Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 171–176 | Cite as

A thin-sheet, combined tension and bending specimen

  • S. A. Fawaz
  • J. J. M. de Rijck
Article

Abstract

Validating stress intensity factor solutions for combined tension and bending is an arduous task because the necessary experimental data are not readily available. Toward this end, a tension and bending test specimen was designed to produce controllable levels of both tension stress and bending stress at the crack location. The specimen was made from 2024-T3 clad aluminum, which is commonly used in aircraft structures. The need for testing multiple specimens of various geometries and stress levels prompted the development of an analytical tool for specimen design. An extention of the Schijve line model, based on simple beam theory, was developed to calculate the stress distributions of tension and bending through the length of the specimen. A comparison of measured static strain levels with those predicted by the model showed the model to be accurate to within 5 percent, confirming its efficacy for specimen design. As expected, for the same remote stress (100 MPa), cracks in the tension and bending specimens grew faster than those in middle-cracked tension specimens.

Key Words

Combined tension and bending thin sheet stress intensity factor finite element analysis experimental measurements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schijve, J., Some Elementary Calculations on Secondary Bending in Simple Lap Joints, NLR-TR-72036, National Aerospace Laboratory, Amsterdam (1972).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fawaz, S.A., “Fatigue Crack Growth in Riveted Joints,” Dissertation, Delft University of Technology (1997).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nam, K.W., Ando, K., Ogura, N., andMatte, K., “Fatigue Life and Prevention Behaviour of a Surface-cracked Plate Under Combined Tension and Bending,”Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mat. Struct.,17,873–882 (1994).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O'Brien, Murri, T.K., andMurri, G.B., “Combined Tension and Bending Testing of Tapered Composite Laminates,”Appl. Composite Mat.,1,401–413 (1995).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Phillips, E.P., “An Experimental Study of Fatigue Crack Growth in Aluminum Sheet Subjected to Combined Bending and Membrane Stresses,” NASA-TM-4784 (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Müller, R.P.G., “An Experimental and Analytical Investigation on the Fatigue Behaviour of Fuselage Riveted Lap Joints, the Significance of the Rivet Squeeze Force, and a Comparison of 2024-T3 and Glare 3,” Dissertation, Delft University of Technology (1995).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    COSMOS/M User's Guide for Unix, Windows NT, and Windows 95: Volume 1. Structural Research and Analysis Corporation, Los Angeles, CA (1996).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    U.S. Department of Defense, “Metallic Materials and Elements for Aerospace Vehicle Structures,” MIL-HDBK-5G (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bakker, G.J., “Road to Failure: Prediction of the Strength and Failure Type of Adhesively Bonded Single Lap Joints with the Use of the Finite Element Method,” Thesis, Delft University of Technology (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Fawaz
    • 1
  • J. J. M. de Rijck
    • 2
  1. 1.Air Force Research Laboratory, Structural Integrity Branch (AFRL/VASE)Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
  2. 2.Faculty of Aerospace EngineeringDelft University of TechnologyDelftthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations