Passively confined tests of axial dynamic compressive strength of concrete
Article
Received:
Revised:
Abstract
Passively confined dynamic impact experiments on plain concrete specimens were performed employing steel and aluminum jackets with a 76.2-mm-diameter split-Hopkinson pressure bar system. The specific requirements of the specimens for jacketed tests were achieved with metallicmold casting. The confining pressures were determined from foil strain gages mounted on the outer wall surface of the jackets. Permanent deformation and residual static strength were measured and studied in the characterization of the behavior of plain concrete specimens under dynamic multiaxial loads.
Keywords
Compressive Strength Strain Gage Outer Wall Static Strength Permanent Deformation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Ahmad, S.H. andShah, P.S., “Complete Triaxial Stress-Strain Curves for Concrete,”J. Struct. Div., Proc. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng.,108 (ST4),728–742 (April 1982).Google Scholar
- 2.Kotsovos, M.D. and Newman, J.B., “Behavior of Concrete Under Multiaxial Stress,” ACI J., 443–446 (Sept. 1977).Google Scholar
- 3.Mills, L.L. and Zimmerman, R.M., “Compressive Strength of Plain Concrete Under Multiaxial Loading Conditions,” ACI J., 802–807 (Oct. 1970).Google Scholar
- 4.Newman, J.B., Concrete under Complex Stress, Chapter 5, Developments in Concrete Technology, ed. F.D. Lydon, Applied Science Publishers, Ltd., London (1979).Google Scholar
- 5.Tasuji, M.E., Slate, F.O. and Nilson, A.H., “Stress-Strain Response and Fracture of Concrete in Biaxial Loading,” ACI J., 306–312 (July 1978).Google Scholar
- 6.Christensen, R.J., Swanson, S.R. andBrown, W.S., “Split-Hopkinson-Bar Tests on Rock under Confining Pressure,”Experimental Mechanics,22 (11),508–513 (Nov. 1972).Google Scholar
- 7.Lindholm, U.S., Yeakley, L.M. andNagy, A., “The Dynamic Strength and Fracture Properties of Dresser Basalt,”Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr.,11,181–191 (1974).Google Scholar
- 8.Felice, C.W., Brown, J.A., Gaffney, E.S. and Olsen, J.M., “An Investigation into the High Strain-Rate Behavior of Compacted Sand Using the Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Technique,” Second Symp. on the Interaction of Non-Nuclear Munitions with Structures (April 15–19, 1985).Google Scholar
- 9.Gaffney, E.S., Brown, J.A. and Felice, C.W., “Soils as Samples for the Split Hopkinson Bar,” Second Symp. on the Interaction of Non-Nuclear Munitions with Structures (April 15–19, 1985).Google Scholar
- 10.Gong, J.C., “Confined and Unconfined Compressive Strength and Deformation of Concrete at High Strain Rates,” PhD Disc., Univ. of Florida (Aug. 1988).Google Scholar
- 11.Timoshenko, S., Strength of Materials, Part II, 3rd Ed., D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., New York (March 1956).Google Scholar
- 12.Malvern, L.E., Tang, T., Jenkins, D.A. and Gong, J.C., “Dynamic compressive strength of cementitious materials,” Cement-Based Composites: Strain Rate Effects on Fracture, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., ed. S. Mindess and S.P. Shah,64,Mat. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, PA, 119–138 (1986).Google Scholar
- 13.Malvern, L.E. andRoss, C.A., “Dynamic Response of Concrete and Concrete Structures,”Final Report, AFOSR F49620-83-k007, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville (May 1986).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 1990