Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 217–223 | Cite as

Multiple specimen J-integral testing at intermediate rates

  • R. Salzbrenner
  • T. B. Crenshaw
Article

Abstract

The effect of experimental technique on the measurement of elastic-plastic fracture toughness has been investigated. Multiple-specimenJ-integral measurements have been performed at an intermediate loading rate. One set of measurements was conducted completely under computer/servohydraulic control, while another set was performed with a fixture that mechanically limits the maximum displacement and load. For the single condition tested, a minimal effect was measured on the initiation fracture toughness. An increased effect was seen on the measured crack-growth-resistance (J-R) curve as the amount of crack growth increased. The consequences of such testing methods in terms of general (intermediate loading rate) testing will be discussed.

Keywords

Mechanical Engineer Fracture Toughness Fluid Dynamics Experimental Technique Minimal Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    “Standard Test for J Ic,A Measure of Fracture Toughness,” ASTM E-813, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 3, Metals Test Methods and Analytical Procedures,03.01,Amer. Soc. for Test. and Mat., Philadelphia, PA, 698–712 (1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanninen, M.F. andPopelar, C.H., Advanced Fracture Mechanics, Oxford Univ. Press, New York (1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalthoff, J.F., “On the Measurement of Dynamic Fracture Toughness—A Review of Recent Work,”Int. J. Fract.,27,277–298 (1985).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalthoff, J.F. andShockey, D.A., “Instability of Cracks Under Impulse Loads,”J. Appl. Phys.,48,984–993 (1977).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salzbrenner, R., Van Den Avyle, J.A., Lutz, T.J. andBradley, W.L., “Fracture Toughness of Ductile Cast Irons,”Proc. 16th Symp. in Fract. Mech., ASTM STP 868, ed. M.F. Kanninen andA.T. Hopper, Amer. Soc. for Test. and Mat., Philadelphia, 328–344 (1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salzbrenner, R., “Fracture Toughness Behavior of Ferritic Ductile Cast Iron,”J. Mat. Sci.,22,2135–2147 (1987).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sorenson, R., Gieske, J.H., Salzbrnner, R. andWellman, G.W., “MOSAIK Cask Test Program,”Sandia Rep. SAND 88-0991, Sandia Nat. Lab., Albuquerque, NM (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    “Package and Special Form Tests,” Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 71 — Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material, 646–649 (1965).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gibson, G.P., “The Use of Alternating Current Potential Drop for Determining J-Crack Resistance Curves,”Eng. Fract. Mech.,26,213–222 (1987).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fan-Hsiung Huang, “J Ic Measurement on Single Subsidized Specimens of Ferritic Alloys,”J. Test. and Eval.,13,257–264 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deans, W.F. andRichards, C.E., “A Simple and Sensitive Method of Monitoring Crack and Load in Compact Fracture Mechanics Specimens Using Strain Gages,”J. Test. and Eval.,7,147–154 (1979).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bouami, D. andDe Vadder, D., “Detection and Measurement of Crack Closure and Opening by an Ultrasonic Method,”Eng. Fract. Mech.,23,913–920 (1986).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Salzbrenner
    • 1
  • T. B. Crenshaw
    • 1
  1. 1.Division 1832, Mechanical MetallurgySandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerque

Personalised recommendations