimen thickness. This coincided with the onset of 45-deg slant crack growth and a stabilized, slightly tunneled (about 20 percent of the thickness) crack-front shape. For crack growth on the 45-deg slant, the crack front and local field variables are still highly three dimensional.

Keywords

Fatigue Crack Crack Front Fatigue Stress Slant Crack Crack Tunneling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sampath, S.G., Abou-Sayed, I.S., Broek, D., Marschall, C., Zahoor, A., and Kanninen, M.F., “The Analysis of Stable Crack Growth in Type 304 Stainless Steel,” Proc. Int. Conf. of Fract., 1759–1768 (1980).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, H., “Finite Element Representation of Stable Crack Growth,”J. Mech. and Phys. of Solids,21,337–356 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Koning, A.U., “A Contribution to the Analysis of Quasi Static Crack Growth in Steel Materials,”Fracture 1977, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Fract.,3,25–31 (1977).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wells, A.A., “Unstable Crack Propagation in Metals: Cleavage and Fast Fracture,”Proc. Cranfield Crack Propagation Symp.,1,210–230 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wells, A.A., “Application of Fracture Mechanics at and Beyond General Yielding,”Brit. Welding J.,11,563–570 (1961).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wells, A.A., “Notched Bar Tests, Fracture Mechanics and Brittle Strengths of Welded Structures, Brit. Welding J.,12,2–13 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Broberg, K.B., “On Stable Crack Growth,”J. Mech. and Phys. of Solids,23,215–237 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Orowan, E., “Fracture and Strength of Solids,”Report of Progress in Physics, Phys. Soc. of London,12,185–233 (1949).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rice, J.R., “A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks,”ASME J. Appl. Mech.,35,379–368 (1968).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Landes, J.D. and Begley, J.A., “The Effect of Specimen Geometry on J ic′ ” ASTM STP 514, Part II, 24–39 (1972).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hutchinson, J.W., “Plastic Stress and Strain Fields at a Crack Tip,”J. Mech. Phys. of Solids,16,13–31 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rice, J.R. andRosengren, G.F., “Plane Strain Deformation Near a Crack Tip in a Power-Hardining Material,”J. Mech. Phys. of Solids,16,1–12 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dean, R.H., “Elastic-Plastic Steady Crack Growth in Plane Stress”,ASTM STP 803, ASTM, Philadelphia, 83 (1983).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shih, C.F., de Lorenzi, H.G. andAndrews, W.R., “Studies on Crack Initiation and Stable Crack Growth,”ASTM STP 668, ASTM, Philadelphia, 65–120 (1974).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shih, C.F., Dean, R.H., and German, M.D., “On J-Controlled Crack Growth: Evidence, Requirements and Applications,” General Electric Co., T13 Report, Schenectady (1981).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hutchinson, J.W. andParis, P.C., “Stability Analysis of J-Controlled Crack Growth,”ASTM STP 668, ASTM, Philadelphia, 37–64 (1979).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McMeeking, R.M. andParks, D.M., “On Criteria for J-Dominance of Crack-Tip Fields in Large-Scale Yielding,”ASTM STP 668, ASTM, Philadelphia, 175–194 (1979).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kang, B.S.-J. andKobayashi, A.S., “J-Estimation Procedure based on Moiré interferometry data,”ASME J. Press. Vessel Tech.,110,291–300 (1988).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kang, B.S.-J. andKobayashi, A.S., “Stable Crack Growth in Aluminum Tensile Specimens,”Experimental Mechanics,27,234–245 (1987).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dadkhah, M.S. andKobayashi, A.S., “HRR Field of a Moving Crack, an Experimental Analysis,”Eng. Fract. Mech.,34,253–262 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dadkhah, M.S. andKobayashi, A.S., “Further Studies in the HRR Field of a Moving Crack, an Experimental Analysis,”J. Plasticity,6,635–650 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kobayashi, A.S., Dadkhah, M.S. and Kang, B.S.-J. “J-Integral and HRR Field of a Stably Growing Crack, an Experimental Analysis,” UWA/DME/TR-90/65, Office of Naval Res. (April 1990).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Drinnon, R.H. andKobayashi, A.S., “J-Integral and HRR Field Associated with Large Crack Extension,”Eng. Fract. Mech.,41 (5),684–694 (1992).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dadkhah, M.S., Kobayashi, A.S., and Morris, W.L., “Crack Tip Displacement Fields and J r-Curves for Four Aluminum Alloys,”ASTM STP 1131,11,135–153 (1992).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Davidson, D.C., “The Distribution of Strain with Crack Tip Plastic Zones,”Eng. Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 25,No. 1,pp.123–132,1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rice, J.R. andSorensen, E.P., “Continuing Crack-Tip Deformation and Fracture for Plane strain Crack Growth in Elastic-Plastic Solids,”J. Mech. and Phys. of Solids,26,163–186 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shih, C.F., “Studies on Crack Initiation and Stable Crack Growth,” ASTM STP, 668, 65–120 (1979).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shih, C.F., de Lorenzi, H.G. andAndrews, W.R., “Elastic-Plastic Fracture,”ASTM STP 668, ASTM, Philadelphia, 65 (1979).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hellman, D. and Schwalbe, K.-H., “Geometry and Size Effects on J-R and δ-R Curves Under Plane Stress Conditions,” ASTM STP 833, 577–605 (1984).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hellman, D. and Schwalbe, K.-H., “On the Experimental Determination of CTOD Based R-Curves,” Proc. Conf. on Crack Tip Opening Displacement in Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics, Springler-Verlag, 115–132 (1986).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kanninen, M.F., Popelar, C.H., andBroek, D.A Critical Survey on the Application of Plastic Fracture Mechanics to Nuclear Pressure Vessels and Piping,”Nuclear Eng. and Design,67,27–55 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kanninen, M.F., Advanced Fracture Mechanics, Oxford University Press (1985).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Demofonti, G. and Rizzi, L., “Experimental Evaluation of CTOA in Controlling Unstable Ductile Fracture Propagation,” ESIS Pub. 9, 693–703 (1991).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Newman, J.C., Jr., Dawicke, D.S., and Bigelow, C.A., “Finite-Element Analysis and Measurement of CTOA During Stable Tearing in a Thin-Sheet Aluminum Alloy,” Proc. Int. Workshop on Structural Integrity of Aging Airplanes (April 1992).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Newman, J.C., Jr. “An Elastic-Plastic Finite Element Analysis of Crack Initiation, Stable Crack Growth, and Instability,” ASTM STP 833, 93–117 (1984).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Newman, J.C., Jr., Shivakumar, K.N., andMcCabe, D.E., “Finite Element Fracture Simulation of A533B Steel Sheet Specimens,”ESIS Pub. 9, 117–126 (1991).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brocks, W. andYuan, H.Numerical Studies on Stable Crack Growth,”ESIS Pub. 9, 19–33 (1991).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hom, C.L. andMcMeeking, R.M., “Large Crack Tip Opening in Thin, Elastic-Plastic Sheets,”Int. J. Fract.,45,103–122 (1980).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Newman, J.C., Jr., Bigelow, C.A., and Shivakumar, K.N., “Three-Dimensional Elastic-Plastic Finite-Element Analysis of Constraint Variations in Cracked Bodies,” NASA TM 107704 (1993).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sommer, E. and Aurich, D., “On the Effect of Constraint on Ductile Fracture,” Proceedings of the European Symposium on Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics, ESIS/EGF Publication 9, 141–175 (1991).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sutton, M.A., Bruck, H.A., Chae, T.L., andTurner, J.L., “Experimental Investigations of Three-Dimensional Effects Near a Crack Tip Using Computer Vision,”Int. J. Fract.,53,201–228 (1991).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sutton, M.A., Bruck, H.A., andMcNeill, S.R., “Determination of Deformations Using Digital Correlation with the Newton Raphson Method for Partial Differential Correction,”Experimental Mechanics,29 (3),261–267 (1989).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sutton, M.A., Turner, J.L., Chae, T.L., and Bruck, H.A., “Development of a Computer Vision Methodology for the Analysis of Surface Deformation in Magnified Image,” ASTM STP 1094, MICOM 90, 109–132 (1990).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sutton, M.A., Turner, J.L., Bruck, H.A., andChae, T.L., “Full-Field Representation of the Discretely Sampled Surface Deformation for Displacement and Strain Analysis,”Experimental Mechanics,31 (2),168–177 (1991).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sutton, M.A. andMcNeill, S.R., “The Effects of Subpixel Image Restoration on Digital Correlation Error Estimates,”Opt. Eng.,27, (3),163–175 (1988).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dohrmann, C.R. and Bushy, H.R., “Spline Function Smoothing and Differentiation of Noisy Data on a Rectangular Grid,” Proc. VI International Conference on Exp. Mech., 843–849 (1988).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gang, H., Sutton, M.A., Chao, Y.J., and Lyons, J.S., “Ductile Crack Blunting, Initiation and Crack Growth Analysis of 304 Stainless Steel Specimens by Computer Vision,” Proc. 1993 SEM Spring Conf. on Exp. Mech. (1993).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zuidema, J. andBlaauw, H.S., “Slant Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024 Sheet Material,”Eng. Fract. Mech.,29 (4),401–413 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yang, S., Chao, Y.J. andSutton, M.A., “Complete Theoretical Analysis for Higher Order Asymptotic Terms and the HRR Zone at a Crack Tip for Mode I and Mode II Loading of a Hardening Material,”ACTA Mech.,98,79–98 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. S. Dawicke
    • 1
  • M. A. Sutton
    • 2
  1. 1.Analytical Services and Materials, Inc.Hampton
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of South CarolinaColumbia

Personalised recommendations