Skip to main content
Log in

An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The instructional technology community is in the midst of a philosophical shift from a behaviorist to a constructivist framework, a move that may begin to address the growing rift between formal school learning and real-life learning. One theory of learning that has the capacity to promote authentic learning is that of situated learning.

The purpose of this three-part study was first, to identify critical characteristics of a situated learning environment from the extensive literature base on the subject; second, to operationalize the critical characteristics of a situated learning environment by designing a multimedia program that incorporated the identified characteristics; and third, to investigate students' perceptions of their experiences using a multimedia package based on a situated learning framework.

The learning environment, for preservice teachers, comprised a multimedia program on assessment in mathematics together with recommended implementation conditions for the classroom. Eight students were observed and interviewed to explore their perceptions of the situated learning environment. Findings suggest that the use of the situated learning framework provided effective instructional design guidelines for the design of an environment for the acquisition of advanced knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessi, S.M. (1996). Seeking common ground: Our conflicting viewpoints about learning and technology,ITForum. On-line discussion paper:ITFORUM@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU.

  • Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.),Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 18–40). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., Sherwood, R.D., Hasselbring, T.S., Kinzer, C.K., & Williams, S.M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.),Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C., & Risko, V. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.),Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 381–413). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters.American Psychologist, 52(4), 399–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989a). Debating the situation: A rejoinder to Palincsar and Wineburg.Educational Researcher, 18(5), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989b). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (1993). Stolen knowledge.Educational Technology, 33(3), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee, Y.S. (1995). Cognitive apprenticeship and its application to the teaching of Smalltalk in a multimedia interactive learning environment.Instructional Science, 23, 133–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990a). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990b). Technology and the design of generative learning environments.Educational Technology, 31(5), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Anchored instruction and situated cognition revisited.Educational Technology, 33(3), 52–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, N. (1990). Conceptions of educational achievement.Educational Researcher, 19(3), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1988).Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology (Technical Report 6899): BBN Labs Inc., Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Brown, J.S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.),Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 1–18). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible.American Educator, 15(3), 6–11, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S.E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.),Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992).Flow: The psychology of happiness. London: Rider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. (1995). Instructional design and creativity: A response to the critics.Educational Technology, 35(5), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1989). Why computers may never think like people. In T. Forester (Ed.),Computers in the human context: Information technology, productivity and people. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D.C., Pea, R.D., & Gomez, L. (1996). Constructivism in the collaboratory. In B.G. Wilson (Ed.),Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 151–164). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E.W. (1991).The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwhistle, N., Entwhistle, A., & Tait, H. (1993). Academic understanding and contexts to enhance it: A perspective from research on student learning. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.),Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 331–357). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrys, G., Weiner, A., & Lesgold, A. (1993). Learning by problem solving in a coached apprenticeship system. In M. Rabinowitz (Ed.),Cognitive science foundations of instruction (pp. 119–147). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967).The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, R.L. (1969). Roles in sociological field observation. In G. McCall & J.L. Simmons (Eds.),Issues in participant observation (pp. 30–39). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P.M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.),Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 117–138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M.M. (1995). You can't get there from here: Situated learning, transfer and map skills.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, S. (1993). Situated learning and classroom instruction.Educational Technology, 33(3), 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L., Patching, W., & Putt, I. (1994). The impact of metacognitive interactive strategies and prompts embedded in interactive multimedia in a cross-cultural context: An exploratory investigation.,Open Learning '94, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Open Learning (pp. 389–397). Brisbane: Queensland Open Learning Network & The University of Queensland.

  • Herrington, A.J., Sparrow, R.L., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R.G. (1997). Investigating assessment strategies in mathematics classrooms,Book and CD-ROM. Perth: MASTEC, Edith Cowan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., & Knibb, K. (1999). Multimedia and student activity: An interpretive study using VideoSearch.Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1999). Using situated learning and multimedia to investigate higher-order thinking.Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(1), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, J., Oliver, R., Herrington, T., & Sparrow, L. (1997). Enhancing transfer from interactive multimedia to real-world practice. In R. Kevill, R. Oliver, & R. Phillips (Eds.),What works and why: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 269–275). Perth, WA: Curtin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honebein, P.C., Duffy, T.M., & Fishman, B.J. (1993). Constructivism and the design of learning environments: Context and authentic activities for learning. In T.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.),Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 87–108). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S. (1992). Cooperative learning and computer-based design.Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, H.G.K. (1993). Distance education and situated learning: Paradox or partnership?Educational Technology, 33(12), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1991a). Context is everything.Educational Technology, 31(5), 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. (1991b). Evaluating constructivistic learning.Educational Technology, 31(9), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S., & Lesgold, A. (1993). The role of the tutor in computer-based collaborative learning situations. In S.P. Lajoie & S.J. Derry (Eds.),Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 289–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (1985). Action research and the politics of reflection. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.),Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 139–163). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D., & Macdonald, D. (1998). Situated learning in physical education.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 376–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, S. (1985). Reflection and learning: The importance of a listener. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.),Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 85–90). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, D.L., Masingila, J.O., & Mau, S.T. (1992). Grading cooperative problem solving.Mathematics Teacher, 85(8), 619–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, S. (1991). A framework for authentic assessment in mathematics.NCRMSE Research Review: The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, 1(1), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., & Ball, D. (1998).Teaching, multimedia and mathematics: Invstigations of real practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M., & Ball, D.L. (1990).Using hypermedia technology to support a new pedagogy of teacher education (Issue paper 90-5): National Center for Research on Teacher Education.

  • Latchem, C. (1993). Where are media and technology heading? In J. Herrington (Ed.),Television and video-conferencing (pp. 85–95). Perth: WADEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1996). The changing university.On-line:ITFORUM@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU.

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M.D., & Preissle, J. (1993).Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R.L., Baker, E.L., & Dunbar, S.B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria.Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, F. (1992).Activities in self-instructional texts. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1988).The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, H. (1993). Evaluation in a situated learning environment.Educational Technology, 33(3), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, H. (1994). Situated learning: Continuing the conversation.Educational Technology, 34(10), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom.Learning and instruction, 6(4), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C.A. (1992). What's the difference between authentic and performance assessment?Educational Leadership, 49(8), 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.L., Lin, X., Schwartz, D.L., Petrosino, A., Hickey, D.T., Campbell, O., Hmelo, C., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). The relationship between situated cognition and anchored instruction: A response to Tripp.Educational Technology, 34(10), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousley, J., & Sullivan, P. (1995).Learning about teaching. Geelong: Deakin University; ACU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (1993).Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S. (1989). Less charted waters.Educational Researcher, 18(5), 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, I., & Hannafin, M.J. (1993). Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia.Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1990).Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R.D. (1991). Learning through multimedia.IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, 11(4), 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualitative Solutions & Research. (1997).NUD·IST [Computer software]. Melbourne: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, C.N. (1997). Engaging learning,ITForum. On-line forum:ITFORUM@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU.

  • Reeves, T. (1995). Reaction to ‘Interactivity: A forgotten art?’ On-line:ITFORUM@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU.

  • Reeves, T.C. (1993a). Evaluating interactive multimedia. In D.M. Gayeski (Ed.),Multimedia for learning: Development, application, evaluation (pp. 97–112). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T.C. (1993b). Interactive learning systems as mindtools. In P. Newhouse &. (Eds.),Viewpoints 2 (pp. 2–11, 29). Perth: ECAWA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T.C., & Okey, J.R. (1996). Alternative assessment for constructivist learning environments. In B.G. Wilson (Ed.),Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 191–202). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. (1987). Learning in school and out.Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. (1996). Situated rationalism: The biological and cultural foundations for learning.Prospects, 26(1), 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L.B., & Resnick, D.P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B.R. Gifford & M.C. O'Connor (Eds.),Changing assessment: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 37–75). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: The analytic and systemic approaches to educational research.Educational Researcher, 20(6), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwier, R.A., & Misanchuk, E.R. (1993).Interactive multimedia instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, G. (1994). Shaping qualitative research in educational psychology.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 340–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. (1995). Interactivity: A forgotten art? On-line:ITFORUM@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU.

  • Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1991a). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.Educational Technology, 31(5), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1991b). Knowledge representation, content specification, and the development of skill in situation-specific knowledge assembly: Some constructivist issues as they relate to cognitive flexibility theory and hypertext.Educational Technology, 31(9), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R.J., Vispoel, W.P., Schmitz, J.G., Samarapungavan, A., & Boeger, A.E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B.K. Britton & S.M. Glynn (Eds.),Executive control processes in reading (Vol. 31, pp. 177–199). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, H. (1995). Introduction. In H. Torrance (Ed.),Evaluating authentic assessment: Problems and possibilities in new approaches to assessment (pp. 1–8). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, S.D. (1993). Theories, traditions and situated learning.Educational Technology, 33(3), 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, J. (1992). Reflections on reflection.Learning and Instruction, 2, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman, Eds., &, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (1932).The aims of education and other essays. London: Ernest Benn Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment.Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1990).The case for authentic assessment. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement, and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1993).Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B.G., & Welsh, J.R. (1991). Small knowledge-based systems in education and training: Something new under the sun. In Educational Technology Anthology Series (Ed.),Expert systems and intelligent computer-aided instruction (Vol. 2, pp. 7–13). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S.S. (1989). Remembrance of theories past.Educational Researcher, 18(5), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership.Educational Technology, 33(3), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.F. (1995). Assessment of situated learning using computer environments.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(1), 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.F., & McNeese, M. (1993). A situated cognition approach to problem solving with implications for computer-based learning and assessment. In G. Salvendy & M.J. Smith (Eds.),Human-computer interaction: Software and hardware interfaces. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Since 1992, as a Senior Instructional Designer, she has worked principally in multimedia and Web-based projects.

He has been teaching with, and researching innovative uses of, instructional technologies in secondary schools and universities for the past 20 years.

The authors would like to thank Professor Tom Reeves for his encouragement and support, and to acknowledge the significant role he has played in the development of our ideas and research direction.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herrington, J., Oliver, R. An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. ETR&D 48, 23–48 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856

Keywords

Navigation