Chromatographia

, Volume 23, Issue 8, pp 561–565 | Cite as

Structure-retention correlations of hydrocarbons in GLC and GSC alkenylbenzenes

  • W. Engewald
  • I. Topalova
  • N. Petsev
  • Chr Dimitrov
Originals
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

For the study of relationships between retention behaviour and molecular structure in GLC and GSC the retention indices of alkenylbenzenes with 2–6 carbon atoms in a straight or branched side chain and of isotopological alkylbenzenes were determined on capillary columns coated with OV-1 and Ucon LB and on a micropacked column filled with graphitized thermal carbon black. From the values obtained index differences corresponding to the increments of the double bond in the side chain were derived. These differences depend significantly on the structure of the side chain and of the position of the double bond.

In the case of 1-phenyl-1-alkenes the double bond close to the aromatic ring gives rise to an increase of retention values, especially for the trans-isomers, causing remarkable retention differences between the cis and transisomers. The alkenylbenzenes which exhibit a terminal double bond are less strongly retained than the isotopological alkylbenzenes.

Key Words

Gas-liquid chromatography Gas-solid chromatography Retention index data Alkenylbenzenes Graphitized thermal carbon black 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Chr. Dimitrov, Z. Popova, Fam. Van Thyong, Comp. rend. acad. bulg. sci.33, 353 (1980).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    V. A. Gerasimenko, A. V. Kirilenko, V. M. Nabivach, J. Chromatogr.208, 9 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. Macák, V. Nabivach, P. Buryan, S. Šindler, J. Chromatogr.234, 285 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Tóth, J. Chromatogr.279, 157 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Albaigés, X. Guardino, Chromatographia13, 755 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Anders, K. Anders, W. Engewald, Chromatographia20, 83 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    W. Engewald, L. Wennrich, Chromatographia9, 540 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    W. Engewald, L. Wennrich, J. Pörschmann, Chromatographia11, 434 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. V. Arnaudov, Chr. Dimitrov, Compt. rend. acad. bulg. Sci.33, 647 (1980).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. D. Dimitrov, A. V. Kiselev, R. S. Petrova, Chromatographia15, 245 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Engewald
    • 1
  • I. Topalova
    • 2
  • N. Petsev
    • 2
  • Chr Dimitrov
    • 2
  1. 1.Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig, Sektion ChemieLeipzigGerman Democratic Republic
  2. 2.Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of SofiaSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations