Enzyme activities in a clay-loam soil amended with various crop residues
- 106 Downloads
Amylase, dehydrogenase, arylsulphatase and phosphatases activities were measured in a clay-loam soil amended with seven different crop residues. All enzyme activities, except phosphomonoesterase, were generally higher in the derived soil samples than in the original soil. Addition of tobacco and sunflower residues caused an increase on most of the enzyme activities while tomato residues increased only the amylase and phosphodiesterase activities.
As the enzyme activities were positively correlated to each other, a common source of the enzymes is suggested even though the coefficients of correlation demonstrate that only a low percentage of the variability can be ascribed to the interactions among enzyme activities.
Key wordsEnzyme activity Crop residues Soil amendment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bollettino della Società Italiana Scienza del Suolo (S.I.S.S.) 1976 Analisi granulometrica, Ed. Caponi, Firenze (Italy), 10, 20–55.Google Scholar
- 2.Browman M G and Tabatabai M A 1978 Phosphodiesterase activity in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 284–290.Google Scholar
- 3.Casida L E Jr, Klein D A and Santoro T 1964 Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci. 98, 371–376.Google Scholar
- 7.Jackson M L 1964 Organic matter determination for soil. Soil chemical Analysis, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
- 9.Ladd J N 1978 Origin and range of enzymes in soil.In ‘Soil enzymes’, Ed. R G Burns, Acad. Press, New York, pp 51–96.Google Scholar
- 10.Ogner G 1977 Bestemmelse av total svovel i Plante- og Humusmaterialer. Medd. Nor. Inst. Skogforsk, 33(2), 85–101.Google Scholar
- 11.Pancholy S K and Rice E L 1973 Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase and urease. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 47–50.Google Scholar
- 12.Pancholy S K and Rice E L 1973 Carbohydrases in soil as affected by successional stages of revegetation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 227–229.Google Scholar
- 13.Perucci P, Giusquiani P L and Scarponi S 1982 Nitrogen losses from added urea and urease activity of a clay-loam soil amended with crop residue. Plant and Soil, 69, 457–463.Google Scholar
- 15.Power J F and Legg J O 1978 Effect of crop residues on the soil chemical environment and nutrient availability.In ‘Crop Residue Management Systems’, Ed. W.R. Oschwald, ASAS Spec. Publ. pp 80–110.Google Scholar
- 16.Roberge M R 1978 Methodology of soil measurement and extraction.In “Soil Enzymes”, Ed. R.G. Burns, Acad. Press, New York, pp 341–370.Google Scholar
- 17.Speir T W and Ross D J 1978 Soil phosphatase and sulphatase.In ‘Soil Enzymes’, Ed. R.G. Burns, Acad. Press, New York, pp 197–250.Google Scholar
- 18.Tabatabai M A and Bremner J M 1970 Arylsulphatase activity of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 707–710.Google Scholar
- 19.Tabatabai M A and Bremner J M 1970 Factors affecting soil arylsulphatase activity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 427–429.Google Scholar